Rumor: Putin Has Been Neutralized by a "Stealthy Coup" - Opening Post Updated 9x - Putin Found

originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
it's been rumored for days, now confirmed

The confirmation of Zolotov's killing has so far only been "Moscow Sources" in a Ukrainian newspaper story. Not quite good enough. There's certainly lots of smoke, not sure about the fire yet.

originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
Viktor Zolotov dead

it's been rumored for days, now confirmed

N/M...

a reply to: Bigburgh

Виктор Золотов. Фото: amic.ru

15-03-2015 (13:36)


Media reports of the death of Putin's bodyguard General Zolotov
update: 15-03-2015 (20:25)

Media, bloggers and users of social networks provide information on the death of the chief bodyguard of Russian President General Viktor Zolotov. In particular, the Ukrainian blogger Alexei Mochanov confirmed the death of comrade Putin on the newspaper's website Obozrevatel.ua .

originally posted by: Bigburgh

originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
Viktor Zolotov dead

it's been rumored for days, now confirmed

Holy F###! SOMEBODY TRANSLATE THAT!

Media reports of the death of Putin's bodyguard General Zolotov

That should be a translation of the article.

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

True, albeit the source is a Ukrainian news reporter:

uapres s.info Google translation

a reply to: Blackmarketeer

But even though I cant read Russian the article was dated yesterday and yet still no mention of it on BBC or Fox or wherever MSM lies today?

a reply to: Phage


Thanks Phage.

Thanks everyone.

a reply to: Bigburgh
Just part of the storm.

a reply to: Forensick

Because the "confirmation" doesn't meet what so-called standards of confirmation remain in mainstream media.

There may also be a reluctance to take any aspect of this story seriously.

originally posted by: Forensick
a reply to: Blackmarketeer

But even though I cant read Russian the article was dated yesterday and yet still no mention of it on BBC or Fox or wherever MSM lies today?

It's from 2 hours ago.

At this point, no official Russian media sources appear to be reporting ANYTHING. The best sources IMHO are the tweets sent from people with knowledge of Kremlin inner circles.

a reply to: Blackmarketeer

Ah yes,
Because as we all know, lacking any real information, rumor rules.

It is after all the basis of the ATS motto.

a reply to: Phage

The horse is dead Phage, I think you can stop beating it.

originally posted by: Phage
Because as we all know, lacking any real information, rumor rules.
It is after all the basis of the ATS motto.

Seriously?

You've shown repeated disdain for this thread -- original coverage of the overwhelming flood of information, coming in via social media, regarding the instability and uncertainty surrounding Putin's absence.

Face it, Social Media, and in this case Twitter, has become "the people's" news wire. If you can't deal with that, then you may as well pull the plug and get off the Internet now. It's how information dispersal is evolving, for better or worse. The only way to be certain we can weigh in on the "for the better" side of that equation is through collaborative threads that analyze the firehose of data, like this one.


It's unfortunate you show such knee-jerk scorn for this thread, and the intentions of using Twitter as both an information source, and dissemination medium. But the story is the story. And if you're unable to adapt, please, don't spread your sour grapes for the rest of us to step on.

If (and a big If) it's true, do these people have enough intelligence not to press buttons>?

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

But the story is the story. And if you're unable to adapt, please, don't spread your sour grapes for the rest of us to step on.

Ah. It's the story that's the thing then.
Not facts. Sorry, I misunderstood. I admit it. I'm a dinosaur when it comes to things like verifiable information in lieu of facts by number of youtube hits.

aloha

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SkepticOverlord

But the story is the story. And if you're unable to adapt, please, don't spread your sour grapes for the rest of us to step on.

Ah. It's the story that's the thing then.
Not facts. Sorry, I misunderstood. I admit it. I'm a dinosaur when it comes to things like verifiable information in lieu of facts by number of youtube hits.

aloha

Are we to completely ignore this until Fox or MSN tells us it is ok to speak about it? Then believe only what they approve for us to believe?

Why are you even here?

Nevermind, I was mistaken.

What a time to have just read Snow Wolf [novel about secret assassination of Stalin]

originally posted by: autopat51
i wonder..will it totally collapse in a matter of seconds?

Dont all buildings that weren't hit by planes collapse thusly?

originally posted by: SkepticOverlord

originally posted by: Phage
Because as we all know, lacking any real information, rumor rules.
It is after all the basis of the ATS motto.

Seriously?

You've shown repeated disdain for this thread -- original coverage of the overwhelming flood of information, coming in via social media, regarding the instability and uncertainty surrounding Putin's absence.

Face it, Social Media, and in this case Twitter, has become "the people's" news wire. If you can't deal with that, then you may as well pull the plug and get off the Internet now. It's how information dispersal is evolving, for better or worse. The only way to be certain we can weigh in on the "for the better" side of that equation is through collaborative threads that analyze the firehose of data, like this one.


It's unfortunate you show such knee-jerk scorn for this thread, and the intentions of using Twitter as both an information source, and dissemination medium. But the story is the story. And if you're unable to adapt, please, don't spread your sour grapes for the rest of us to step on.

Phage he has a point. Twitter is the back fence where gossip rules and is not the peoples' news…god forbid if it ever is. No one has their reputation on the line and no one has proof of what they say. The sources are not even close to the inner circle either. All Phage is saying is the situation is interesting and to wait for confirmation. Really that's all we can do.

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

I wouldn't be to worried about loose nukes. From what I've been able to ascertain from people that would know -- there are highly secretive teams that make sure nukes don't wind up in the wrong hands. We're talking "don't exist" types of secret teams.