It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So when a gun is used to stop an attack, it proves the benefit of gun ownership but when a 13 year-old kid murders his brother with a gun (that he shouldn't have had access to imo), the gun isn't an issue?
People are the problem and certain elements of our society quite simply need to be gone.
originally posted by: Ancient Champion
Plus the mom shouldn't be so happy her son is dead.
originally posted by: soaringhawk
a reply to: Prezbo369
He was going to kill her. He was literally trying to rip her throat out. He deserved to die. He deserved everything he got and more! You're a coward or a person with a corrupt mindset yourself. You're one of the many young punks that spout of " could of shot him in the leg and disarmed him." All you ever do is watch movies and play videogames. You weren't in the situation. You don't know how the neighbor felt. He saw this woman being attacked and did what was necessary to stop the threat!
Your kind are disgusting. You care more about the criminal than the victim. I hope people like you are met by some evil and then I don't want you crying victim when no one's there to help you! You're a fool.
originally posted by: soaringhawk
a reply to: intrptr
Not me man. Only the brain dead idiots think guns are the problem. People are the problem and certain elements of our society quite simply need to be gone. They're weeds and don't deserve to live among us. Put them in hard labor. This nation has become so pussified.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: soaringhawk
People are the problem and certain elements of our society quite simply need to be gone.
Thats what they think, too. Its not guns, its the citizens that own them. Thats what they really think. Making guns the problem is cover, afer all, theres nothing wrong with being a citizen.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Prezbo369
My comment was directed solely at soaring hawk, not you.
But since you posted to me-- Wide spread ownership of hammers is a good thing too, despite that some people use them to kill.
Its important to distinguish between murder weapons and willful intent. Big difference between the two, imo.
A gun is just a thing until its used in a crime by a person with willful intent. It doesn't matter if its a gun, a car or a knife. What matters is intent. Thats what causes crime, not things people use to commit the crime with.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
Is this typical of most/all gun advocates/owners?
You actually think you (gun advocates) are under threat like the one that soaringhawk made towards me, by people such as myself that do not think widespread ownership and use of firearms is ultimately a good thing?.....
Are you purposely attempting to demonstrate and prove my point for me?...
originally posted by: DYepes
Yes, people like you are in fact a direct threat to the constitution and you would gladly welcome fascism in this country. It is people like you who will be lining up to sell their neighbors out to gun confiscation. I dont deny a gun's primary purpose is to kill. But you could just as easily use a gun to hammer a nail in like a hammer (not frequently this would be bad depending on your particular brand of tool) just as you can use a hammer to smash in someones skull and murder them.
Do not make your beliefs known publicly when they attempt to begin confiscation, you wont be around long. In that scenario you would be the equivalent to NAZI sympathizers during WW2 Poland or France.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: DYepes
Yes, people like you are in fact a direct threat to the constitution and you would gladly welcome fascism in this country. It is people like you who will be lining up to sell their neighbors out to gun confiscation. I dont deny a gun's primary purpose is to kill. But you could just as easily use a gun to hammer a nail in like a hammer (not frequently this would be bad depending on your particular brand of tool) just as you can use a hammer to smash in someones skull and murder them.
Do not make your beliefs known publicly when they attempt to begin confiscation, you wont be around long. In that scenario you would be the equivalent to NAZI sympathizers during WW2 Poland or France.
I came into this thread with a certain opinion of gun nuts, it's fair to say that opinion has been confirmed.....
Nazis? really? lol
originally posted by: Ancient Champion
Plus the mom shouldn't be so happy her son is dead.
originally posted by: Ancient Champion
He could have shot the kid in the legs and then disarmed him.
originally posted by: Ancient Champion
Plus the mom shouldn't be so happy her son is dead.