It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shaneslaughta
Idiot parents. I lived less than 3 blocks from the school i went to when i was a kid. I couldn't walk there till i was 12.
A freaking mile? ALONE???
HANG THEM!
originally posted by: shaneslaughta
a reply to: TonyS
Yes sir. People just want to pull the old ostrich trick. Bury your head in the sand, if i cant see it its not there.
HAAAAA
How about all the girls and boys that have been raped and are to embarrassed to come forward.
In my short lifetime in my town Ive had Mexicans running a teenage prostitution ring and a martial arts instructor who liked to pay little boys with drugs and money for sexual favors.
This place i live dont have more than 12k people.
originally posted by: Spider879
I have mixed feelings on this as a 10 yrs old I rode the NYC subways alone which can be a danger in itself but I never felt fearful,but think about the fact that the world is full of monsters who prey on the young,imagine the self blame if the kids came-up missing what if I had just picked them up from school we were told and we tell our kids never to accept gifts from strangers or a ride from a seemingly kind stranger yet we scuff at the idea that a 10 and 6 yrs old is not free to walk a mile from school.
chalk it up to the times we live in.
originally posted by: shaneslaughta
a reply to: deadeyedick
I understand, i guess it was a bad way to go about it. I have some serious issues with explaining things to people, but its perfect in my head.
I guess what i was getting at was that if your letting your 6 year old run loose you are a flipping nut job. Even with a ten year old, they dont know everything about the world. Its just not safe no matter what you feel about your neighborhood.
That old saying snip happens. Then you gotta live with your choices.
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: shaneslaughta
a reply to: deadeyedick
I understand, i guess it was a bad way to go about it. I have some serious issues with explaining things to people, but its perfect in my head.
I guess what i was getting at was that if your letting your 6 year old run loose you are a flipping nut job. Even with a ten year old, they dont know everything about the world. Its just not safe no matter what you feel about your neighborhood.
That old saying snip happens. Then you gotta live with your choices.
I have to agree with you. I've never met a 10-year-old who couldn't have been conned by a sophisticated adult with a good story (ie. "You Mom just sent me to pick you up. Your Daddy was in an accident and I'm supposed to take you to the hospital."). There are predators out there. Are the odds better that a predator would not snatch the kids? Probably, but this isn't a situation in which I'd choose to play the odds. Free-range kids? The term is strangely appropriate. They're free-range until they're harvested.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: shaneslaughta
a reply to: deadeyedick
I understand, i guess it was a bad way to go about it. I have some serious issues with explaining things to people, but its perfect in my head.
I guess what i was getting at was that if your letting your 6 year old run loose you are a flipping nut job. Even with a ten year old, they dont know everything about the world. Its just not safe no matter what you feel about your neighborhood.
That old saying snip happens. Then you gotta live with your choices.
I have to agree with you. I've never met a 10-year-old who couldn't have been conned by a sophisticated adult with a good story (ie. "You Mom just sent me to pick you up. Your Daddy was in an accident and I'm supposed to take you to the hospital."). There are predators out there. Are the odds better that a predator would not snatch the kids? Probably, but this isn't a situation in which I'd choose to play the odds. Free-range kids? The term is strangely appropriate. They're free-range until they're harvested.
And that's the difference between the parenting of our years, and today. I'd have never fallen for something so obviously bogus, we had checklist questions just in case ("What's mom/dad's middle name, place of work, car model, birthday, etc") We never had to fall back on that, but it's something few seem to think of doing in today's helicopter parent world. Blame the hyper-protective on being dunces, not the kids.
originally posted by: shaneslaughta
Children that young don't have any concept of the true dangers that lurk around the world.
Pedophiles and rapists and murders are everywhere. Don't any of you watch the news?
I hate the nanny state but i can understand this.
originally posted by: shaneslaughta
a reply to: wilhelmina
thanks for another great point. Children aren't even sacred in the church.