It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jinni73
a reply to: Pardon?
no im not making things up but I am trying to learn more which is why I keep asking ill get my sources for the air pollution
all I want to do is to learn so if one guy says this way works I want to know if it does or not and when people just don't offer reasons it pisses me off I don't know enough, most people don't have the answers so I will now go away and study what you have showed me I will also talk to the author and find out his viewpoint. as surely its better to work out it the liver can be regenerated which obviously looks like you are right
Yep I live in Sydney.
I'm saying criminal behaviour is linked to the reasoning part of your brain which is located in the frontal lobe if it is fully developed then you are able to better judge what right and wrong is if it is damaged you have difficulty in right and wrong decisions and socio economics is related to money less money poorer quality diet
originally posted by: dominicus
The typical order of the atomic vibrations frequencies is 1013 Hz, and that of the amplitudes is 10-11 m.
Ancient Rishis have said you take on the karma of the animal you eat...
Meat has a very low vibration. On a continuum of lower vibrations, fish, chicken, lamb, beef, and finally pork have increasingly lower vibrations and their energy is very dark, dense and congested. Through the centuries it has been observed that vegetarians have a more refined etheric body and brighter aura. A vegetarian whose etheric body is brighter and healthier will generally heal at much faster rate than those who are not vegetarian.
I really don't believe that you're telling the truth.
You're not are you?
You've proved that with your "anecdotes" regarding colloidal silver and Lipo C.
Especially since you've even mentioned colloidal silver.
And anecdotes never constitute proof, merely evidence and that's tenuous at the best of times but you would know
but you would know that being a quantum physicist/physician's-friend/shaman/healer etc wouldn't you?
And as I stated, that's QM vibrations. It's where we get IR and microwave spectroscopy from. And those vibrations are not subject to happy thoughts, or clean living, or vegetarianism. So you don't have "high vibrations" or "low vibrations" or "good vibrations". You might get vibrations characteristic of scissoring of a hydrogen atom, or those of rotation of a water molecule. And those would be a set value, forever, regardless of karma or enlightenment.
If they believe meat or vegetables "vibrate" in that way, then they've been wrong a loooooooooong time, as well.
This in particular is pure woo. If you're trying to cite QM vibrations as you did, you can't also cite this as fact, because the "vibrations" in this bit are New Age or Theosophy "vibrations", which are not actually real in any way.
Like aurae, and etheric bodies. Also, the use of "energy" in this context is New Age, which doesn't match the concept from physics. Syncretism with Theosophy and physics was no doubt what Blavatsky intended, but it's purest bull#.
originally posted by: dominicus
And you know this how? Have you tested if karma or enlightenment exists? Do you know what if any effect observation itself has on QM vibrations? Have you tested if anything at all does or doesn't have an effect on QM vibrations, when just not too long ago you said:
If they believe meat or vegetables "vibrate" in that way, then they've been wrong a loooooooooong time, as well.
But no you are agreeing that there are QM vibrations, which also happened to be inherent in the meat or vegetables yes?
How do you know for sure? QM vibrations are a recent discovery, so who's to say that some new vibrations won't be discovered in the next 50 years that say your wrong? And what about atomic density which is relative. Water less, Steel more. That density could be said to be of a specific rate. Is the density of vegetables the same as meat?
Auras and etheric bodies have yet to be proven scientifically if they are real or not. Good luck coming up with the proper instruments to measure those, let alone consciousness
originally posted by: jinni73
a reply to: GrantedBail
I've asked the author of the detox to come on and explain himself but so far no show, just because the pharmaceutical industry say its inoperable does not mean that other ways can't be used as Pardon says you first have to stop putting poisons into your body.
the lemon and lime clean the liver and produce 6 enzymes, ginger has about 8 different substances that work directly on the liver, coffee taken as an enema goes up the hemorroidal tube and cleans the liver you need to do two a day one to stimulate the cleansing action and then 6 hours later to grab the toxins only do once a week and always do a water enema with distilled water before the coffee enema only use distilled water and add an electrolyte into it sea salt is fine but not himalayan
these things cannot hurt you to try where as the thought that nothing can work will hurt you the hyperbaric oxygen chamber has a remarkable effect on the body even acupuncture clears blockages to help with things.
The pharmaceutical industry won't tell you this as there is no money in it for them a business is set up to economically rape a human being you are dealing with a business that is controlled by homicidal maniacs
also take proteolytic enzymes glutathione, Vitamin C, vitamin E works specifically on fat which is what your liver is made of Also Lugols 7% Iodine organic sulphur and boron all work on different parts of the body Cell salts are amazing for curing various things especially cancer
Don't give up and don't believe what your told do your own research on all of this as we are all responsible for ourselves
originally posted by: Pardon?
Can you provide the physiological process of how "lemon & lime clean the liver" please?
How do you get it to your liver and in exactly what dose do you need?
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: Pardon?
Can you provide the physiological process of how "lemon & lime clean the liver" please?
It's well known you can use citrus juice on liver.
How do you get it to your liver and in exactly what dose do you need?
It involves a shallow glass bowl. Two lemons.
Here are instructions...
originally posted by: jinni73
a reply to: Pardon?
you're saying I told them to not get a liver transplant I said you don't need one if you eat the right foods.
people are responsible for their own actions I tell people to research it as the pharmaceutical industry and the people that protect are nothing more than terrorists.
so the liver isn't made of phospholipids
it seems a bit funny that I risk my life to save people like you although and then I get smashed by people like you you are very ignorant and sometimes I wish that I had of let them do what they were going to do
I'm sure there are good people in the UK that would appreciate what I did for them unlike some.
Not in some way that karma or happiness or good thoughts affect them. Those sorts of vibrations are from Theosophy, originally, and they are the same as the empty set. They do not exist.
Happiness/goodness/karmatic vibrations cannot be measured, because they are not there.
Sadly, you have Madame Blavatsky to thank for using "vibration", "energy", "field" and so on in ways physics do not.
And that's it. There's not a "higher" or "lower" vibration in there. For a particular vibratory mode and molecule, it's a fixed frequency, which is why you can use it for spectroscopy.
They're not that recent. We can figure out what sort of material you have just by the vibrations. That's how IR and microwave spectroscopy work
Not that density varies with karma, either. Because karma's not real.
Take note of the first sentence you wrote "What you believe, has no bearing on what is true". It's reciprocal.
There have been only stories on ATS about the LipoC and as you know, being a scientist and all, anyone can write anything about anything. Showing real proof is the key and that hasn't been shown. When you say "there are tons of studies on how it kills viruses" any chance you could link to a few?
And as for the point that you don't accept other's definitions of proof, well that says it all doesn't it?
If something works it can be proven quite easily.
It's only difficult (or impossible) to prove if it doesn't.
So I can understand why you shy away of offering proof.
originally posted by: dominicus
We just discussed QM vibrations, but now you are going back to theosophy and saying they don't exist. Okay, whatever
We don't know this yet, because we don't have instruments to measure this yet. Lack of evidence isn't evidence of lack
I've personally experienced a bunch of vibrations from spiritual practices and grace from spiritual beings, inner channels opening, consciousness, etc. There is most definitely "energy" everywhere that a person can feel, especially those who are sensitive to it. Since science has been mostly biased towards materialism, this won't be proven for a while, and has to remain, for now, within the confines of direct experience and philosophical possibility.
Yes but light, sound, and other aspects of reality do have various frequencies that are higher or lower...
All you are telling me is what science knows right now, which is limited to what actually is.
There's that "vibrations" word you say don't exist, again.
And you know that karma isn't real how?
Do you remember your pre-existence prior to being born in a body?
...only the physical exists and that only this life here is all that there is, which means only science/logic/reason/analytics is correct, and nothing else. Sucks for you to have that view...
originally posted by: dominicus
a reply to: Pardon?
Take note of the first sentence you wrote "What you believe, has no bearing on what is true". It's reciprocal.
Exactly, it works both ways. Hence, I remember pre-existing prior to being born in a body and all the things that go on with that, which gives me a broader view, of the limits of science and living in a mental box as well. While you are probably stuck having to believe that what one aspect of reality says, science, is true. To even properly comprehend science and its limitation requires a deep understanding of philosophy, anthropology, and many more just for starters.
There have been only stories on ATS about the LipoC and as you know, being a scientist and all, anyone can write anything about anything. Showing real proof is the key and that hasn't been shown. When you say "there are tons of studies on how it kills viruses" any chance you could link to a few?
Then go invest your own time and google your own studies. I'm out here experiencing the benefits of Lipo C and colloidal silver, as are the people I introduce it to, as are the animals that get it, as are hundreds maybe thousands of testimonies.
And as for the point that you don't accept other's definitions of proof, well that says it all doesn't it?
Doctors/Nutritionist used to say we need to drink 12-16 glasses of water a day, then later it changed it to drink when you're thirsty. Science is not static, its dynamic, constantly finding new things that bring the old into new light, and its highly philosophical. Plus I remember pre-existing prior to being born, so I know spiritual realms are real and have a broad view of all of existence, and where we are lacking scientifically, is understanding what consciousness is, because all the time has been spent on external details, without blance to examine the internal. "Consciousness", and its study, was considered "taboo" 30 years ago, lol. Imagine that, academia had a bias against the very thing we use to exist and examine reality, how funny. What other bias is there in science, I wonder, and what effects does that have on what we know today.
Or suppose you read up on some anthropological studies that actually prove that people in the East have a variety of differences from people in the West, like spatial reasoning, the idea of self, differences in usage of logic and reason, and many Many others. So if Science was raised in the East, we would have an entire different set of understanding, and they would probably spend a large amount of focus on consciousness itself, as opposed to external reality. We'd probably know what it is by now.
So I don't accept "proof" such as lack of evidence, which is never evidence of lack. And whatever is factual now, is subject to change in the light of 1 new discovery that can possibly flip everything in on its head (such as the existence of consciousness outside of a body, existence being a simulation, or exploration into another universe/dimension which does not have the same laws of reality/nature/existence that we have). Its a more flexible dynamic view.
If something works it can be proven quite easily.
I've seen miracles, against all medical odds. How do I go about proving those? I've accessed spiritual enlightenment, and have shown others, successfully, how they can experience it too, how do I prove so scientifically, a direct experience, when science does not allow for subjective experiences because if its own inherent limits of making sure everything being limited to repeatability and objectivity, and yet not all things are repeatable or objective (like this present moment direct experience)
It's only difficult (or impossible) to prove if it doesn't.
So I can understand why you shy away of offering proof.
That's a joke!!! I have better things to do then try to bring about a revolution in thinking, when I can just show someone something so they can see it for themselves. Plus this thread is about my brother-in-law, who even as a skeptic, has started experiencing spiritual experiences that are going on with his healing. I have faith, against #ty odds, that he will recover fully and I will post the official results here as proof
Every single one of your responses is straight out of woo 101.
Dodge, dodge, denial, testimony, dodge.
I'll repeat again, if something works and is reproducible then it can easily be proven, subjective or not.
And please try to understand what proof actually is.
Proof is not a post on a thread on a conspiracy site. However much you want it to be.