It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: Jenisiz
I can't say if He Who Shall Not Be Named is part of some RK civilization or society or not. But I can say, this person did know a whole heck of a lot. Like he was able to know when and where I could see a very secret and exotic craft come through. He was able to describe details on it that I did not mention on any thread, as if he's seen it too. Even called it when he said that the next time I would see it, it would be more "Personal". When I did see it again, right when he said I would, instead of it flying off in the distance like the first time, it flew low and right over my apt. I mean right down the length of my street, perfectly.
This individual knew something. Whether the 25/75 rule came heavily into play doesn't discredit what he apparently knew and knew well.
besides. Zaphod's got some serious credibility, he knows a whole hell of a lot about aviation and aerospace. If he believes the individual had credibility as far as his knowledge of very compartmentalized projects that folks like Tom Clancy wouldn't be able to figure out, then he probably, most likely had some inside knowledge and was indeed credible as far as the more down to earth stuff goes. again the whole 25/75 rule can't be dismissed in anything this individual wrote.
And as far as proof. Just wait a while. I'm sure when the day it does debut, if they show what she can really do (unlikely) ATS's aviation forum will have a melt down. Take it from me. It's impressive and seeing is believing.
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: MystikMushroom
That's partly what I was trying to say.
They are "breakaways." There is a difference of opinions. The govts got some of the early "found " tech and extrapolated on it before the two were at whatever odds they are now.
So, it might be two nearly equal "sides" ...technologically speaking... philosophically, the two sides seem parsecs apart ... if true...
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: WanDash
And that 'blue wall' is obviously intriguing ... heh... I'm getting extra material paraphrased and emailed to me and one account briefly mentions that blue wall.
If I had to guess, I'd say that behind that blue wall is an infinity of more blue walls... OR a high school lab running a simulation.
originally posted by: Jukiodone
a reply to: Baddogma
That's where he had writers block ...any breakaway civilisation that can sneak around in triangles interfering with subconscious processes would have many ways to affect change in society.
This "hands off or we'll nuke the populous" defence as offered by the source is wonky whichever you look at it.
"World Leaders" need to sleep the same as everyone else so why not zap them?... or why not have us dream about the French Revolution and "1 %er's" every night...people would soon be thinking about guillotines rather than peaceful sit ins.
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: tetra50
Well, if true, those "cards" are likely largely responsible for the presidential aging syndrome that gets commented on... the tales of presidents boo-hooing over confidential briefings, etc.
The knowledge that all you thought you knew is basically a sham and the real endeavors going on are sci-fi channel worthy must be quite a shock... if true...
originally posted by: The GUT
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: MystikMushroom
That's partly what I was trying to say.
They are "breakaways." There is a difference of opinions. The govts got some of the early "found " tech and extrapolated on it before the two were at whatever odds they are now.
So, it might be two nearly equal "sides" ...technologically speaking... philosophically, the two sides seem parsecs apart ... if true...
But surely no human endeavors could match ALICE given what we've been told?