Exposed: The Faces and Fake Names of the People Behind Planned Parenthood Attack Videos

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: krosnos

So we hate whistle-blowers now?

(I can never keep it straight)

NO. Have never hated whistle blowers. This sham is not that.

So let me guess ... someone is only a legitimate whistle blower when they blow the whistle on something you agree with? The rest of the time ... they are a sham?

Bingo was his name o

originally posted by: krosnos

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: krosnos

xuenchen talking bout ethics and morals is hilarious..

I am pretty sure people have read your threads.... and pot meet kettle was so accurate.

Yes.

ad hominem as a last resort.

A Gem. The Hope Diamond.

Umm maybe stop making a fool of yourself in other peoples threads..

Actually, it's my job to make a fool of myself in other people's threads.

I even have a 401k, but no healthcare, ironically.

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: krosnos

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: krosnos

xuenchen talking bout ethics and morals is hilarious..

I am pretty sure people have read your threads.... and pot meet kettle was so accurate.

Yes.

ad hominem as a last resort.

A Gem. The Hope Diamond.

Umm maybe stop making a fool of yourself in other peoples threads..

Actually, it's my job to make a fool of myself in other people's threads.

I even have a 401k, but no healthcare, ironically.

And we still dont have the T-Shirts you were suppose to get us printed up a month ago.......

WTH Rabbit.....

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: krosnos

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: krosnos

xuenchen talking bout ethics and morals is hilarious..

I am pretty sure people have read your threads.... and pot meet kettle was so accurate.

Yes.

ad hominem as a last resort.

A Gem. The Hope Diamond.

Umm maybe stop making a fool of yourself in other peoples threads..

Actually, it's my job to make a fool of myself in other people's threads.

I even have a 401k, but no healthcare, ironically.

And we still dont have the T-Shirts you were suppose to get us printed up a month ago.......

WTH Rabbit.....

I've had issues.

Apologies.

a reply to: beezzer

Were you selling harvested t-shirt parts to overseas sweatshops again?

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: krosnos

So we hate whistle-blowers now?

(I can never keep it straight)

NO. Have never hated whistle blowers. This sham is not that.

I know that's the way you feel because you are pro-abortion.

But has their guilt been disproven?

I am not pro-abortion. I don;t there is ANY such thing. You should re word that.

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: krosnos

So we hate whistle-blowers now?

(I can never keep it straight)

NO. Have never hated whistle blowers. This sham is not that.

So let me guess ... someone is only a legitimate whistle blower when they blow the whistle on something you agree with? The rest of the time ... they are a sham?

Bingo was his name o

No, that is not correct. There are people that are for a whole bunch of things I disagree with, doesn't make them a sham. But, I have seen this fallacy response a lot anyway.

There are people who believe whole heartedly that Jesus is the son of God and he died, knowingly, for our sins. I do not find that accurate, but I don't call them a sham.

I think the first time I have used that word in 10 years is today, The 'investigators', 'journalists', pushing this specific thing are shams.
It has been manufactured for inaccurate and unsound purposes. It may even be taking our attention away from something else.




I try to remain serious about this. But the 'opposing side' seems to like glib and snark as in 'bingo was his name o'. Difficult to to debate that kind of childishness.

originally posted by: ~Lucidity

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: ~Lucidity

MediaMatters is another excellent source.

Funded by George Soros.

Can't argue with success they say.

Media Matters, with all its alleged faults, is heads above most of the tripe on the internet. What is takes is to start there and then do some digging on your own, from ALL perspectives, and compare, and then apply some common sense.

lol about media matters

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: beezzer

Were you selling harvested t-shirt parts to overseas sweatshops again?

Yes

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: krosnos

So we hate whistle-blowers now?

(I can never keep it straight)

NO. Have never hated whistle blowers. This sham is not that.

I know that's the way you feel because you are pro-abortion.

But has their guilt been disproven?

I am not pro-abortion. I don;t there is ANY such thing. You should re word that.

If you aren't against it, then I'm not sure how else to classify it.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: krosnos

So we hate whistle-blowers now?

(I can never keep it straight)

NO. Have never hated whistle blowers. This sham is not that.

I know that's the way you feel because you are pro-abortion.

But has their guilt been disproven?

I am not pro-abortion. I don;t there is ANY such thing. You should re word that.

And there in lies the issue with society these days

YOU dont like the word, so you want OTHER people to change their language.......

Sorry , the world doesnt work like that, thats straight up entitlement mentality

a reply to: reldra

There are people who believe whole heartedly that Jesus is the son of God and he died, knowingly, for our sins. I do not find that accurate, but I don't call them a sham.

LOL yet you call for someone else to redefine their language to suit your sensibilities....

Priceless

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: beezzer

Were you selling harvested t-shirt parts to overseas sweatshops again?

Yes

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: krosnos

So we hate whistle-blowers now?

(I can never keep it straight)

NO. Have never hated whistle blowers. This sham is not that.

I know that's the way you feel because you are pro-abortion.

But has their guilt been disproven?

I am not pro-abortion. I don;t there is ANY such thing. You should re word that.

If you aren't against it, then I'm not sure how else to classify it.

You know exactly how it is classified. You just hit another on that ridiculous list of 'thread derailing things'- playing dumb.

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: krosnos

So we hate whistle-blowers now?

(I can never keep it straight)

NO. Have never hated whistle blowers. This sham is not that.

I know that's the way you feel because you are pro-abortion.

But has their guilt been disproven?

I am not pro-abortion. I don;t there is ANY such thing. You should re word that.

And there in lies the issue with society these days

YOU dont like the word, so you want OTHER people to change their language.......

Sorry , the world doesnt work like that, thats straight up entitlement mentality

ABORTION. It is a a word, no more, no less. Just don't inaccurately portray me if you are going to put a label on me. Adding pro to that is labeling ME. Not the ball, the Player. I don't think the term 'pro-abortion' describes anyone.

a reply to: reldra

So how would you "classify" me?

(just a note, asshole has already been used)

I saw his story on a reputable news site, so I tend to believe that the whole thing is a hoax.

Plus, who in their right mind would run at the mouth like that about this particular topic??

It's sensationalist, dramatic, overzealous-bordering-on-insane, RTLer BS, IMHO.

originally posted by: krosnos

Media Calls Out Deceptively Edited Video Claiming To Show Planned Parenthood "Selling Aborted Baby Parts"


But all the rightwing sites are only showing the edited version and basing all their opinion on those stories.

It's to be expected isn't it.

This is a corporate takeover.

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: reldra

So how would you "classify" me?

(just a note, asshole has already been used)

I'm not doing it.

originally posted by: lovebeck

I saw his story on a reputable news site

That is the *Whole* problem right there.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: krosnos

So we hate whistle-blowers now?

(I can never keep it straight)

NO. Have never hated whistle blowers. This sham is not that.

I know that's the way you feel because you are pro-abortion.

But has their guilt been disproven?

I am not pro-abortion. I don;t there is ANY such thing. You should re word that.

And there in lies the issue with society these days

YOU dont like the word, so you want OTHER people to change their language.......

Sorry , the world doesnt work like that, thats straight up entitlement mentality

ABORTION. It is a a word, no more, no less. Just don't inaccurately portray me if you are going to put a label on me. Adding pro to that is labeling ME. Not the ball, the Player. I don't think the term 'pro-abortion' describes anyone.

Do you agree with abortion....?

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: krosnos

So we hate whistle-blowers now?

(I can never keep it straight)

NO. Have never hated whistle blowers. This sham is not that.

I know that's the way you feel because you are pro-abortion.

But has their guilt been disproven?

Sigh...

In Order To Beat ‘Em, You Have to Know Their Game …
...
3. Start a partisan divide-and-conquer fight or otherwise push emotional buttons to sow discord and ensure that cooperation is thwarted. Get people fighting against each other instead of the corrupt powers-that-be. Use baseless caricatures to rile everyone up. For example, start a religious war whenever possible using stereotypes like “all Jews are selfish”, “all Christians are crazy” or “all Muslims are terrorists”. Accuse the author of being a gay, pro-abortion limp-wristed wimp or being a fundamentalist pro-war hick when the discussion has nothing to do with abortion, sexuality, religion, war or region. Appeal to people’s basest prejudices and biases. And (as explained by H. Michael Sweeney’s 25 Rules of Disinformation) push the author into a defensive posture:

Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule … Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

(The person trying to smear reputation may not be a random knucklehead … he may, in fact, be a government agent, or a member of the group he’s smearing.)