It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: Rhiannon
But that is not true anymore in our country's case. We respect that the native americans have just as much rights or more than we do to be here. But cant change history now, we are all here now. The Nez Perce tribe have become great capitalists (casinos, fisheries, tourist), great social programs, good schools. Netty said he does not want a two state solution at all. Can't work with that.
and ye may begin without to stand, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, lord, open to us, and he answering shall say to you, I have not known you whence ye are, 26 then ye may begin to say, We did eat before thee, and did drink, and in our broad places thou didst teach; 27 and he shall say, I say to you, I have not known you whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of the unrighteousness. 28 'There shall be there the weeping and the gnashing of the teeth, when ye may see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the reign of God, and yourselves being cast out without;
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: voyger2
Let's not get ahead of ourselves and jump to conclusions, and just be patient and see what happens.
I seriously doubt Israel will launch any new military offensive if Hammas doesn't provoke them first by doing anything stupid.
Oh please Israel has been caught launching rockets from Gaza and then blaming it on Hamas to give them a reason to attack. Anyone that trusts Benny is a fool.
It gets worse. In 2002, Israel was caught trying to set up an "Al-Qaeda" cell in Palestinian lands, so they could blame Arafat & use it as an excuse to finally crush him.
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: voyger2
Let's not get ahead of ourselves and jump to conclusions, and just be patient and see what happens.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: poncho1982
Oh here we go. Another "Let's all bash Israel, because it's the 'in' thing to do right now."
BN did say there would be no 2 state solution while he is PM. True. BUT he has always said that a 2 state solution is his wish, but it would only happen WITHOUT Hamas.
Hamas is the one stalling the process. All they would have to do is STOP attacking, and they would get their precious Palestinian State.
Pretty simple if you ask me.
Is Israel innocent? No. Are ANY of us innocent? No.
But the key to making this ALL go away is disbanding Hamas. But, they won't disband, and BN knows this, hence his statement.
In context people, keep things in context.
I think what your seeing is the transition back to before it was the "in thing" to let Israel get away with what ever it wanted. Cause, you know, after a few thousand unjustifiable homicides, people are starting to feel Israel does not deserve it's popularity and should maybe come back down to earth with the rest of us and face her crimes.
We have developed a resistance to the drugs Israel has been doping the world with. We can see clearly now.
originally posted by: poncho1982
You mean, Israel can't protect it's right to exist?
Interesting. They have this tiny sliver of land, surrounded by a sea of enemies, and THEY are the bad guys.
No, it is definitely the in thing to bash Israel right now. Because the right thing is to support a country that just wants to exist, without being under constant attack.
But, it's OK if you want to ignore history, that's your choice. And another "in thing" right now is to do just that. People only want to look back into history to a point that supports their opinion, and stop right there.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: poncho1982
You mean, Israel can't protect it's right to exist?
Israel cannot protect - for themselves - another peoples land that was taken through military annexation. The excuse that Israel was attacked so they decided to keep the land of the attackers is not a legal defense. That is how violent gangs act over turf, not civilized nations in the modern world.
Interesting. They have this tiny sliver of land, surrounded by a sea of enemies, and THEY are the bad guys.
No. all that is left of PALESTINE is a tiny sliver of land. Zionist first bribed, terrorized, assassinated and even offered their service to HITLER to obtain that land. Yes that would make them bad guys, no doubt about it.
No, it is definitely the in thing to bash Israel right now. Because the right thing is to support a country that just wants to exist, without being under constant attack.
Yes, the right thing to do is to support a nation that just wants to exist. Palestine has almost been completely wiped off the map by Israel and Palestine deserves your support.
But, it's OK if you want to ignore history, that's your choice. And another "in thing" right now is to do just that. People only want to look back into history to a point that supports their opinion, and stop right there.
There is no need to understand history if you just follow international law that was established before Israels recent existence. Nobody cares about holy claims. Just the law.
originally posted by: poncho1982
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: poncho1982
You mean, Israel can't protect it's right to exist?
Israel cannot protect - for themselves - another peoples land that was taken through military annexation. The excuse that Israel was attacked so they decided to keep the land of the attackers is not a legal defense. That is how violent gangs act over turf, not civilized nations in the modern world.
Interesting. They have this tiny sliver of land, surrounded by a sea of enemies, and THEY are the bad guys.
No. all that is left of PALESTINE is a tiny sliver of land. Zionist first bribed, terrorized, assassinated and even offered their service to HITLER to obtain that land. Yes that would make them bad guys, no doubt about it.
No, it is definitely the in thing to bash Israel right now. Because the right thing is to support a country that just wants to exist, without being under constant attack.
Yes, the right thing to do is to support a nation that just wants to exist. Palestine has almost been completely wiped off the map by Israel and Palestine deserves your support.
But, it's OK if you want to ignore history, that's your choice. And another "in thing" right now is to do just that. People only want to look back into history to a point that supports their opinion, and stop right there.
There is no need to understand history if you just follow international law that was established before Israels recent existence. Nobody cares about holy claims. Just the law.
And...there it is. So, even though Palestinians claim Historical rights, as well as Israelis, you only care about LAW. OK, well, how about the UN giving the land to Israel. That was the world majority speaking there.
Thank you for proving my point. I couldn't have done it better.
originally posted by: voyger2
The Israeli electorate had a choice to make. By re-electing a leader who publicly reneged on his commitments to peace and a two-state solution, they voted against peace. What remains now is how the Palestinians and the world will react to the closure of the charade that was called the peace process.
Quote from source:
« Palestinians have for years lost hope in the peace process and have been telling everyone who is willing to listen that the Israeli leaders are merely giving lip service to it as their own bulldozers were gobbling up Palestinian lands. The world kept on believing in the lip service until the Israeli public forced their leader to state his case in Hebrew to his own people. Now that we know that Israel is not a democracy to all its citizens (see Netanyahu's racist comments about Arab citizens) and Netanyahu never meant his commitment to a Palestinian state, the world must react.»
Quote from source:
«The efforts by the UN's non-member state of Palestine to pursue Israel in the International Criminal Court must now be seen as a positive nonviolent act that is much kinder to Israel than what should happen to an occupying power. Instead of criticizing Palestine, the US and other western countries must praise the actions of Mahmoud Abbas as a moderate peaceful alternative to various offers of resistance.»
Christiane Amanpour said on CNN Tuesday:
without support for a Palestinian state, the Israeli leader is offering no alternative except for an apartheid-like situation where four million Palestinian under Israeli military control have no political rights.
Attempts to say that the conflict can be resolved if both parties just sit down and talk was based on the assumption that Israel is a democratic state for all its citizens and thus can't accept to politically disenfranchise another people and that the state of Israel accepts to replace the occupation with an independent Palestinian state. Both these assumptions have been wiped by Netanyahu and therefore Palestinians are no longer bound by the need to continue to pretend that the conflict can be solved simply through direct Palestinian-Israeli engagement.
The role and the responsibilities of the international community to resolve a conflict that all agree has poisoned the air in the Middle East region is now paramount. It is no longer acceptable that international instruments such as the Security Council and the International Criminal Court be disabled in favor of Israel. No one country should be allowed to be above international law. And Israel has now lost any chance of world powers protecting it from international justice.
World No Longer Bound to Defend Israel Internationally
Whats your opinion ATS?
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Annunak1
And we forget that what started it all was Hammas bombing of Israel from civilian locations( hiding themselves in hospitals etc ) and therefore provoking their reaction, almost like anticipating it.
originally posted by: OpenMindedRealist
Not sure why Obama is so upset about this election. It has given Israel-haters an excuse to condemn the Israeli people along with Netanyahu.
Guess that means you guys don't have to follow up your anti-semitism with the 'I don't hate all Jews, just the Zionists' disclaimer. Because the only good Jew is the one who votes to give up his land, am I wrong?
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: buster2010
And the biggest one is the United States of America, and I don't see people here demonizing the ordinary American, just their governments.
In my honest opinion, the hate against Jews is stronger now, than it has been during nazi times. People just mask it with saying they actually hate Zionists.
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: buster2010
Funny how you go back in history but ignore how the Romans kicked the Jews out in around 70 AD...
So was it right for the Romans to kick the Jews out then? So it could essentially be said that the Palestinians took advantage of the Jews being kicked out of their land just as the Americans did with the Native Americans.
I mean... really? This back and forth could go on and on and on.