ATS POLL: Who do you want as the next President of the United States

Ok, who voted for Joe Biden?

I think I speak for the vast majority when I say Vonhelton 2016! He hobnobbed with the elite and was handed picked by the far right yet he's still a man of the people. He will face Putin head on, wont put up with Islamic extremist, the real life version of the Punisher, battled demons/poltergeist, brought his dead cat back from the dead, and designed a plane while in elementary school (which lockheed martin stole from him) . Vonhelton/Mouse 2016!

Probably somebody not endorsed by the mainstream media and the entrenched two party system. I haven't figured it out yet, but likely somebody independent or involved in one of the smaller less-known political parties. So I'll be voting for somebody, even if it doesn't count for jack the way things are setup and the majority voting for the "lesser evil" instead of somebody that may actually be more representative of their own interests. (Why make compromises?)

Anyways, it's rare I see much in the way of representation as I'd see fit on most major issues but am still likely going to be taxed for it anyways. Then again I'm one of those oddballs that likes the idea of representation via sortition in the original Athenian Democratic sense, so they probably don't care about me anyways.

My prediction:

A rich bastard that is either a moderate republican or democrat and who has been to a bilderberg conference and will carry on the same policy's has Bush and Obama.

I bet a £20 donation to ATS im right

Anyone want to take that bet up?

originally posted by: Xtrozero
Ok, who voted for Joe Biden?

Maybe it was a mis-click?

Me, i could probably do the job better than the jokers
in power over there.

Seriously ... The Western Countries need Real Humans running their Countries
b-cause they're the only ones who will actually benefit from it, not the
animals in power now.


This should be the official Song for the next Election:
Every Move you make and every Vow you break 'We'll be watching You'. - The Police.

www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: Iscool

originally posted by: acehigh91
No surprise that rand paul is running away with the lead. No disrespect to any other candidate but he's probably the only real legit one, the rest are globalist corrupt dirt bags.

You obviously do not know what you are talking about...Ted Cruz is the only Constitutional, pro American, anti globalist in the bunch...Do some research on the candidates...

He's also a religious nut job, who wants to impose his religious views on everyone else.

Why else was his announcement at a Christian venue?

No thanks. He's even more divisive than the current Divider in Chief

We need a good centrist right now.

Both parties have some good ideas, but none of them get to see the light of day if we keep electing the far right or left candidates.

originally posted by: crazyewok
My prediction:

A rich bastard that is either a moderate republican or democrat and who has been to a bilderberg conference and will carry on the same policy's has Bush and Obama.

I bet a £20 donation to ATS im right

Anyone want to take that bet up?

I will take that bet but only for the part that say he has not been to a Bilderberg conference yet. whoever it end up being will attend after, but I got a feeling whoever it i has not been to one yet.

originally posted by: DYepes

originally posted by: crazyewok
My prediction:

A rich bastard that is either a moderate republican or democrat and who has been to a bilderberg conference and will carry on the same policy's has Bush and Obama.

I bet a £20 donation to ATS im right

Anyone want to take that bet up?

I will take that bet but only for the part that say he has not been to a Bilderberg conference yet. whoever it end up being will attend after, but I got a feeling whoever it i has not been to one yet.

Well only after election.

It still includes this years.

Your next president will already be picked out I bet

Bernie Sanders with Elizabeth Warren as his VP

originally posted by: ObjectZero

Maybe it was a mis-click?

God I hope so, or we are doomed as a species...

There will be no 2016 election, Obama will create chaos and claim presidency for life in a time of civil unrest that he created. Bush already implemented it along with martial law

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

There is no option for "non of the above"

I would be semi happy just to see the next prez NOT be Clinton or Bush.

That said...I have yet to see any candidate or politician that I would LIKE to see as president.

Unfortunately, those who should be prez dont want it and those who want it should not be prez.

Sorry, I initially missed the "any random person other than" which is how I voted. Not quite the same as none of the above, but close enough.

Why does everyone keep referring to it as an election?

It's quite obvious that it's an appointment with a pseudo "election" to appease the unthinking majority.

You "vote" on machines for crying out loud!

a reply to: Sparkymedic

Yes! Technology is bad!

Bad technology! Bad Tech, BAD!

The freaking problem is an electorate that is as ignorant as dirt... they may have vaguely followed a campaign or 2, they may be somewhat cognizant of what the issue are, and then they go to vote and there are 40 elections and the fools vote for people and issues that they are clueless about.

And then there are the idiots who: Vote for this guy cause he's black...vote for this guy cause he is white...vote for this woman cause she is a woman... votes for this person cause "their name sounds vaguely familiar"...votes for this person cause of their party affiliation, damn who is the best person for the job.

No need for a giant complicated conspiracy that could be exposed.... people are stupid. Nuff said.

Sylvester Stallone, Arnold Schwarzenegger or Vladamir Putin.

originally posted by: Indigent
Ron Paul 2016!!!

He is just like 80

I love 'ole Ron....he would have made an awesome president.

originally posted by: Xtrozero
Ok, who voted for Joe Biden?

Joe would throw his hat in the ring if Hillary wasn't already stamped with the Obama seal of approval. He (Joe) is probably hoping she trips and hits her head again, so he can take her place.

I think Joe would make a better President than Hillary. What say ye all?

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Xtrozero
Ok, who voted for Joe Biden?

Joe would throw his hat in the ring if Hillary wasn't already stamped with the Obama seal of approval. He (Joe) is probably hoping she trips and hits her head again, so he can take her place.

I think Joe would make a better President than Hillary. What say ye all?

Hillary is down right scary...

Joe is Joe...That is not saying much

Why don't people give a damn anymore?

Neither Ted Cruz nor Marco Rubio are eligible for presidency according to the Constitution, yet the news media and people in general just ignore the facts.

Ted Cruz is NOT a natural born citizen. Marco Rubio is NOT a natural born citizen.

The Law

U.S. Constitution

Article II, Section I
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

The Definition

"Law of Nations"
Emerich de Vattel
1785

CHAP. XIX.

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.