It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: IAMTAT
hmmm...guess you are going to have to keep hoping for a smoking gun.
Clinton aides have maintained that nothing on her server was classified at the time she saw it, suggesting that classified messages were given the label after the fact.
John Kirby, a spokesman for the State Department, said that was the case with two emails, adding that it remained unclear "whether, in fact, this material is actually classified."
"Department employees circulated these emails on unclassified systems in 2009 and 2011, and ultimately some were forwarded to Secretary Clinton," Kirby said Tuesday. "They were not marked as classified."
www.nbcnews.com...
Again, that is according to "Clinton Aides"...so there's that.
The IG, FBI and DOJ perhaps has a different interpretation.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: Gothmog
This all depends on what classification of "Top Secret" the documents are . And whether or not her "What does it matter?" will work again. This will be her defense. Deflect from the issue as much as possible. It will be spun into sounding insignificant.The part about it being classified emails will not matter. And of course , she will find something to lock those emails down.
Intelligence was classified as TOP SECRET - SPECIAL COMPARTMENT ED INTELLIGENCE which is about as high as you can get
Change "was" to "is now, but wasn't then" and you are accurate..
Again,....you're putting a lot of faith in what "Clinton Aides" said.
Consider the possibility that they might have a vested interest in propagating that version of the truth.
and that two emails on her private account have been classified as “Top Secret.”
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Indigo5
Do you really think a Secretary of State doesn't know what should be classified as Top Secret? C'mon.
originally posted by: Leonidas
How very "Nixon-esque" of her. Why do these idiots always keep records? I would have thought the real reason to use your own servers is so you can burn them in the fireplace and be safe in the knowledge your misdeeds are hidden.
Egos of assholes never cease to amaze me.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: IAMTAT
So...she's supposed to eye every. single. email. with the eye of "should this be top secret or not...hmmm" -- you do realize that TEAMS of analysts make the decision to classify documents, right?
Clinton, like Obama isn't super human with extraordinary powers of fortune telling.
If it turns out that these the information contained within the emails was classified after she got them, I don't really see what can be done to her.
originally posted by: burntheships
If she had used the secure system provided by The Government to send
and receive, there is a classification drop down that must be used
to complete the send.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
What about the people sending her these emails? I mean anyone can send me something illegal to my email address, it doesn't mean I *asked* to be sent something I shouldn't be in possession of.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: IAMTAT
I am no Hillary fan, but not only doesn't this dog hunt but it's not even a dog..
I'm sorry, but the IG, DOJ and FBI think definitely Hillary is a dog and it's hunting her.
THIS is an official Criminal investigation...Yes?
edit on 11-8-2015 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)
Man you're trying too hard. This was an unforced error on her part. No one but Hillary chose to circumvent protocols and use her own server for official correspondence.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
What about the people sending her these emails? I mean anyone can send me something illegal to my email address, it doesn't mean I *asked* to be sent something I shouldn't be in possession of.