It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ISawItFirst
Nope. They also have a privelage to solicit donations. They also have a privelage to bot allow voting on church business and not print your name in their list of members if you don't donate (enough).
This isn't solicitation. It is coercion.
Sending an unenforceable bill as a solicitation attempt is very scummy, but how many fake checks etc do we get in the mail everyday.
There is nothing here to indicate a law violation.
The quite from the law on page 2 is not applicable.
Then I guess an audit wouldn't turn up any wrong doing then.
The IRS even being able to audit a church is a clear 1st ammendment violation. Any law they run foul of in the tax code is as well.
Why? The church could just easily pay taxes.
I agree. It's tough. You don't want tax free bullies but you also want equitable treatment of everyone. In this case, the lady could just walk away if she wanted, In scientology, they make very real and actionable acts.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: NavyDoc
Yea, I've been thinking about this for awhile now and I was wrong initially. I was letting my emotions get the better of me. Scientology not only does this, they will destroy your life if you don't pay them. And they have tax exempt status.
She should switch to Catholic, Anglican, United, they can't make the poor pay there.
Catholic Church dismisses reports it will still use Ellis defence to block sexual abuse victim legal action
The World Today By Thomas Oriti
Posted 18 May 2015, 1:42pm
The Catholic Church has dismissed reports it is planning to continue relying on a legal defence that blocks victims of child sexual abuse from taking action.
In 2007 the New South Wales Court of Appeal found the Catholic Church could not be sued for compensation because it was not a legal entity.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: NavyDoc
Yea, it just angers me that a church would take advantage of its congregation like that, but then again churches have been doing that for WAY longer than this church has existed. It's probably a religious institution at this point.
I still kind of want to have them audited, but that is more the anger talking at this point than any real desire to pursue real legal consequences.
If people lived by the message all religions have as their base, then we wouldn't be in trouble.
if I had the power and thank Gaawd I don't I would phase out religious institutions or tax them heavily they have served their purpose, they gave us great art and music they were there in times of need and served as a meeting place for information and comfort that said, it's high time to phase out the rot is in and cannot be undone.
The predominantly black church, which has operated for more than a century, asked her to pay a yearly $250 anniversary fee and another $150 for Mount Moriah Day – amounting to $1,000, some of which would be set aside to pay off church debt.
Unless that history dates to the 1900's when Tolkien invented his languages, doubtful.
originally posted by: NthOther
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
I like how you adopt this Christian persecution complex when this church is CLEARLY in the wrong here. This is equivalent to the middle ages when you had to bribe the clergy for salvation.
A) I'm not a Christian.
B) In the middle ages, you couldn't just go to another church down the street if one pissed you off.
I'm not saying they're not jerks. I'm saying that the only reason you guys are so worked up about it is because it's a religion doing it.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
I still kind of want to have them audited, but that is more the anger talking at this point than any real desire to pursue real legal consequences.