It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: mrthumpy
Check out the metabunk thread on him. Mick West is actually interviewed for the movie.
originally posted by: ATF1886
So say I were to charter a plane and collect samples and have an independent lab test samples would you be my friend then network dude and be on my side of the fence. 😂😂😉
originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: network dude
You would think by now, with all the $$ some have made off of this, that one of these 'experts' would have at least rented a plane and obtained direct samples. With legit, no agenda, competent observers.
I started a thread months ago, and actually read all the replies. I didn't just wait to argue my pre conceived opinion.
I always try to go in with an open mind and consider ALL the evidence, because in the end all I am interested in is the truth.
Why has not one of the 'believers' obtained direct samples using repeatable scientific principles?
.
originally posted by: Eunuchorn
a reply to: network dude
Exactly why I don't debate chemtrails! I will continue believing whatever I want to, & I suspect everyone else will do the same, haha
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Eunuchorn
a reply to: network dude
Exactly why I don't debate chemtrails! I will continue believing whatever I want to, & I suspect everyone else will do the same, haha
I know, evidence be damned! You will let me know when they start playing old Clint Eastwood westerns on your sky screen right?
originally posted by: thorfourwinds
as well as from the use of Barium as an atmospheric aerosol spray for enhancing/refracting the signaling of radio/radar waves along military jet flight paths, missile test ranges, etc.
"an atmospheric aerosol spray for enhancing/refracting the signaling of radio/radar waves along military jet flight paths, missile test ranges, etc. "
Comment:
This National Institute of Health document just described the U.S. Navy barium chemtrail aerosol program called:
"Variable Terrain Radio Parabolic Equation"
VTRPE
sub program,
within the
"Radio Frequency Mission Planner"
RFMP
U.S. Navy warfare system
(The chemtrail aerosol spraying program began with the top secret U.S. Navy RFMP/VTRPE aerosol program, spraying a mixture of barium into our atmosphere from aircraft. The chemtrail program is associated with
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.)
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: anton74
Just NO! if you kill him, you might never find the beer. there is a limit to how crazy we are allowed to get. I have to draw the line there. Now, I have to go feed the unicorn, let all just play nice and leave the shotgun behind the door.
originally posted by: thorfourwinds
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION
"Variable Terrain Radio Parabolic Equation"
VTRPE
sub program,
within the
"Radio Frequency Mission Planner"
RFMP
U.S. Navy warfare system
(The chemtrail aerosol spraying program began with the top secret U.S. Navy RFMP/VTRPE aerosol program, spraying a mixture of barium into our atmosphere from aircraft. The chemtrail program is associated with
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.)
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: mrthumpy
It looks like it was a Rense link. Super credible.
originally posted by: network dude
In any debate, there are points made, and rebuttals to those points. From the "I don't believe in chemtrails" side, we MUST examine the evidence presented or there is no debate to be had. Every video, every move, every PDF article, and every patent presented as evidence. They all must be looked at, understood, and discussed.
So why do the chemtrailers get a pass? To lazy to look at what is presented? Or is is the source just isn't one you like?
I ask this as I look at yet another thread where the same easily explained things are trotted out as reasons to believe in chemtrails. Why do some planes leave trails when others do not? What's up with the grid things? What about cloud seeding? What about Bill Gates and his foundation?
I do get that new people will be introduced to this theory from time to time. But some of who I see making these claims have been around for a while. They have participated in other chemtrail threads.
The science that explains those white puffy lines in the sky exists, is massive, and it's undisputed. But....you do have to read it for it to have any impact on your thinking.
but, is that the hangup? Fear of having the theory unravel? Fear that you have been wrong?
At least spend the few moments to look at the information presented. Someone thought enough of you to present it.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: thorfourwinds
as well as from the use of Barium as an atmospheric aerosol spray for enhancing/refracting the signaling of radio/radar waves along military jet flight paths, missile test ranges, etc.
"an atmospheric aerosol spray for enhancing/refracting the signaling of radio/radar waves along military jet flight paths, missile test ranges, etc. "
Comment:
This National Institute of Health document just described the U.S. Navy barium chemtrail aerosol program called:
"Variable Terrain Radio Parabolic Equation"
VTRPE
sub program,
within the
"Radio Frequency Mission Planner"
RFMP
U.S. Navy warfare system
(The chemtrail aerosol spraying program began with the top secret U.S. Navy RFMP/VTRPE aerosol program, spraying a mixture of barium into our atmosphere from aircraft. The chemtrail program is associated with
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.)
Please show what evidence you have found to prove that.
I am well aware of the levels of Barium, aluminum, and strontium in soil and even understand how they become airborne, but I have never seen anything other than guesses about aerial spraying.
If you can prove it, then it's the smoking gun.
If you can't, then it's the same old fantasy.
I am well aware of the levels of Barium, aluminum, and strontium in soil...
If you can prove it, then it's the smoking gun.