It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nicorette
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: Nicorette
Imagine if you could fire 500 rounds a minute at mach 5. You could turn a mountain into Swiss cheese pretty quickly.
Yeah.
You can also power the energy grid without pollution, without ripping up more of Appalachia or the Canadian tar sands. You can shut down all the Chernobyls, Fukushimas, the Three Mile Islands -- Fusion is orders of magnitude safer and cleaner than Fission. You could keep stupid nationalist terrorist states North Korea, Saudi Arabia and all their guerrilla puppets off the grid and on the run.
originally posted by: mortex Sorry to laugh but LOL.
Lift the world out of poverty? ..how, is it going to feed 7 billion people, provide billions of jobs and pay packets for everyone, provide housing for everyone, clothes on peoples backs etc?
Solve numerous energy problems? ..and what makes you think that this technology is going to be economically viable for the majority of the planet, let alone available to every country on the planet?
Open the way to reasonable space travel? ..lol, is this like the nuclear powered space ships?
This post is as funny as the guy who thinks in ten years there will be nuclear fusion powered trucks.
You guys obviously don't understand just how much oil and gas the world really does have, just how many untapped resources remain. We've got hundreds of years left of the stuff. Not just gas and oil, but of all resources. The worlds biggest multi-mineral mine, Olympic Dam, can be mined continuously for several hundred years. Think about that in the context of things.
originally posted by: yorkshirelad
Just had a thought ....this technology would herald a new steam age !!!!
Even in a nuclear power station all that technology simply boils water to turn a steam turbine to generate electricity (although I'm sure some people think differently Star Trek style !!!!)
Now with a portable generator the only tried and tested way of converting "engine heat" to "work at the wheel" is via steam. Sure you could have a steam turbine and generate electricity but that would simply introducing inefficiencies. Why bother "turning" the steam turbine to make electricity to transmit to wheels to turn an electric motor when you could use the rotation of the steam turbine directly!!!!
So it seems an appropriate time to invest in steam engines ....time to go to Swindon or the York Railway Museum and dig out some of those archived plans.
You do have a point as all radiation is not fully understood as of present.
originally posted by: SLAYER69
a reply to: MystikMushroom
Stand too close it'd suck the iron right out of your blood.
originally posted by: Cauliflower
The lab worker with the flashlight checking the boiler sight port isn't wearing a watch?
None of them are.
originally posted by: Nicorette
WASHINGTON (Reuters): Lockheed Martin Corp said on Wednesday it had made a technological breakthrough in developing a power source based on nuclear fusion, and the first reactors, small enough to fit on the back of a truck, could be ready for use in a decade.
Tom McGuire, who heads the project, said he and a small team had been working on fusion energy at Lockheed's secretive Skunk Works for about four years, but were now going public to find potential partners in industry and government for their work.
Lockheed says makes breakthrough on Fusion Energy project
If this pans out, this could be HUGE news, a literal game changer for humanity. Nuclear fission is dirty, dangerous and cumbersome. Nuclear fusion could solve our numerous energy problems, lift the world out of poverty, and open the way to reasonable space travel.
This is not some crank with a free energy device. This is coming from Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works, reported by multiple credible mainstream media sources.
This Aviation Week exclusive goes into much, much greater technical detail and talks to the scientists.
Hidden away in the secret depths of the Skunk Works, a Lockheed Martin research team has been working quietly on a nuclear energy concept they believe has the potential to meet, if not eventually decrease, the world’s insatiable demand for power.
Thomas McGuire, principal investigator of the Skunk Works nuclear fusion experiment dubbed T4, with the project’s stainless steel containment vessel that is roughly the size of a business-jet engine.
At Lockheed Martin Skunk Works®, we’re making advancements in the development of fusion energy, the ultimate form of renewable power. Our scientists and engineers are looking at the biggest natural fusion reactor for inspiration – the sun. By containing the power of the sun in a small magnetic bottle, we are on the fast track to developing compact fusion reactors to serve the world’s ever-growing energy needs. Watch the video to discover more.
This is the best news I have heard in a long time.
What got missed by much of the initial coverage of this breakthrough is how extensive Lockheed Martin’s portfolio of renewable energy ventures has become. Senior management apparently decided some time ago that clean energy was the most attractive business development opportunity beyond its traditional military markets, so it now has over a dozen separate ventures in progress — often in partnership with other companies. Here is a sampling of what the company is doing energy-wise in addition to its fusion research.
1. Ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC). In partnership with Hong Kong-based Reignwood Group, the company is building the world’s largest OTEC plant off the coast of southern China. Lockheed envisions the 10 megawatt floating facility as the first in a series of plants scaling up to 100 megawatts that exploit the heat difference between ocean depths and the Sun-warmed sea surface to generate electricity; the same technology could potentially be utilized along the U.S. Gulf Coast and lower East Coast.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
Because the military, especially the Navy, wants it in a bad way. They could have a nuclear powered surface fleet finally.
A high-β spheromak reactor concept has been formulated with an estimated overnight capital cost that is competitive with conventional power sources. This reactor concept utilizes recently discovered imposed-dynamo current drive (IDCD) and a molten salt (FLiBe) blanket system for first wall cooling, neutron moderation and tritium breeding. Currently available materials and ITER-developed cryogenic pumping systems were implemented in this concept from the basis of technological feasibility. A tritium breeding ratio (TBR) of greater than 1.1 has been calculated using a Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP5) neutron transport simulation. High temperature superconducting tapes (YBCO) were used for the equilibrium coil set, substantially reducing the recirculating power fraction when compared to previous spheromak reactor studies. Using zirconium hydride for neutron shielding, a limiting equilibrium coil lifetime of at least thirty full-power years has been achieved. The primary FLiBe loop was coupled to a supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle due to attractive economics and high thermal efficiencies. With these advancements, an electrical output of 1000 MW from a thermal output of 2486 MW was achieved, yielding an overall plant efficiency of approximately 40%.
So do they have the material already and if so, where did it come from? (Alien tech is obvious, be original)
As an element in the U.S. Advanced Power Extraction (APEX) program, the solid first wall and blanket design team assessed innovative design configurations with the use of advanced nano-composite ferritic steel (AFS) as the structural material and FLiBe as the tritium breeder and coolant. The goal for the assessment is to search for designs that can have high volumetric power density and surface heat-flux handling capability, with assurance of fuel self-sufficiency, high thermal efficiency and passive safety for a tokamak power reactor. We selected the re-circulating flow configuration as our reference design. Based on the recommended material properties of AFS we found that the reference design can handle a maximum surface heat flux of 1 MW/m2, and a maximum neutron wall loading of 5.4 MW/m2, with a gross thermal efficiency of 47%, while meeting all the tritium breeding, structural design and passive safety requirements. This paper will cover the results of the following areas of assessment: material design properties, FW/blanket design configuration, materials compatibility, components fabrication, neutronics analysis, thermal-hydraulics analysis including MHD effects, structural analysis; molten salt and helium closed cycle power conversion system; and safety and waste disposal of the re-circulating coolant first wall and blanket design.
Development of computational materials modeling to enable rapid design and simulation of new and novel alloy materials with less repetitive testing. Computational design of materials has the potential to produce major breakthroughs
Development of superalloys and ferritic materials for use in AUSC conditions of 760°C and 350 bar pressure (5,000 pounds per square inch) to reduce costs, improve corrosion and erosion resistance, increase material strength, and reduce wall thickness.
Development of functional materials for energy storage and high-performance materials with mechanical properties that can perform reliably at temperatures well over 1,000ºC.
Development of advanced metallic and ceramic coatings, including nanomaterials, to provide thermal barrier protection for turbine blades, combustor components and tubing.
Validated computational models capable of simulating and predicting performance of materials in various types of transformational power plants, including pressurized oxy-combustion, pressurized gasification, and CO2 cycle plants.
Heirs to Rockefeller oil fortune divest from fossil fuels over climate change
The Guardian, Tuesday 23 September 2014 02.19 AEST
Peter O'Neill, head of the Rockefeller family and great-great-grandson of John D Rockefeller, along with Neva Rockefeller Goodwin (second from the right_, great-granddaughter of of John D. Rockefeller, and Stephen B Heintz, president of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
Peter O’Neill, head of the Rockefeller family and great-great-grandson of John D Rockefeller, along with Neva Rockefeller Goodwin (second from the right_, great-granddaughter of of John D. Rockefeller, and Stephen B Heintz, president of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Photograph: Brendan McDermid/Reuters
The heirs to the fabled Rockefeller oil fortune withdrew their funds from fossil fuel investments on Monday, lending a symbolic boost to a $50bn divestment campaign ahead of a United Nations summit on climate change.
The former vice-president, Al Gore, will present the divestment commitments to world leaders, making the case that investments in oil and coal have an uncertain future.
With Monday’s announcement, more than 800 global investors – including foundations such as the Rockefeller Brothers, religious groups, healthcare organisations, cities and universities – have pledged to withdraw a total of $50bn from fossil fuel investments over the next five years.
The Rockefeller Brothers Fund controls about $860m in assets, said Beth Dorsey, the chief executive of the Wallace Global Fund and the Divest-Invest movement, which has led the divestment campaign. About 7% are invested in fossil fuels.
originally posted by: yorkshirelad
Just had a thought ....this technology would herald a new steam age !!!!
Even in a nuclear power station all that technology simply boils water to turn a steam turbine to generate electricity (although I'm sure some people think differently Star Trek style !!!!)
Now with a portable generator the only tried and tested way of converting "engine heat" to "work at the wheel" is via steam. Sure you could have a steam turbine and generate electricity but that would simply introducing inefficiencies. Why bother "turning" the steam turbine to make electricity to transmit to wheels to turn an electric motor when you could use the rotation of the steam turbine directly!!!!
So it seems an appropriate time to invest in steam engines ....time to go to Swindon or the York Railway Museum and dig out some of those archived plans.
originally posted by: CommandoJoe
originally posted by: yorkshirelad
Just had a thought ....this technology would herald a new steam age !!!!
Even in a nuclear power station all that technology simply boils water to turn a steam turbine to generate electricity (although I'm sure some people think differently Star Trek style !!!!)
It sounds simple, but in actual application it isn't quite so simple...
Now with a portable generator the only tried and tested way of converting "engine heat" to "work at the wheel" is via steam. Sure you could have a steam turbine and generate electricity but that would simply introducing inefficiencies. Why bother "turning" the steam turbine to make electricity to transmit to wheels to turn an electric motor when you could use the rotation of the steam turbine directly!!!!
So it seems an appropriate time to invest in steam engines ....time to go to Swindon or the York Railway Museum and dig out some of those archived plans.
Steam turbines are most efficient at high RPMs, so in order to transmit that high RPM power to the wheels you need a big reduction gear to bring it down to usable speeds which will introduce inefficiencies as well - then there's throttle control/response to worry about. Depending on the sizes and power needed it might be feasible without too much weight. The reduction gears we use on US Navy ships/subs are massive... Now if you generate electricity, you can match the generator design to the turbine speed in order to maximize efficiency of both, but then you would need a battery, AC->DC conversion, so more weight and complexity. There are tradeoffs with both systems, but I think the most practical use would be in larger ships. Both methods need a water reservoir, condenser, pumps, etc which adds complexity and means regular maintenance, not something for the average commuter car and the like...
originally posted by: punkinworks10
There are rumours that one of the breakthroughs made might involve direct conversion of heat to electricity. If that is the case, it will change the way energy is generated and distributed.