It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why can't it shoot the cannon at that height without stalling? What a load of BS right there.
Cannons: impossible. The Su-25 was at minimum 10,000 feet below the 777. This means simply pointing the cannon at the 777 without stalling would have been a challenge. The ballistic trajectory of the cannon fire would have made this worse. The Gsh-30-2 cannon fires a round which travels at only 2800 feet per second, significantly lower than, say, the round fired by a 338 Lapua sniper rifle. Imagine trying to shoot down an airplane with a rifle, from 2-3 miles away using your eyeball, in a plane, at a ballistic angle. If the MH17 was somehow taken out by cannon fire, it will have obvious 30mm holes in the fuselage. None have been spotted so far.
The plane can't even fly that high so how is that BS?
and it can't shoot it's cannon at that height without stalling if it even got to that altitude.
Add in the fact that the pilot would have to be so nose high that he'd be pushing a stall just to get the gun on target, when he fired the gun, the recoil forces, which for any 30mm are impressive, are going to push back on the plane, and cause a stall.
You are making stuff up.
Add in the fact that the pilot would have to be so nose high that he'd be pushing a stall just to get the gun on target, when he fired the gun, the recoil forces, which for any 30mm are impressive, are going to push back on the plane, and cause a stall.
The pilot would be on oxygen, gloved up, etc. They don't generally go anywhere near it though after testing, as there wouldn't really be a need to, since the Su-25 doesn't deploy long distances, like the A-10 or other ground attack aircraft.
I see you haven't been here long enough to know that the member your replying to is in a very elite class of members here when it comes to military aircraft and their capabilities.
But it's not, because it would be close to its Absolute Ceiling, if it could get that high. At that altitude it would have to be at maximum power just to hold altitude, and any disruption, such as firing its gun could cause a stall.
But he was talking about the plane firing its cannon at 10,000m altitude and thus horizontally, which is BS like I pointed out.
Stalls can be caused by real-life flying situations. If the engines quit or a sudden gust of wind hits, the airplane's forward speed decreases. The airflow over the wing decreases and the amount of lift drops