It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crazyewok
George Osborne proposes two year benefits freeze
All I can say is what a class A twat!
So MP can get a pass rise and they can afford to drop bombs on Iraq but they are going to cut money to the most needy?
What a tosser.
Hey if you want to save 3 Billion why not stop paying that £55 million day protection money to Brussels? Or stop playing world police and dropping bombs? Or hey why not cut back foreign aid! OR stop the war on drugs?
I hate politicians.
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
It may not be popular with the working classes but It is absolutely what is needed.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
It may not be popular with the working classes but It is absolutely what is needed.
No its not! There is a dozen things the UK could do to save money instead.
1) Cut the money sent to Brussels
2) Cut foreign aid. Half of which goes to country that abuse it or dont need it!
3) Freeze MP wages!
4) Stop wars in the ME!
# thatcher.
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
Good on Osborne. Too many idle people in the UK sitting on their arses. Why let folk have no encoragement to go and work for a living instead of sitting on their fat asses watching Jeremy Kyle. Hats off to him, must be feeling the heat from Farage
a reply to: crazyewok
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
Good on Osborne. Too many idle people in the UK sitting on their arses. Why let folk have no encoragement to go and work for a living instead of sitting on their fat asses watching Jeremy Kyle. Hats off to him, must be feeling the heat from Farage
a reply to: crazyewok
originally posted by: Quantum_Squirrel
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
Good on Osborne. Too many idle people in the UK sitting on their arses. Why let folk have no encoragement to go and work for a living instead of sitting on their fat asses watching Jeremy Kyle. Hats off to him, must be feeling the heat from Farage
a reply to: crazyewok
yeah because giving billions and billions away in foreign aid and dropping multi-million dollar missiles on pickup trucks are a much better use of public resources,
At least you can put your tax money to good use buying flowers for some poor child's grave in a third world country.
I am not unemployed nor do i receive benefits, but the conservatives always hit the poorest people first, its not the LACK of funds is the distribution that's all messed up.
Q
originally posted by: Quantum_Squirrel
ers for some poor child's grave in a third world country.
I am not unemployed nor do i receive benefits, but the conservatives always hit the poorest people first, its not the LACK of funds is the distribution that's all messed up.
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
It's better than the hundreds of millions lost following a terrorist attack on home soil... which would result in not dropping those bombs!
Korg.
originally posted by: crazyewok
George Osborne proposes two year benefits freeze
All I can say is what a class A twat!
So MP can get a pass rise and they can afford to drop bombs on Iraq but they are going to cut money to the most needy?
What a tosser.
Hey if you want to save 3 Billion why not stop paying that £55 million day protection money to Brussels? Or stop playing world police and dropping bombs? Or hey why not cut back foreign aid! OR stop the war on drugs?
I hate politicians.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Quantum_Squirrel
ers for some poor child's grave in a third world country.
I am not unemployed nor do i receive benefits, but the conservatives always hit the poorest people first, its not the LACK of funds is the distribution that's all messed up.
Exactly.
It the principle of the fact they are hitting the poor and vulnerable when there is a dozen other areas they could get savings in first.
If cutting safety nets was the only thing to do and there was no other option fine. But its not.
"We are all in this together" is total and utter bull crap. Only people suffering are those not in the top elite.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
It's better than the hundreds of millions lost following a terrorist attack on home soil... which would result in not dropping those bombs!
Korg.
Dropping those bombs MAKES terrorists!
Let the USA and the Arab states sort it out. It not like the UK can contrrbute much.
Look at Norway. They are not bombing everyone around the world and they are not having attacks happen.
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Quantum_Squirrel
ers for some poor child's grave in a third world country.
I am not unemployed nor do i receive benefits, but the conservatives always hit the poorest people first, its not the LACK of funds is the distribution that's all messed up.
with respect, Those that are in need of benefits such as the genuine disabled or the young family are alwasy looked after by the government. You should travel the world and see what it's like out there before you cry you are hard done by!!!
Anyone who is claiming job seekers for longer than 6 months is making a choice to be unemployed! Shy should I pay higher rates of tax to support such people and watch the country go down the drain?
You're wrong in so many ways it hurts my eyes when reading you're comment