It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: johnnyjoe1979
Actually this should be a good thing for those in favor and against. Now they have what they wanted for so long and we can all have our peace and quiet. Or will the LGBT movement go global and start a crusade for love, 'liberating' all those countries which still have antigay laws?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Darth_Prime
Oh, I HEAR you DP.
Far be it from me to suggest that we "turn the other cheek."
Someone slaps me, my first tendency is to slap back harder. Or, in actuality, gut-punch; I admit I'm not much of a lady.
originally posted by: johnnyjoe1979
Actually this should be a good thing for those in favor and against. Now they have what they wanted for so long and we can all have our peace and quiet. Or will the LGBT movement go global and start a crusade for love, 'liberating' all those countries which still have antigay laws?
originally posted by: blondegiraffe
i have never understood why we feel the need to legislate a sexual preference. i personally don't care what anyone does in their free time, but i do think it is just a sexual preference, not a lifestyle and honestly, this isn't the 80's, gay people are more accepted now than people who are anti-gay or homophobic. i do agree with clarence thomas' dissent, no matter what the government does, it can't take away anyones humanity or dignity.
originally posted by: johnnyjoe1979
Or will the LGBT movement go global and start a crusade for love, 'liberating' all those countries which still have antigay laws?
originally posted by: Freenrgy2
a reply to: Darth_Prime
Yep, militant agendas are never truly satisfied. I remember raising the issue of whether or not marriage would be the ultimate goal a few years back (when Civil Unions were all the rage in the LGBT community). I was hammered when I made the point that this wouldn't be the end.
I already know what you folks want...to have your ideology recognized as being a part of every religion, even if it means destroying those intolerant religions in the process (Christianity, Judaism, etc.). You want domination, no equality in education, business, etc. You want to re-write the definition of humanity, telling us what is "normal."
Being gay is a choice, not some genetic deficiency. My brother is gay. And I love him like my brother.
Here's the scoop. All you Obamafreaks who were applauding the SCOTUS decision on Obamacare did so because 6 people decided that the folks in Congress, even though the clearly wrote the limitations of the subsidies into the law, really intended for the law to mean such and such. So, those justices allowed their bias to create new law where it didn't exist.
Now, yesterday, you have these 5 morons that exploit the 14th amendment and try and shove that BS down our throats about how this amendment really can apply to the LGBT community. No freaking way. You see, although the Constitution never explicitly says slavery was o.k., it didn't condemn it. So, people owned slaves. The country got its act together, saw how wrong it was, and AMENDED the Constitution to explicitly state that we, as a people, will support no such thing.
Marriage, in any definition, is not explicitly defined in the Constitution. The 14th amendment does not and should never apply to marriage of any kind. If we, as a people, want to define what marriage is to us in this country, then why not do it the right way and AMEND the Constitution. Get the STATES to ratify it as should be done, instead of 9 people who have a really nasty habit of creating f'ing laws out of thin air. That isn't their job!!!!!
Marriage is not the end for you and I'm pretty sure I'm not going to like what you folks try to do next. At some point, nature will correct this wrong.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Freenrgy2
Being gay is a choice
When did you make your choice not to be gay?