It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
originally posted by: samkent
Are you one of those who think more and more people are waking up the events of 911?
You might want to check Google.
Google Trends
Also type in your favorite snake oil salesman Richard Gage.
I have been talking with people over the last 13 years about this subject. What I have nearly always found is that the greatest number of people just believe the Official story....
I have come to the conclusion that it is not because they lack the intelligence to see the evidence and understand it's meaning, it's because if they were to believe anything other than the official story, their neat and safe world view would come crashing down.
People want to feel wrapped in that blanket and the moment you attempt to take it away, they get defensive and hold on even tighter and in some cases aggressively so.
It doesn't really matter, there are enough of us that know the official story is a fairy tail to carry the baton through the many generations to come.
The only way to quash the truth, is to kill all those that know it... and there are far too many of us to be able to do that.
Korg.
Cognitive dissonance is a major factor in believing the official story!
originally posted by: Tedgoat
What do you make of this HOLE??
The 40ft 'pothole' that shows Ground Zero was once the site of an Ice Age glacier ... Proof that Manhattan was once buried underneath an Ice Age glacier has been uncovered at Ground Zero.
Crews excavating the site of the destroyed World Trade Centre this summer have uncovered a spectacular underground landscape carved into the bedrock by glaciers about 20,000 years ago.
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Tedgoat
Please show me exactly where someone conducted a metallurgical assessment that showed it was molten steel and not molten aluminum. Then, it brings us back to the statement that the structural steel did not have to melt, it just had to soften, which it does at a temp well within that of a jet fuel fire.
originally posted by: PLAYERONE01
come on man, you seriously think all of that molten metal that was dripping and pooling everywhere was aluminium from the jet/jets. that is what you are saying.
originally posted by: Tedgoat
a reply to: hellobruce
Is your glacier story related to this picture which apparently shows melted rock?
It is simply impossible for a hydrocarbon and office furnishings fire burning in air to melt steel, it just doesn't happen. Yet SOMETHING caused large quantities of molten iron and/or steel to accumulate in the basements of all three WTC buildings that collapsed to the ground and apparently some steel was even VAPORIZED that day.
The melted steel in the basements has been documented in videos and photos of glowing red and orange debris dripping molten metal as it is scooped out of pooled molten material below. In some cases this was MANY WEEKS after 9/11 and MANY WEEKS after constant soaking with firehoses, THIS WAS NOT JUST A JET FUEL AND OFFICE FURNISHINGS FIRE as supporters of the official conspiracy theory would like you to believe.
originally posted by: Tedgoat
a reply to: hellobruce
No proof of Molten Steel?
It is simply impossible for a hydrocarbon and office furnishings fire burning in air to melt steel.... apparently some steel was even VAPORIZED that day.