Former George Bush Chief Economist Says 911 Was An Inside Job

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: wildb

False...

I haven't watched all your links but one of them did show fused material.
But in that material was pieces of 1/4 thick steel sticking out.
A nuke would have melted the steel too.
Plus the two guys were standing and touching what would have to be radioactive material, like it was no big deal.
So even they didn't think it was from a nuke.

didn't think it but notice how most ground zero volunteers got cancer, that may have been from asbestos but possibly radiation? But yeah no real evidence of it being a nuke.

originally posted by: samkent

originally posted by: wildb
a reply to: samkent

I'm not saying it was, just pointing out there was fused metal and other stuff..

But you are perpetuating the theory that a nuke was used.

he is talking about fused metal but that doesn't have to be from a nuke, just the controlled demolition.

a reply to: Salander

More important than fused material was the molten iron that persisted for 3 months.

There was no molten iron. You might want to review this article.

Iron Burns

Sometimes a big load of iron in a ship can get hot. The heat can even set other materials on fire. That’s because the iron is rusting, which means it is burning very, very slowly. Iron rusts in a chemical reaction called oxidation. That means the iron reacts with oxygen gas from the air. Oxidation is the chemical reaction that occurs when anything burns in air. Like most oxidations, rusting gives off heat."

www.debunking911.com...

More important than that was the radiation sickness acquired by so many. Consider the Zadroga B

No one suffered from radiation sickness at ground zero, the illnesses were attributed to hazardous materials, not radiation. Let's do a review.

9/11 Ground Zero Workers Reach Claims Settlement

Asbestos and other harmful construction materials were used in the building’s construction during the 1970s, and when the towers collapsed all those materials were pulverized into airborne microbes; which were breathed in by every individual there for weeks and months. This is not to suggest that every single person there will develop cancers and deadly diseases, but the chances of such a disease have become more possible because of the exposure.

When airborne asbestos fibers are breathed into the lungs there is a risk of developing mesothelioma, a cancer affecting the lining of the lungs. Mesothelioma and other asbestos related illnesses are at risk in construction/demolition areas when proper safety practices are not taken seriously or ignored.

www.asbestos.net...


Tritiated water: Traces only, provides further strong evidence AGAINST mini-nuke hypothesis

“Traces of tritiated water (HTO) were detected at the World Trade Center (WTC) ground zero after the 9/11/01 terrorist attack. A water sample from the WTC sewer, collected on 9/13/01, contained (0.164±0.074) nCi/L of HTO. A split water sample, collected on 9/21/01 from the basement of WTC Building 6, contained 3.53±0.17 and 2.83±0.15 nCi/L, respectively. These results are well below the levels of concern to human exposure…

e-reports-ext.llnl.gov...


Hazardous Materials at Ground Zero

Ground Zero Workers File Billion-Dollar Health Lawsuit

MONDAY, Sept. 13 (HealthDayNews) -- Nearly three years to the day of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, lawyers for more than 800 "Ground Zero" rescue and clean-up workers announced Monday a billion-dollar class-action lawsuit against owners of the World Trade Center for exposing the workers to allegedly toxic conditions.

Contained in this "toxic waste pile," according to Sawyer and Worby, were:
200,000 pounds of lead from the estimated 50,000 personal computers in thousands of World Trade Center offices

* Mercury contained in the towers' more than half a million fluorescent lights

* Dioxin from oil and fuel

* 2,000 tons of asbestos

* Benzene from more than 91,000 liters of burned jet fuel

* Cadmium, PCBs, and up to 2 million pounds of toxins known as polycystic aromatic hydrocarbons.

All of these contaminants have strong links to pulmonary, skin or immune system ailments, as well as cancer, Sawyer said. He predicted that long-term cancer rates among clean-up workers could rise to five to seven times the norm during the coming decades.

news.healingwell.com...

To sum it up, their illnesses had nothing to do with radiation.

But you are perpetuating the theory that a nuke was used.

No that is not my intention , just posting what was found.....

a reply to: wildb

What you have found had nothing to do with nukes at ground zero.

a reply to: HorusChrist

No was never evidence for demo explosives at ground zero.

ust to let you know that in your first video, that is not molten concrete

I did not say it was did I..

TextBut you are perpetuating the theory that a nuke was used.

No I am not, I have already made that clear..

originally posted by: wildb

ust to let you know that in your first video, that is not molten concrete

I did not say it was did I..

TextBut you are perpetuating the theory that a nuke was used.

No I am not, I have already made that clear..

yeah a strawman argument is being done here.

"It wasn't a nuke! That means 9/11 truthers are proven wrong!""

"I never said it was a nuke tho . . . "

originally posted by: HorusChrist

originally posted by: wildb

ust to let you know that in your first video, that is not molten concrete

I did not say it was did I..

TextBut you are perpetuating the theory that a nuke was used.

No I am not, I have already made that clear..

yeah a strawman argument is being done here.

"It wasn't a nuke! That means 9/11 truthers are proven wrong!""

"I never said it was a nuke tho . . . "

Don't get on my case man, I did not start this nuke issue, Sky did, got that? He was the one who put words in my mouth, I never said nukes were used, and I don't subscribe to that theory.

9/11 was an inside job. It involved long time planning and execution that exceeded Bin Laden's capabilities and took failures that only could exist at the localized level.

The perpetrators are still on the loose and are dangerous and crazy people who take advantage of the least fortunate for their own gains.

They deserve to be executed on the spot and a hit squad is the only way to rectify it. There is no other way.

I suggest we have a military coup to give power back.

a reply to: aj023

9/11 was an inside job. It involved long time planning and execution that exceeded Bin Laden's capabilities and took failures that only could exist at the localized level.

Osama bin Laden has admitted that he was responsible for 9/11.

He was already dead when that videotape came out. It was a faked video. Steve Pieczenik is a licensed Psychiatrist who went to Cornell university medical college and Harvard med and knows that Bin Laden died of marfan syndrome. He isn't the only person who knew he was already dead. The first video had Bin Laden denying responsibility.

a reply to: aj023

He was already dead when that videotape came out.

Actually, Osama bin Laden was alive and well, which is why his personal doctor has been laughing at 9/11 Truthers who were duped by a false story of bin Laden's death in 2001 when in fact, bin Laden was still addressing people years after 9/11.

originally posted by: wildb

originally posted by: HorusChrist

originally posted by: wildb

ust to let you know that in your first video, that is not molten concrete

I did not say it was did I..

TextBut you are perpetuating the theory that a nuke was used.

No I am not, I have already made that clear..

yeah a strawman argument is being done here.

"It wasn't a nuke! That means 9/11 truthers are proven wrong!""

"I never said it was a nuke tho . . . "

Don't get on my case man, I did not start this nuke issue, Sky did, got that? He was the one who put words in my mouth, I never said nukes were used, and I don't subscribe to that theory.

I'm supporting you, reread what I said

originally posted by: aj023
9/11 was an inside job. It involved long time planning and execution that exceeded Bin Laden's capabilities and took failures that only could exist at the localized level.

The perpetrators are still on the loose and are dangerous and crazy people who take advantage of the least fortunate for their own gains.

They deserve to be executed on the spot and a hit squad is the only way to rectify it. There is no other way.

I suggest we have a military coup to give power back.

a military coup to fix a military coup? good idea.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: aj023

9/11 was an inside job. It involved long time planning and execution that exceeded Bin Laden's capabilities and took failures that only could exist at the localized level.

Osama bin Laden has admitted that he was responsible for 9/11.

he denied it and later videos of him mistranslated what he said

originally posted by: aj023
He was already dead when that videotape came out. It was a faked video. Steve Pieczenik is a licensed Psychiatrist who went to Cornell university medical college and Harvard med and knows that Bin Laden died of marfan syndrome. He isn't the only person who knew he was already dead. The first video had Bin Laden denying responsibility.

alex jones who is widely discredited it is one who said bin laden had marfans disease, he was not qualified to say that and marfan disease doesn't always result in death so no reason to believe that.

that being said who knows what happened to him as he was never seen again after 9/11 and the dumping the body in the ocean thing was one of the weakest hoaxes ever.

a reply to: HorusChrist

he denied it and later videos of him mistranslated what he said

Apparently, he changed his mind.

Bin Laden Admits 9/11 Responsibility, Warns of More Attacks

A tape aired by Al-Jazeera television Friday showed al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden admitting for the first time that he orchestrated the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and saying the United States could face more.

www.foxnews.com...

originally posted by: HorusChrist

originally posted by: wildb

originally posted by: HorusChrist

originally posted by: wildb

ust to let you know that in your first video, that is not molten concrete

I did not say it was did I..

No I am not, I have already made that clear..

yeah a strawman argument is being done here.

"It wasn't a nuke! That means 9/11 truthers are proven wrong!""

"I never said it was a nuke tho . . . "

Don't get on my case man, I did not start this nuke issue, Sky did, got that? He was the one who put words in my mouth, I never said nukes were used, and I don't subscribe to that theory.

I'm supporting you, reread what I said

Oh sorry, I did not understand what you said, thanks for your support.

that being said who knows what happened to him as he was never seen again after 9/11 and the dumping the body in the ocean thing was one of the weakest hoaxes ever.

www.foxnews.com...