It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Good question
Look at the presidential candidate field the Republicans have one black two Hispanic and one Indian running for president
The Democrats only have old white people of candidates
If the Democrats are truly the party for racial minorities then why do the Republicans have 100% of the minority presidential candidates
The proof is not in rhetoric but the proof is in action
Instead of just giving lip service to minorities having the same abilities the same smarts the same qualifications of white people it is the Republicans who are the ones who are acting as if the minorities are smart and capable in this election cycle
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Well then this is the perfect time to write this article, when it's not too late to wake some Conservatives up from supporting this buffoon.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
Sorry, but Trump has many of our votes and a chance to win. It isn't our BEST choice...it isn't even the choice we WANT. But it is better than what we currently have, what we are being promised (more lies) and what the left is putting up. At least to us.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Reallyfolks
I can agree. But Reagan get's to take blame for that too.
Should we also revisit the October Surprise? I know that's "conspiracy", but it's worth mentioning.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: enlightenedservant
Then maybe they DO need to learn the hard way. I'm really just trying to help them avoid an embarrassment in the future. Which is what will happen during the national election if they nominate Trump, but if that is the inevitable future, sometimes you just need to stand out of the way and let the child bust his nose.
more extreme lunatics getting the nomination
originally posted by: beezzer
And what percent of actual voters are hispanic?
We're talking tiny numbers here.
Not an issue, as far as over-all voters go.
The white percentage of the electorate has been shrinking for decades and will be about 2 points smaller in 2016 than in 2012. In 2008, Barack Obama became the first president elected while losing the white vote by double digits. In 2012, Hispanics, the nation’s largest minority, were for the first time a double-digit (10 percent) portion of the electorate. White voters were nearly 90 percent of Romney’s vote. In 1988, George H.W. Bush won 59 percent of the white vote, which translated into 426 electoral votes. Twenty-four years later, Romney won 59 percent of the white vote and just 206 electoral votes. He lost the nonwhite vote by 63 points, receiving just 17 percent of it. If the Republicans’ 2016 nominee does not do better than Romney did among nonwhite voters, he will need 65 percent of the white vote, which was last achieved by Ronald Reagan when carrying 49 states in 1984. Romney did even slightly worse among Asian Americans — the fastest-growing minority — than among Hispanics. Evidently, minorities generally detected Republican ambivalence, even animus, about them. This was before Trump began receiving rapturous receptions because he obliterates inhibitions about venting hostility.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: enlightenedservant
Then maybe they DO need to learn the hard way. I'm really just trying to help them avoid an embarrassment in the future. Which is what will happen during the national election if they nominate Trump, but if that is the inevitable future, sometimes you just need to stand out of the way and let the child bust his nose.
Honestly, I hope they never learn. Because that would simply mean they've learned to conceal their base's bigotry enough to con the Latino/Latina voters into supporting them.
Instead, I think they'll actually have to address their base's bigotry, start teaching & implementing equality, and actually keep rejecting the Republicans who attack the Hispanic communities. And I don't mean those crappy, half-apologies. I mean, completely banning anti-Latino/Latina policies from their local, statewide, and national platforms. Then I could see the outreach working.
Of course, if that happened, the Democratic Party would be wiped out. Democrats already take the black & brown votes for granted while never making our issues a priority. It's basically choosing between a party that actively hits us and another party that allows the other party to actively hit us. We face the same disproportionate effects of the judicial system & law enforcement whether we have Democrats or Republicans in office. (That's why I'm just as likely to vote for a 3rd party candidate as I am a Dem.)
So if Republicans actually change their anti-Hispanic tactics, the political landscape would change dramatically.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: enlightenedservant
Then maybe they DO need to learn the hard way. I'm really just trying to help them avoid an embarrassment in the future. Which is what will happen during the national election if they nominate Trump, but if that is the inevitable future, sometimes you just need to stand out of the way and let the child bust his nose.
Honestly, I hope they never learn. Because that would simply mean they've learned to conceal their base's bigotry enough to con the Latino/Latina voters into supporting them.
Instead, I think they'll actually have to address their base's bigotry, start teaching & implementing equality, and actually keep rejecting the Republicans who attack the Hispanic communities. ...