It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Midnight13
Actually, men can be objectified too in a way. They can be seen as merely sperm doners!
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: Realtruth
Men’s Roles for Ages
Think about it for a moment, a man is geared to:
1) Hunt for food and gather
2) Provide a home/ Shelter and provide protection for his territory.
3) Insure his genes survive (ie: Procreation/Breeding)
Women’s Roles for Ages, what a women is geared to:
1) Preparing food
2) Taking care of a male’s territory (cleaning) and caring for offspring (children).
3) Being seen as the sex object to produce children to insure that genes were carried on
Why, when talking about procreation, the man's role is simply to "insure his genes survive" and the woman's is to be an object? Why isn't her role the EXACT same as the man's? To Insure HER genes survive?
It may interest you to know that in biblical history certain lines had to come through certain women. Now the male element was there but they were required, they Abraham, Judah, to procreate with certain specific women and these women also obtained part of the promise of the line.
Folks talk about "Abrahamic religions" ect and so forth. But the real story there is Abrahams wife Sarah, to her offspring were granted, by God none the less, certain things as opposed to Abrahams concubine Hagar.
Go down to Maya land to the famous temple at Palenque. Pascal and son Con Balaam, both moralized there. But why was his son so special? Because he was born "in the likeness of the first mother" (which is another deep topic) as it is recorded at the temple.
Anyway these joint line, male/female line unions, considerations were important.
originally posted by: Midnight13
Actually, men can be objectified too in a way. They can be seen as merely sperm doners!
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Bluesma
unconditionally loving someone can be a very dangerous thing. We all have to learn that at some point, I guess.
originally posted by: QueenofWeird
a reply to: Realtruth
I have an idea for you: view them as a person. To see any person as some sort of a worker, based or not on gender, is a real shame.