It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you are going to discredit the bible then you undermine your own Qur'an. If there is no truth in it what so ever then the story of Jesus is no use either. Besides the bible and maybe Josephus there is no real record of him. This is before the Qur'an.
Mohammed was illiterate so how did he get these stories, he heard them and past them on. He is the only so called prophet that didn't do any miracles and was possessed by a demon.
The Qur'an was only written after his death. Yet you are saying it is the same god through out the bible and the Qur'an. This almighty being can't seem to communicate clearly and loves picking sides or both books are man made. Just like the Mormon prophet Joseph smith made the book of Mormon.
Jesus coming back to destroy crosses and get rid of pigs? Didn't Allah create pigs so what did the pig ever do. The whole story seems made up and skewed in your favour.
biblehub.com...
Matthew 7:22 - 23
Many will say to Me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?' 23"And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; DEPART FROM ME, YOU WHO PRACTICE LAWLESSNESS.
Just like the Mormons it is skewed in their favour and the second coming of Jesus is in Missouri. Both stories are implausible.
I'm keeping my beer and bacon.
originally posted by: MstWntd
a reply to: Created
For you to push the agenda of the Quran having changes after i have provided you with the process of how it was originated and then strictly standardised in accordance to authority provided by the source itself, is just either a clear depiction of your attempts to defame the integrity of the Quran or you are fundamentally unset when it comes to processing information. In either case I am quite disheartened to talk with you.. but I'll see how this continues..
And many different sects of different understandings thanks to wiki cite.
Sunni:The largest sect.
Shia:The second largest.
Sufism:The next one.
And there is others.
Yes there are different sects with different understanding.. for example I write "1 + 1 = 2", You might understand me as saying "11 is equal to 2".. but that doesn't mean there's different versions of what I write.. that means theres different understanding according to certain people..
The Quran has lots of changes through different translations, that even has different sect of Muslims.
If they are changes in translations then that does not mean the Quran has changes.. that means that the translations have changs.. which makes sense because A) a persons understanding of Arabic and English might (actually most definitely) differ from translator to translator and B) The language changes with time, so a translation now wont be the same as a translation 100 years ago..
This does not mean that the Quran has changed, there is no two Qurans that contain a difference in Arabic once you compare them.. for you to try and put this point forward in translations of the Quran is intellectual dishonesty..
In all citations you mentioned there is no difference in message, context, or meaning. The only difference is use of language and that too is not the Arabic language in which the Quran originates in
What your doing is a classic example of clutching at the straw man.. its either that or I have to assume you have a primary school understanding of the English language..
originally posted by: celticdog
a reply to: MstWntd
I have read that Mohammed was illiterate and have read that he was literate. He wrote the marriage contract to Aisha. then I read this.
Sura 7:157: "Those who follow the apostle, the unlettered Prophet,whom they find mentioned in their own (scriptures) in the law and the Gospel".
unlettered to me means illiterate. I don't know if it is how it is translated or what. Also I have read that some Muslims say that to that he was illiterate then it says Mohammed encouraged them to read and write. What to believe?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: celticdog
We can be friends with Christians and Jews...
That "infamous" verse of "intolerance" is in reference to Christians and Jews who were deceivers, or backstabbers, at that specific time in history.
Not all Jews & Christians, just the ones who were being deceptive, despite a Treaty between them and the Muslims.
Context is important.
originally posted by: celticdog
a reply to: MstWntd
I have read that Mohammed was illiterate and have read that he was literate. He wrote the marriage contract to Aisha.
then I read this.
Sura 7:157: "Those who follow the apostle, the unlettered Prophet,whom they find mentioned in their own (scriptures) in the law and the Gospel".
unlettered to me means illiterate. I don't know if it is how it is translated or what. Also I have read that some Muslims say that to that he was illiterate then it says Mohammed encouraged them to read and write. What to believe?
as for alcohol in the bible it has both positive and negative points. It is not against it, maybe you should actually look into the bible a bit more. You are doing the same thing with the bible you accuse me of doing with the Quran.
Ephesians 5:18 ESV / 167 helpful votes
And do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery, but be filled with the Spirit,
Proverbs 20:1 ESV / 141 helpful votes
Wine is a mocker, strong drink a brawler, and whoever is led astray by it is not wise.
Galatians 5:21 ESV / 96 helpful votes
Envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
1 Peter 5:8 ESV / 71 helpful votes
Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.
1 Corinthians 6:10 ESV / 62 helpful votes
Nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
Proverbs 23:29-35 ESV / 60 helpful votes
Who has woe? Who has sorrow? Who has strife? Who has complaining? Who has wounds without cause? Who has redness of eyes? Those who tarry long over wine; those who go to try mixed wine. Do not look at wine when it is red, when it sparkles in the cup and goes down smoothly. In the end it bites like a serpent and stings like an adder. Your eyes will see strange things, and your heart utter perverse things. ...
Proverbs 23:20-21 ESV / 55 helpful votes
Be not among drunkards or among gluttonous eaters of meat, for the drunkard and the glutton will come to poverty, and slumber will clothe them with rags.
it says not to drink too much or join those that do. After the flood Noah got drunk. Lot's daughters got him drunk.
Wine is used in festivals and is kept in the temple. Jesus turn water into wine and wine was used at the last supper. The parable of the workers in the vineyard. There are lot more references to wine.
as for pigs Jesus cast demons in to them. As for the taste of bacon being close to human flesh I don't know about that.
originally posted by: celticdog
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs
I know Christians have their crazies but ISIS is on a whole other level. I get that you have to defend your faith but there has to be part of you that is embarrassed to be Muslim because of them. Any way I have learned a lot so cheers mate keep the faith.
Nay, but We hurl the true against the false, and it doth break its head and lo! it vanisheth. And yours will be woe for that which ye ascribe (unto Him).
Below is pure non duality where killings cannot be justified at all. What a Muslim sent me Quran 5:32 said
originally posted by: [post=19020056]LittleByLittle
originally posted by: AinElohim
Below is pure non duality where killings cannot be justified at all. What a Muslim sent me Quran 5:32 said
originally posted by: [post=19020056]LittleByLittle
the only innocence in Islamic theism would be a clean and pure Muslin. Therefore murder is justified.