It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Monsterface
a reply to: Phage
Precisely, meaning different parts of the celestial sky are visible depending on the vantage point. Yes you can use basic Geometry to figure this out. I do not need to use Geometry though as I could plug my coordinates in a star chart and find this out too.
All this discussion had nothing at all to do with my original question, which I posted, corrected ( after some criticism on my false wording), and reposted.
It seems to me that there is a whole lot of controversy here and the topic itself is completely polarized making it very difficult to entertain an idea.
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” Aristotle
I thank everyone including you who have provided me with some reference points on which I may continue my quest for factual information.
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
I capture Planet X every time I take a photo at sunrise conditions permitting.
a reply to: Monsterface
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
Um your putting words in My mouth there..It is a recognized fact that there is a significant contingent of members who are imposters!
I have viewed the Sun on many occasions through My scope and as I have explained before,Mylar is what is used generally to view the Sun but this is too powerful when wanting to view PX,so a custom IR filter needs to be made,so with this in mind, why would so many amateurs have a custom designed filter and equipment looking for something that is widely claimed by mainstream to not exist?
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
I am capturing the core of PX in precisely the position Zetatalk has described
Then there’s the highly controversial, mysterious so called tenth Planet X (also sometimes known as Hircolubus or Nibiru) approaching our solar system with potential catastrophic implications. Even the Washington Post ran an article way back in 1983 chronicling the discovery of the planet estimated to be five times the size of the earth revolving around the sun in a 3600 year cycle. In 1990 researcher-author Zecharia Sitchin (The End of Days) interviewed supervising astronomer of the US Naval Observatory Robert S. Harrington to discuss Harrington’s recent discovery of the red Planet X.
As it moves closer, it’s speculated to make an oceanic splash including large sized meteoric space debris creating a strong enough force to throw the earth’s axis off kilter, causing already rising sea levels to instantly become killer tsunamis submerging underwater much of the global population that inhabits the earth’s coastlines. Nearly half the US population resides within coastal counties. A January 14, 2014 on the air early morning broadcast of a Sacramento NBC affiliate station may have inadvertently caught a partial view of Planet X silhouetted by a darkened superimposed Venus.
Researcher-activist John Moore asserts a number of his contacts have independently confirmed that a top secret meeting took place decades ago in a New Orleans briefing where a roomful of US Navy admirals were informed of the coming inevitable disaster. In response to this potential earthshaking event, emergency contingency plans have been covertly relocating the national capital from Washington DC to Denver. In preparation the financial center of New York City is also quietly moving its assets inland to higher ground. The elite has purportedly been secretly preparing for this possibility for a long time. And as usual the public always the last to know has been intentionally kept in the dark.
Foreknowledge of so many potential endgame scenarios can literally overwhelm even the healthiest and strongest among us. Then again this may also be part of the globalist agenda to intentionally leak probabilities of these disasters, using these risks emanating from science and geopolitics to saturate the public with an unlimited source of dangers that over time desensitizes us, numbing and dumbing us down so we grow complacent, passive and too docile to pay any attention to all the mounting dangers facing our troubled planet.
Just to cope with the anxiety that this harsh, sobering reality brings up, often people will utilize such defenses as denial and repression to negate and squash their overwhelming fears from consciousness in order to function daily. With survival demands only going up with each passing year as the value of our dollar only goes down, the challenge of making ends meet paying for a roof over our heads and feeding our families is becoming ever so harder to bear. Already steeped deep in debt, a shocking number of Americans (62%) are but one paycheck away from homelessness.
With daily demands becoming so frighteningly real, a majority of the US population may well be on stress overload just trying to meet the most basic of life necessities. Therefore, contemplating the current state of global alarm and danger becomes too much for them to even think about, much less take preparatory action. It’s all people can do to just financially stay afloat, much less accept the belief that end of the world is fast approaching. So by necessity, a large segment of the population cannot fathom the current dark reality descending on the earth today. The oligarchs appear to have the world population so disempowered and helpless, out of sheer fear and desperation they will simply do what their patriarchal master the federal government tells them.
this was discussed to death in countless arguments with planet ex proponents over a decade ago - why are you still beating the same dead horse
I can only reiterate that an approaching planetary-sized (and especially brown-dwarf-size) object would be visible long before it comes anywhere near us, and amateur astronomers would have picked up on it. You cannot cover up the sky.
So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a
nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that
it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the
light cast by its stars ever gets through.
"All I can tell you is that we don't know what it is," Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, IRAS chief
scientist for California's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and director of the Palomar Observatory
for the California Institute of Technology, said in an interview.
According to Dr. Mike Dworetsky, Director University of London
Observatory, "The object in question was eventually identified as
a denser knot of "interstellar cirrus" in Taurus (not in Orion but a
bit to the west) while the other objects the team were interested
in were identified as infra-red-bright galaxies."
"The object was designated as 0412+085 in Houck J.R. et al,
Astrophysical Journal Letters vol 278, p L63, 1984 and
reported as infrared cirrus in Houck, J.R. et al, Astrophysical
Journal Letters vol 290, p. L5, 1985. The other objects, as the
article stresses, were identified as very faint galaxies."
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: wildespace
I can only reiterate that an approaching planetary-sized (and especially brown-dwarf-size) object would be visible long before it comes anywhere near us, and amateur astronomers would have picked up on it. You cannot cover up the sky.
Amateur astronomer have found Nibiru, yet you and most of the debunkers are so closed minded and ignore all their data as you just have demonstrated.
originally posted by: Informer1958
Yet you give no evidence to support your rant.