It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper
You are ignorant of facts. Walking down he street is not a valid reason for being stopped.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper
You are ignorant of facts. Walking down he street is not a valid reason for being stopped.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper
You are ignorant of facts. Walking down he street is not a valid reason for being stopped.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Mugly
Stop and Frisk policies don't require a crime to have been committed to stop someone. Do you not understand that? That's a direct violation of the Constitution and white fear/hate allows that violation. Do you not understand that?
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper
Search results from google
originally posted by: Bone75
From the #Black Lives Matter/About page...
#BlackLivesMatter was created in 2012 after Trayvon Martin’s murderer, George Zimmerman, was acquitted for his crime
George Zimmerman didn't murder anyone, he shot his attacker in self-defense. This movement is BS.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper
Search results from google
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper
Search results from google
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The Stop-question-and-frisk program, or stop-and-frisk, in New York City, is a practice of the New York City Police Department in which police officers stop and question a pedestrian, then frisk them for weapons and other contraband; this is what is known in other places as the Terry stop. The rules for stop, question and frisk are found in the state's Criminal Procedure Law (the criminal procedure law) section 140.50, and are based on the decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Terry v. Ohio.[1][2] About 684,000 people were stopped in 2011.[1][3][4] The vast majority of these people were African-American or Latino.[1][3][4] Some judges have found that these stops are not based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.[5]
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Mugly
Are you American? If so, read the US Constitution please. Seriously.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Probable cause can only mean that a crime has been committed in which the police have been called and you match the description given by a witness, a crime has been committed and the police witnessed it themselves, a crime has been committed and you are the only person around.
The Stop-question-and-frisk program, or stop-and-frisk, in New York City, is a practice of the New York City Police Department in which police officers stop and question a pedestrian, then frisk them for weapons and other contraband; this is what is known in other places as the Terry stop. The rules for stop, question and frisk are found in the state's Criminal Procedure Law (the criminal procedure law) section 140.50, and are based on the decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Terry v. Ohio.[1][2] About 684,000 people were stopped in 2011.[1][3][4] The vast majority of these people were African-American or Latino.[1][3][4] Some judges have found that these stops are not based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.[5]
wikipedia
ETA: Note: Stop and Frisk exists outside of NYC as well.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper
A bear is a wild animal, a person... a black person is not a wild animal.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: JalapenoPepper
Facts don't hurt anyone...
And even if they did...
Your post did not involve any!