Former George Bush Chief Economist Says 911 Was An Inside Job

To set the record straight, I am the person who asked you, and others, for demo timelines in the WTC 7 video and I am still waiting.

How many times do we have to do this? Memory problems again , I am beginning to think something is wrong with you. Your like talking to a broken record, you just keep repeating yourself over and over again. Do you even read what people say to you? To me and others it seems you don't..

a reply to: wildb

How about until you post the demo timelines that I have been requesting.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

How about until you post the demo timelines that I have been requesting.

I guess my last post is right on the money, you sure know how to do yourself in...

a reply to: wildb

I have challenged those to prove me wrong, and what did they do?! They ran to "AE 911 Truth" and referenced disinformation that was debunked years ago. What am I to make of that?!

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

I have challenged those to prove me wrong, and what did they do?! They ran to "AE 911 Truth" and referenced disinformation that was debunked years ago. What am I to make of that?!

Make nothing of it.. you can't be proven wrong, and neither can I.. see thats the problem, do you understand.. however with that said the scail tips to wrong doing..

a reply to: wildb

Make nothing of it.. you can't be proven wrong, and neither can I.. see thats the problem, do you understand.. however with that said the scail tips to wrong doing..

It seems that you have no idea as to why I am placing a challenge on certain people to post demo timelines from those WTC videos.

a reply to: wildb

Make nothing of it.. you can't be proven wrong, and neither can I..

Correct me if I am wrong, but were you one of the folks who supported the hoaxed story that nukes took out the WTC buildings?

I have had to correct truthers on a regular basis simply because they were posting disinformation that I knew was planted in order to discredit the Truth Movement.

a reply to: skyeagle409

You have been corrected many times, by many different posters, and it is most obvious that you don't give a damn. You keep spamming the place with government propaganda that cannot possibly be accurate.

this thread isn't really about the bush economic advisor pushing disinfo no planes theory anymore is it? Just playing wack a mole with someone who trusts the govt implicitly who just denies every painful fact?

a reply to: Salander

You have been corrected many times,

That is false! Correcting me with disinformation from discredited truther websites that was debunked years ago doesn't fly. After all, i was the person who posted a reference to that hoaxed WTC 7 video, which was posted days later by truthers who were unaware that the WTC 7 video was a hoax, and you call that correcting me???

Correct me if I am wrong, but were you one of the folks who supported the hoaxed story that nukes took out the WTC buildings?

Ok I will, I posted a paper about it and said make of this what you wish, I did not say I supported the theory, just so you understand..

a reply to: wildb

Ok I will, I posted a paper about it and said make of this what you wish, I did not say I supported the theory, just so you understand..

I can accept that. A nuke would have vaporized much of WTC steel since nukes generate temperatures of millions of degrees F., and would have leveled a large area around the World Trade Center. In addition, vehicles, cameras, computers and even aircraft would have been affected by EMP, which did not occur as evident by the fact that video cameras and vehicles continued to operate normally even after WTC 7 collapsed.

To let know how devastating EMP can be, a large nuclear detonation at high altitude over Kansas would affect much of the United States and send millions back into the stone age and yet, we are being led to believe that nukes were detonated and responsible for the destruction of the WTC buildings.

As it was, the WTC nuke story was determined to be a hoax and pushed by Gordon Duff, who has admitted that he was a source of disinformation, and yet, there are 9/11 conspiracy theorist who continue to claim that nukes were used in New York City.

a reply to: skyeagle409

You act as though there has been no progress whatsoever in nuclear device technology since 1945. That is a most naïve assumption on your part.

a reply to: Salander

You act as though there has been no progress whatsoever in nuclear device technology since 1945.

At the very least there would have been a lot of fused material at ground zero.
And yet no reports of such ever came out.
Don't try to say they covered that up too as there were cameras watching the cleanup.

a reply to: samkent

Actually there was some "fused material". Sorry I cannot post a picture of it, but I have seen a picture of it, maybe 18 inches long.

More important than fused material was the molten iron that persisted for 3 months. More important than that was the radiation sickness acquired by so many. Consider the Zadroga Bill.

The damage observed cannot possibly have been caused by office fires on the 80th floor.

At the very least there would have been a lot of fused material at ground zero. And yet no reports of such ever came out.

False...



www.youtube.com...


www.youtube.com...


www.youtube.com...


www.youtube.com...

a reply to: wildb

False...

I haven't watched all your links but one of them did show fused material.
But in that material was pieces of 1/4 thick steel sticking out.
A nuke would have melted the steel too.
Plus the two guys were standing and touching what would have to be radioactive material, like it was no big deal.
So even they didn't think it was from a nuke.

a reply to: samkent

I'm not saying it was, just pointing out there was fused metal and other stuff..

a reply to: wildb

Just to let you know that in your first video, that is not molten concrete, what you are looking at are compacted floors. Someone duped 9/11 conspiracy theorist into thinking that so-called meteor was molten concrete and amazing, 9/11 conspiracy theorist took that false story and used it in their debates. If they took a closer look, they would find paper embedded within that object.

Photo 1: WTC "Meteor"

Photo 2: WTC "Meteor"

You would have also noticed that the rebar in the photos was in no way in a molten state.

originally posted by: wildb
a reply to: samkent

I'm not saying it was, just pointing out there was fused metal and other stuff..

But you are perpetuating the theory that a nuke was used.