It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: EKron
originally posted by: JadeStar
Me as someone who had surgery at 17 feeling weird about showering with a transgender woman who has not had SRS is not being transphobic. It's just being uncomfortable showering with someone with a penis. I'd be perfectly fine showering with her if she hid it somehow.
I don't know if that makes any sense to you but yeah it's like this. I wouldn't have wanted to show that thing off when I had one and I have serious issues with someone who would call themselves a woman and want access to women's facilities who would not be discrete about having one.
HALLELUIAH !!
So TrappedPrincess, are you going to hate Jade and I both now? I agree completely with what she said.
Is this elitist and separatist all that, quite frankly yes, yes it is and the argument that male bodied "women" have equal access to female bodied women's protected spaces because they "identify" pushes me further toward the transsexual separatists movement side of thinking. Remember, we're talking barracks, communal showers, nudity.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: NavyDoc
Maybe they won't be in combat arms. The article said they are taking their time figuring this out. So it remains to be seen what they can and cannot do within the military.
I was denied as a straight male entry into the Royal navy college for simply haveing clinical depression.
Now seeing as many trans have a high rate of such disorders I expect there application denial rate to be high, unless they lower standards.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: Kojiro
a reply to: NavyDoc
It might be hypocritical, but it does happen within the transgendered community. There are a lot of different comfort levels that I've seen. I once witnessed an argument on whether transmen could use the word "tranny" like some transwomen do. These are internal problems and the community has been working hard to resolve any differences when they crop up. No one's perfect, but it's foolish to think you can use this sort of infighting as an excuse to cut loose on all of your prejudices.
Don't want to shower with a transgendered person? Fine, shower at a different time.
I didn't say I didn't. I don't care who I shower with. I've never had any modesty personally.
However, it is still hypocritical to lambaste a "cis" for being uncomfortable when you demonstrate discomfort. That's a rather basic fact.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: NavyDoc
Would you consider birth control a 'chronic medical need'?
HRT is really not any different than birth control.
originally posted by: JadeStar
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: Kojiro
a reply to: NavyDoc
It might be hypocritical, but it does happen within the transgendered community. There are a lot of different comfort levels that I've seen. I once witnessed an argument on whether transmen could use the word "tranny" like some transwomen do. These are internal problems and the community has been working hard to resolve any differences when they crop up. No one's perfect, but it's foolish to think you can use this sort of infighting as an excuse to cut loose on all of your prejudices.
Don't want to shower with a transgendered person? Fine, shower at a different time.
I didn't say I didn't. I don't care who I shower with. I've never had any modesty personally.
However, it is still hypocritical to lambaste a "cis" for being uncomfortable when you demonstrate discomfort. That's a rather basic fact.
We're talking in generalities and that never ends well.
If you gave me a specific situation, you might find that I would agree with cis women who would be uncomfortable. In other situations I would perhaps disagree.
So I can be totally fine with a trans girl who has not had SRS using the girls room at her high school as I did in mine, but also be concerned about the same situation in the context of the military.
That is not hypocritical.
originally posted by: TrappedPrincessso if you want to run along and pretend that you were born any different than I then you are free to do just that.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: JadeStar
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: Kojiro
a reply to: NavyDoc
It might be hypocritical, but it does happen within the transgendered community. There are a lot of different comfort levels that I've seen. I once witnessed an argument on whether transmen could use the word "tranny" like some transwomen do. These are internal problems and the community has been working hard to resolve any differences when they crop up. No one's perfect, but it's foolish to think you can use this sort of infighting as an excuse to cut loose on all of your prejudices.
Don't want to shower with a transgendered person? Fine, shower at a different time.
I didn't say I didn't. I don't care who I shower with. I've never had any modesty personally.
However, it is still hypocritical to lambaste a "cis" for being uncomfortable when you demonstrate discomfort. That's a rather basic fact.
We're talking in generalities and that never ends well.
If you gave me a specific situation, you might find that I would agree with cis women who would be uncomfortable. In other situations I would perhaps disagree.
So I can be totally fine with a trans girl who has not had SRS using the girls room at her high school as I did in mine, but also be concerned about the same situation in the context of the military.
That is not hypocritical.
So you would be okay if parents and "cis" girls objected to sharing facilities in a high school with a non-SRS transgender girl in highschool and understand their discomfort?
originally posted by: NavyDoc
Shrug. I think it points out that even transgender people have their prejudices and hangups which sort of indicates that non transgender people shouldn't be criticized for theirs if you guys have the same issues between each other.
originally posted by: EKron
a reply to: JadeStar
Princess has stated she has no surgical intentions. The "thinking as we do" makes us elitists in her opinion but I suspect our thinking is pretty much inline with what the majority of natal women think too?
I've tried to be nice and explain things but failed to effectively get across just what it is that is different about us that wasn't going to offend someone or come across as being stuck up or snooty. I dunno how to do it. Maybe our perspective is simply too unique to understand?
originally posted by: JadeStar
originally posted by: TrappedPrincessso if you want to run along and pretend that you were born any different than I then you are free to do just that.
Um can i give you some friendly advice.. please don't say that. like i said, i don't think anything negative about you because you could pretend to be male longer than Ekron or I. so please don't use that against us. we aren't pretending to have been born any differently than you. we just have a different perspective than you because in Ekron's case she worked for much of her life in what she calls the "pink collar ghetto". And in my case i grew up as a girl socializing with other girls.
So yes we -are- different because -our experiences are different-. You spent a lot of time around guys. I don't hold that against you but please can you maybe try to see it from our point of view? A point of view which I might add, you may end up sharing over time after SRS.
None of us is any better than the other.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: NavyDoc
Maybe they won't be in combat arms. The article said they are taking their time figuring this out. So it remains to be seen what they can and cannot do within the military.
I was denied as a straight male entry into the Royal navy college for simply haveing clinical depression.
Now seeing as many trans have a high rate of such disorders I expect there application denial rate to be high, unless they lower standards.
Which, given the political climate and the DOD response every time something along these lines come up, is the most likely scenario. Already the USMC is pressured to lower standards because no females have passed officer infantry school.