It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: Woodcarver
Nope, she didn't know she was pregnant at that point and when I said I had no condoms she said that's cool, I'm on the pill.
After she realised she was pregnant she admitted to me that she lied.
In fact, I had much respect for her admitting it, she could have continued with the lie and I wouldn't have known either way.
The bottom line is that I only consented to sex that day because she lied to me.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: EvillerBob
Well it's being discussed in the states now. I don't have personal knowledge of the goings on in the UK. I mean, I am under no illusions anyways. I KNOW that making this illegal will result in jail time for people and families destroyed by the government.
Hahaha! I've been thinking exactly the same thing for the last few pages now, just didn't want to raise it myself!
originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: grainofsand
I cannot imagine that if the roles were reversed this would have gone the same way.
If you had lied about being sterile or had a vasectomy and she was saying what you did was wrong I would forsee a very different set of opinions in this thread.
originally posted by: grainofsand
Good find
I've had a skim through and it appears that the Crown Prosecution Service agrees that consent for sex obtained through deception is a crime: