1500 Year Old Bible Found, nobody want's to know - Could be real deal

a reply to: RedParrotHead

People who have faith, read a book, whatever religion, will not take this book serious.
I know this as fact. It could translate to amazing things (Check my last comment) yet it will be dismissed.
And if someone found a book written by Jesus it would be dismissed also, well depending on what was written.
Did he have sex while not married? That version would be shot..
If it was "As said" people would embrace it.

I think...

a reply to: shauny

Just because this may be a legitimate, authentic "bible" doesn't mean what it says is legitimate. The way our modern Bibles are translated involves an enormous amount of textual criticism that involves the tedious comparing of thousands of manuscripts. If you have 100 manuscripts from all over the known world of Biblical times, and 97 of them agree, while 3 of them do not, then it is safe to say that the 3 that do not were corrupted or copied wrong or whatever, therefore those 3 do not get considered as credible or legitimate when translating the Bible. This book in the OP, if it doesn't agree with the overwhelming, vast majority of manuscripts and codices that have already been discovered and studied then all we have here is a 1500 year old piece of garbage.

To use an analogy from contemporary times, imagine if 1000 people saved the newspaper from the day after 9/11 with the headline "World Trade Center Attacked!!" Let's pretend that out of those 1000 papers, 7 of them made a mistake when printing and the headline said "Empire State Building Attacked!!" 2000 years from now, when archaeologists start digging and find a few copies of these papers, they may find the incorrect papers first, and therefore conclude that the Empire State building was attacked, but over the course of a few years of digging, they find more and more papers, until eventually they have all 1000 or even 850 and all of them but a few say "World Trade Center Attacked!!" It would then be very easy to conclude that the few they have with "Empire State Building" are wrong and have no credibility.

a reply to: jaffo

That was a tad harsh. I write for a living buddy.
I claim nothing. I wrote this when it broke and added it here, it's being debated
I write about 10 different things depending on the news.
I assume nor say anything here.

Like every single comment on religion and any religious book.
It is guesswork, not one person in this thread can say anything is true.
So how can I? I don't.

Had you read more comments you will have read..
1. I allow opinions.
2. I don't cast stones
3. I respect the will of everyone
4. I don't debate hate
5. I love Scotland

Funny how religious folks say 'Religion doesn't cause the World to be at War"
Then I read this thread and see exactly that, almost hatred.
I side step hatred and anger. Pointless.

Cheers

a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

Check my signature.
I research all this and more for a living.
I am more than aware my friend.

Cheers

a reply to: Grimpachi

I am guessing none buddy.
I just found it really cool to research it all at the time

a reply to: hearows

Probably minimal..lol

a reply to: zazzafrazz

What about an episode of 'Dora the explorer'?
I got 2 wee girls 4/5 and it's ALL the watch.

......Just saying.

a reply to: ralfellis

Got a link my friend? I would be interested

The Bible is the inspired word of God by the Holy Spirit.

a reply to: ccseagull

Which parts of which bibles ?

a reply to: Chronogoblin

Yes, I have answered this a few times now my friend.
I research this for food

Islam and USA

I ask people read, listen and research before calling it "rubbish"
It may be, but my research took me to a few doors I can't now close.

Long story

a reply to: shauny

There is love out there that never tops out the way
love for another human being does.
You need only look for it. I know because I
found it. And it isn't a bad thing at all.

a reply to: soulfire

Yeah and that was the debate when I first wrote it and kinda not the debate now...

Cheers

a reply to: gmoneystunt

Yeah I presumed it would have been posted but we are on page what? 14
So many didn't know. I have been here 10+ years and seen things debated several times.
New members, people didn't see it first time..

Cheers

a reply to: Indigo5

Can you show me where I said I think this version invalidates the current Bible..
From my point of view all bibles are books that need faith to believe
This book be it real, fake, made of chocolate, whatever, would be the same to me.

I just find it REALLY interesting.
I wrote about it several months ago where I write..
Thought I would air it here...
Decent chat..

a reply to: OptimusSubprime

For me no books of religion are true.
You need faith to believe in the content and what it points you to.

As I have said, I believe in God.
I read no book, give money to no people and go into no building.

I respect opinions. Do I agree all the time? No..
But I don't disrespect people. Idiots do that..

a reply to: randyvs

Let me share with you something I did earlier today here in Scotland.
I am disabled badly, so often I can't write, so I do Audio blogs/articles.

Cheers..

What I think love is

a reply to: shauny

Anyway, what y’all think?

I think that's absolutely tremendous Shauny!
And certainly only adds to what I'm say'n.
Good for you man. And good on you Shauny!

a reply to: OptimusSubprime

but, in your hypothetical, what if they also found hundreds of documents that discuss how 9/11 was an inside job?

How convenient that this predicts the coming of Mohammed, the greatest fraud outside the serpent in Eden. It didn't predict Mohammed 3,000 years ago, but approx 1500 years ago, which is approx the time of Mohammed? Yeah, nothing unlikely about that coincidence.

This is likely created by Mohammed's posse after they started their little cult of debauchery and slavery.

Steering back on track, a bit.

Is there forensic data from when the book was analyzed and I am sure, carbon-14 dated? Surely, leather is a great C14 candidate, but I was interested in what was analyzed about the gold ink, it's chemical make-up, and if they did any SEM analysis of how the written text overlayed the leather. I know that many fraudulent discoveries were turned up by SEM analysis on old documents, because it showed that the writing was layed down over the patina, or aging of the surface, which showed that the writing was recent, done on old material.

Anyway, wonder if there is data that could be read about that. Thanks... Great Thread