It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ScientiaFortisDefendit
Did the local middle school AV club produce this video? Cripes.
originally posted by: lovebeck
originally posted by: ScientiaFortisDefendit
Did the local middle school AV club produce this video? Cripes.
Ahh, that didn't take long, did it?
The fact that it's NOT a "pro" video production makes me believe this man even more.
Great find OP. S&F for you!
originally posted by: aynock
a reply to: OrionsGem
lenz's law does indeed have substance, but it is an electromagnetic phenomena - it has nothing to do with gravity
perhaps you should read the link
originally posted by: Goldcurrent
a reply to: Drunkenparrot
I doubt the man would risk credibility for a few measly bucks from YouTube. And you doubt he's who he claims to be? Did you even read the thread? He owns shares in Lockheed, has a lawsuit pending, and holds numerous patents. I'm sure he isn't hurting for a few clicks on youtube.
Now his intentions are suspect to me. I think an ax to grind. I actually believe he's holding more to his chest than he lets on..
originally posted by: Goldcurrent
a reply to: Drunkenparrot
I doubt the man would risk credibility for a few measly bucks from YouTube. And you doubt he's who he claims to be? Did you even read the thread? He owns shares in Lockheed, has a lawsuit pending, and holds numerous patents. I'm sure he isn't hurting for a few clicks on youtube.
Now his intentions are suspect to me. I think an ax to grind. I actually believe he's holding more to his chest than he lets on..
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Goldcurrent
OK yeah I misheard him on that.
I asked this before in the thread with no reply.
Can anyone zoom in on the picture folders to see what they say? Any type of govt nomenclature? I didn't notice any on the back of the photos which makes me wonder.
I have worked within the government before and they are pretty particular about cataloging and controlling such things as photos so if nomenclature can be seen then it would add to his stories veracity.
originally posted by: Drunkenparrot
originally posted by: Goldcurrent
a reply to: Drunkenparrot
I doubt the man would risk credibility for a few measly bucks from YouTube. And you doubt he's who he claims to be? Did you even read the thread? He owns shares in Lockheed, has a lawsuit pending, and holds numerous patents. I'm sure he isn't hurting for a few clicks on youtube.
Now his intentions are suspect to me. I think an ax to grind. I actually believe he's holding more to his chest than he lets on..
I seriously doubt he is the one loading the videos on YouTube but I digress, where did you get the idea I am questioning his credentials?
Regarding his intentions, my guess is he enjoys the attention the same as many other senior citizens who enjoy spinning tall tales.
originally posted by: OrionsGem
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Goldcurrent
OK yeah I misheard him on that.
I asked this before in the thread with no reply.
Can anyone zoom in on the picture folders to see what they say? Any type of govt nomenclature? I didn't notice any on the back of the photos which makes me wonder.
I have worked within the government before and they are pretty particular about cataloging and controlling such things as photos so if nomenclature can be seen then it would add to his stories veracity.
You would not see any govt markings if this was from his own personal stash. Could be a non descript manilla folder. Who knows how many folders those photos have lived in before finding a home in the current one?
OG
originally posted by: OrionsGem
originally posted by: Goldcurrent
a reply to: Drunkenparrot
I doubt the man would risk credibility for a few measly bucks from YouTube. And you doubt he's who he claims to be? Did you even read the thread? He owns shares in Lockheed, has a lawsuit pending, and holds numerous patents. I'm sure he isn't hurting for a few clicks on youtube.
Now his intentions are suspect to me. I think an ax to grind. I actually believe he's holding more to his chest than he lets on..
Why would he read the thread? He made up his mind before the page finished loading!
OG
originally posted by: Drunkenparrot
originally posted by: OrionsGem
originally posted by: Goldcurrent
a reply to: Drunkenparrot
I doubt the man would risk credibility for a few measly bucks from YouTube. And you doubt he's who he claims to be? Did you even read the thread? He owns shares in Lockheed, has a lawsuit pending, and holds numerous patents. I'm sure he isn't hurting for a few clicks on youtube.
Now his intentions are suspect to me. I think an ax to grind. I actually believe he's holding more to his chest than he lets on..
Why would he read the thread? He made up his mind before the page finished loading!
OG
Sigh...
Do you have any idea how many times a variation of this thread has been posted and discussed ad nauseam?
I actually read the thread to see if there was anything new, 16 pages later and no, nothing new.
You are also welcome for my taking the time to read your thread....
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: OrionsGem
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Goldcurrent
OK yeah I misheard him on that.
I asked this before in the thread with no reply.
Can anyone zoom in on the picture folders to see what they say? Any type of govt nomenclature? I didn't notice any on the back of the photos which makes me wonder.
I have worked within the government before and they are pretty particular about cataloging and controlling such things as photos so if nomenclature can be seen then it would add to his stories veracity.
You would not see any govt markings if this was from his own personal stash. Could be a non descript manilla folder. Who knows how many folders those photos have lived in before finding a home in the current one?
OG
That explanation doesn't add up in the slightest. Area 51 type of installation and scientists just walking out with a personal stash of photos. Nope that is a crazy thought.
I have worked with mild security and that wouldn't fly.
Second the photos would need to be developed and that would happen in house where they catalog them. Unless you are suggesting they were dropped of at the local 24hr developer which is even crazier.
As I said a govt nomenclature on them would add credibility the lack of nomenclature detracts.