It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: ketsuko
Sure... according to Israel the Palestinians are always the aggressors. Pardon me while I gag on the fact that people still buy this kind of propaganda.
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: UnBreakable
They don't need the Wests help.
Or permission.
I am not a fan of the Palestinians,
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Metallicus
I am not a fan of the Palestinians,
Not a fan either.
Also not a fan of Israeli critics either.
Everyone crying foul about it when they sure didn't give a rats behind about the Palenstinians when they were occupied by the Ottoman Empire.
Only now.
Guess some people just love to take up where Hitler left off.
Some people all too happy to do it.
They did, in '67, remember? The six day war fought from Syria, Egypt, Jordan, supported by the whole arab world. The US helped Israel win that, even though they didn't really win, the Arabs stopped on the Golan heights without realizing they had won.
Though Johnson continued to caution Israel against preemption, a number of the President’s advisors had concluded that U.S. interests would be best served by Israel “going it alone” by the time the Israelis actually did so.
From the beginning, the United States sought a ceasefire in order to prevent an Arab defeat bad enough to force the Soviet Union to intervene. U.S. officials were also concerned about alienating pro-Western Arab regimes, especially after Egypt and several other Arab states accused the United States of helping Israel and broke diplomatic relations. Yet after June 5, the administration did not also demand an immediate Israeli pullback from the territories it had occupied. U.S. officials believed that in light of the tenuous nature of the prewar armistice regime, they should not force Israel to withdraw unless peace settlements were put into place.
originally posted by: intrptr
The "president" of some place used to be called Palestine that no longer exists-- they should call him the governor of Gaza and West Bank, is not "dropping a bomb" in the UN. He is standing his ground against the bombs raining on whats left of his peoples little sliver of land, getting more slivered every day.
More power to them, their cause is just, nothing like a man in the right that keeps on a commin…
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Let Israel deal with their problems. We're all about no intervention, no imperialism, remember? Let Palestine deal with Israel itself.
Convenient. Palestine has Iranian backing, and now we're backing Iran.
No side in any conflict is ever pure as the wind-driven snow.
A new website is publicizing the identities of pro-Palestinian student activists to prevent them from getting jobs after they graduate from college. But the website is keeping its own backers’ identity a secret. Read more: forward.com...
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
Mr. Netanyahu may well make the Palestinian issue the primary focus of his speech, and will probably repeat his recent statements that he is ready to restart negotiations with President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority anywhere, anytime. Mr. Netanyahu insists that these talks have no preconditions — but that itself is a condition he knows the Palestinian leader will not accept. (Mr. Abbas has insisted that he will resume negotiations only if Israel releases long-serving Palestinian prisoners, halts construction of West Bank settlements and bases the talks on the pre-1967 lines that divided Israel from the West Bank and Gaza Strip.)
source: NYT's
This comment was made before Mr. Abbas comments today.
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
a reply to: ~Lucidity
I expect tomorrow in his speech, Netanyahu will be giving more than lip service. I dread it.
What Abbas has done is very dangerous.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
Mr. Netanyahu may well make the Palestinian issue the primary focus of his speech, and will probably repeat his recent statements that he is ready to restart negotiations with President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority anywhere, anytime. Mr. Netanyahu insists that these talks have no preconditions — but that itself is a condition he knows the Palestinian leader will not accept. (Mr. Abbas has insisted that he will resume negotiations only if Israel releases long-serving Palestinian prisoners, halts construction of West Bank settlements and bases the talks on the pre-1967 lines that divided Israel from the West Bank and Gaza Strip.)
source: NYT's
This comment was made before Mr. Abbas comments today.
Lip service.
If Israel, or, more specifically, Netanyahu and his warmongering, party Likud (their version of/counterpart to our warmongering GOP), wanted peace, there would be peace.
originally posted by: Milah
I find Israel's undeclared nukes more omininous! About time they be given an ultimatum by those under their siege.
I mean, hello NATO members including US, what's with the DOUBLE STANDARD?
I ask you to consider the history of the question of Palestine and the relevant United Nations resolutions to realize the obvious truth: that a historic injustice has been inflicted upon a people and a homeland, a people that had lived peacefully in their land and made genuine intellectual, cultural and humanitarian contributions to mankind. This people do not deserve to be deprived of their homeland, to die in exile or be swallowed by the sea, or to spend their lives fleeing from one refugee camp to another. Yet regrettably, their just cause remains at a standstill after the passage of all these years
[..]
The persistence of this matter prompts us to ask: do the votes by democratic countries against Palestine-related resolutions and the legitimate rights of our people serve peace and those who believe in the two-State solution? Or do they serve and encourage extremists and increase their hatred and racism, making them believe that they are above the law, to the point where they commit the burning of a Palestinian family in the town of Duma in the West Bank, claiming the lives of an infant, Ali Dawabsheh, and his father and mother? What is left of this family is an orphan child, Ahmed, 4-year old, who lies between life and death in the hospital as a result of his bums, while the killers remain free and have not yet been arrested
[..]
Is it not time to end this injustice? Is it not time to stop this suffering? Is it not time for the racist annexation wall to be dismantled? Is it not time for the humiliating and degrading checkpoints and barriers set up by the Israeli occupying forces in our land to be removed, for the Israeli blockade imposed on the Gaza Strip to be lifted, and for our people to move in freedom and dignity in their own homeland and outside? Is it not time to end the racist, terrorist, colonial settlement of our land, which is destroying the two-State solution? Is it not the time for the six thousand Palestinian prisoners and detainees in Israeli jails to see the light of freedom and to live among their families and communities? Is it not the time for the longest occupation in history suffocating our people to come to an end?
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
a reply to: ~Lucidity
I expect tomorrow in his speech, Netanyahu will be giving more than lip service. I dread it.
What Abbas has done is very dangerous.
Dangerous or not, I'd call it brave. And about damn time. How much longer can we go on with one set of rules for everyone except Israel?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Kali74
If one side keeps trying to invade the other and loses every time, they lose real estate too. Not every country can afford to be like the US and back out.
Heck, Russia would sympathize with Israel. How much land has Russia grabbed? Georgia ... Crimea ... working on Ukraine.