Former George Bush Chief Economist Says 911 Was An Inside Job

a reply to: wildb

Don't let sky guy fool you, he's hand picking photos of the Caspian crash, the other photos show debris of the plane, he is also not telling the story of the crash..

What does that suppose to mean when you posted a debunked video of an B-757 that crash-landed in a field, not slammed into the ground at over 500 mph.

Apparently, your attempt to fool people with your debunked video has failed.

a reply to: wildb

Don't let sky guy fool you, he's hand picking photos of the Caspian crash, the other photos show debris of the plane, he is also not telling the story of the crash..

Here is the rest of the story. Satellite, radar, and seismic data, ATC communication tape, and eyewitness accounts have confirmed the crash site of United 93 and confirmed by United Airlines.

Now, let's do a review between the crash sites of Belview Airlines and United 93 and explain to us why the Belview Airline crash site does not resemble the B-757 crash site in your video.

Belview Airlines Crash Site

United 93 Crash Site

Now, let's take the B-757 crash site from your video and compare that B-757 photo with the crash site photos of Belview Airlines and United 93.

B-757 Crash Site from Your Video

To sum it up, those comparisons prove that your video has been discredited.

a reply to: wildb

Don't let sky guy fool you, he's hand picking photos of the Caspian crash, the other photos show debris of the plane,...

So did other photos of the crash site of United 93. These photos depict wreckage of United 93 wreckage outside the crash site crater.

Photo 1: United 93 Wreckage

Photo 2: United 93 Wreckage

Photo 3: United 93 Wreckage

Photo 4: United 93 Wreckage

Photo 5: United 93 Wreckage

... he is also not telling the story of the crash..

Let's take a look here and compare wreckage photos of Caspian Flt 7908 and United 93.

Photo 1: Caspian Flt 7908 Wreckage

Photo 1: United 93 Wreckage


Photo 2: Caspian Flt 7908
Wreckage

Photo 2: United 93 Wreckage


Photo 3: Caspian Flt 7908 Identification

Photo 3: United 93 Identification


Now, let's take a look at the passenger manifest of United 93.

United 93 Passenger Manifest

You will have noticed the names of the hijackers, Ziad Samir Jarrah, Ahmed Ibrahim A. Al Haznawi, Ahmed Alnami, and Saeed Alghamdi, on that flight manifest of United 93, who happened to be the same hijackers who were revealed by al-Qaeda.

al-Qaeda Reveals the 9/11 Hijackers

TRANSLATION: 9/11 was not an inside job, but was carried out by Osama bin Laden's terrorist group, al-Qaeda.
.

a reply to: wildb

Yes, the Shanksville incident is really the smoking gun. Nobody could find a crashed airliner with 80 some odd passengers or more. Could not find their baggage, could not see it from overhead news cameras.

But Skyeagle believes there was something there, he has faith.

Faith is when you believe in something you know ain't true.

a reply to: Salander

es, the Shanksville incident is really the smoking gun. Nobody could find a crashed airliner with 80 some odd passengers or more.

Reality is not with you. Check it out.

Mayor of Shanksville Statement

I saw parts of the wreckage with my own eyes, even one of the engines. It was lying in the bushes."

www.911myths.com...


Text: United Airlines Statement on Plane Crashes

Following is a statement issued by United Airlines on the crash of Flight 93 near Pittsburgh and Flight 175 in a location that was not immediately disclosed:
United Airlines has now confirmed that two of its aircraft have crashed.

— UA 93, a Boeing 757 aircraft, departed from Newark, N.J. at 8:01 a.m. local time, bound for San Francisco, with 38 passengers on board, two pilots, five flight attendants.

— UA 175, a Boeing 767 aircraft, departed from Boston at 7:58 a.m. local time, bound for Los Angeles, with 56 passengers on board, two pilots and seven flight attendants.

www.washingtonpost.com...


Flight 93 crash site

At 10:03:11, near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, the plane crashed into a reclaimed coal strip mine known as the Diamond T. Mine owned by PBS Coals in Stonycreek Township in Somerset County. The National Transportation Safety Board reported that the flight impacted at 563 mph (906 km/h, 252 m/s, or 489 knots) at a 40-degree nose-down, inverted attitude.

The impact left a crater eight to ten feet deep (c. 3 m), and 30 to 50 feet wide (c. 12 m). All 44 people on board died.[63] Many media reports and eyewitness accounts cited the time of the crash at 10:06 or 10:10, as did an analysis of seismographic data in the area,[66] but which the 9/11 Commission report states was not definitive.Other media outlets and the 9/11 Commission reported the time of impact as 10:03, based on when the flight recorders stopped, analysis of radar data, infrared satellite data, and air traffic control transmissions.

Kelly Leverknight, a local resident, was watching news of the attacks when she heard the plane. "I heard the plane going over and I went out the front door and I saw the plane going down. It was headed toward the school, which panicked me, because all three of my kids were there. Then you heard the explosion and felt the blast and saw the fire and smoke." Another witness, Eric Peterson, looked up when he heard the plane, "It was low enough, I thought you could probably count the rivets. You could see more of the roof of the plane than you could the belly. It was on its side. There was a great explosion and you could see the flames. It was a massive, massive explosion. Flames and then smoke and then a massive, massive mushroom cloud." Val McClatchey had been watching footage of the attacks when she heard the plane. She saw it briefly, then heard the impact. The crash knocked out the electricity and phones. McClatchey grabbed her camera and took the only known picture of the smoke cloud from the explosion. Ten years after 9/11, a video of the rising smoke cloud filmed by Dave Berkebile (deceased by 2011) from his yard located eight miles away from the crash site was published on YouTube.

usatoday30.usatoday.com...


Another 14 victims of Flight 93 identified

Investigators have positively identified the remains of another 14 persons aboard United Airlines Flight 93 and Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller said the investigation could conclude more quickly than expected. At the same time, the high winds that buffeted the area over the last few days have dislodged additional airplane parts -- seat cushions, wiring, carpet fragments and pieces of metal -- from trees near the crash site."It's all aircraft parts, no human remains," Miller said. "We've collected them in 10 recycling bin-sized containers and eventually we'll turn them all over to United."

Yesterday's confirmation of victims' identities by the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology DNA lab in Rockville, Md., means that 34 of the 44 people who were aboard the jetliner crashed Sept. 11. have been identified.

911research.wtc7.net...

a reply to: Salander

But Skyeagle believes there was something there, he has faith.

Faith is when you believe in something you know ain't true.

Apparently, you have confused faith with reality.

BTW, were you aware of how Gerhard Wisnewski managed to misled 9/11 conspiracy theorist on the statement made by the mayor of Shanksville, when in fact, the mayor confirmed that he saw wreckage of United 93 at the Shanksville crash site?

The fact that 9/11 conspiracy theorist overlooked the rest of the story regarding the mayor's observation of United 93 wreckage and the fact they allowed Gerhard Wisnewski to mislead them on the mayor's statement shows just how gullible 9/11 conspiracy theorist are.

a reply to: Salander

Question # 1 - How many aircraft crashes you been to ??

You say there is no wreckage ...... Searchers recovered some 125,000 lbs of debris from the site - thats over sixty tons !!

Here is picture of dumpster used to contain the debris - They filled up ten of these.......

sites.google.com...

Text

a reply to: firerescue

Question # 1 - How many aircraft crashes you been to ??

I've been to one, and what I saw was big chunks of air frame and mostly intact turbo fans..

ww4.hdnux.com...

worldonline.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com...

a reply to: wildb

It is evident that the wreckage in your photos is not from an aircraft that slammed into the ground at a steep angle at over 500 mph, unlike United 93.

Now, tell us, what was the largest piece of wreckage recovered from the crash site of PSA 1771?

a reply to: firerescue

Yes indeed, there was a lot of wreckage recovered from United 93, and remains from passengers and crew from United 93 were recovered as well.

It is evident that the wreckage in your photos is not from an aircraft that slammed into the ground at a steep angle at over 500 mph, unlike United 93.

To everyone else only a ??? would make a statement like that without knowing what flight this was, and yes it crashed just like flight 93.. but I suspect there is nobody left to read my post, the 911 threads have been killed.. hum..

a reply to: wildb

To everyone else only a ??? would make a statement like that without knowing what flight this was, and yes it crashed just like flight 93.

That won't fly because radar and altitude flight data, an ATC communication tape, and United Airlines, have confirmed the identity of United 93.

It was evident from aerial photos of the United 93 crash site that the B-757 crashed inverted and the wing and vertical stabilizer marks indicate the angle the aircraft struck the ground. In addition, satellite, black box, radar and seismic data have confirmed the crash of United 93, as well, not to mention that there were eyewitnesses to the crash of United 93.

Crickets.....can you hear that..

a reply to: wildb

You have to understand that doesn't change reality. In other words, you have no case.

Now, tell us, what was the largest piece of wreckage recovered at the crash site of PSA 1771 and how does that compare with debris recovered from the crash site of United 93?

Crash Site of PSA 1771

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

You have to understand that doesn't change reality. In other words, you have no case.

I hate doing this but you have no audience..lol what does that say..lol

a reply to: wildb

hate doing this but you have no audience...

Except for you, and since you are here, do a review at the following website.

Eyewitness Reports: Many Eyewitnesses Saw Flight 93

911research.wtc7.net...

lol....

a reply to: wildb

In other words, you have no evidence that refutes anything that I have presented. Now, why am I not surprised!

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

In other words, you have no evidence that refutes anything that I have presented. Now, why am I not surprised!

Because your a troll. ??

a reply to: wildb

That won't fly. Now, review radar data that tracked United 93.