It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neformore
Most Dangerous man in Europe?
Hardly.
I used to listen to James Whale rip the crap out of this guy 20+ years ago - he wasn't even the most dangerous man on the James Whale radio show.
There are hardcore terrorists, psychopaths and killers who are running loose and are a damn site more dangerous.
Choudary is just a loudmouth idiot who has some very stupid ideas. Admittedly those ideas have no place in regular society but most dangerous man? No.
The most dangerous ones are the ones who go about their business quietly.
originally posted by: 8675309jenny
a reply to: neformore
What you and apparently GCHQ have failed to realize (until 2 weeks ago), is that his sort of venomous drivel actually turns the minds of youngsters who had a crap childhood, anger issues etc and who just want to be part of something.
originally posted by: neformore
originally posted by: 8675309jenny
a reply to: neformore
What you and apparently GCHQ have failed to realize (until 2 weeks ago), is that his sort of venomous drivel actually turns the minds of youngsters who had a crap childhood, anger issues etc and who just want to be part of something.
I think you'll find the British security services have a better knowledge/understanding/handling of the situation than a guy sitting in the US typing on an internet forum, but the next time I speak to any of them I''ll be sure to pass on your commnents
originally posted by: old_god
a reply to: 8675309jenny
Anjem Choudary is loathed by the majority of Muslims in the UK, this is a fact also stated by the BBC now.
But mark my words, he is a paid MI5/MI6 stooge and will be out parading around spreading his BS and creating more sensationalist media reports.
originally posted by: 8675309jenny
a reply to: Kandinsky
"most dangerous" was my thread title, not taken from any media source, but I stand by it, and I hardly think it's an exaggeration. This guy is responsible for Lee Rigby's death! A peacetime execution of a soldier in LONDON in broad daylight!
He is responsible for Jihadi John as well.
And personally I think the UK has put away the soft-touch PC pansy approach at this point, and is about to get Medieval on these bastards.
originally posted by: 8675309jenny
In my 20's I was much more idealistic in my politics and world view. I have come to realize that the pendulum swung MUCH too far in one direction in the short-lived sort of "golden era" bewteen post-war and around 1990.
It will be another few generations before the world sees such a period of overall easy life and prosperity for the west.
The gloves are off now, we have to go back to the hard justice that served our world quite well for millenia.
I don't want to see a martyr made, but Choudary needs a little accidental polonium210 or thallium injection.
Britain literally conquered the world (or very nearly) and yet in the last 30years we have let our culture, society, cities and people be utterly infiltrated, dominated, eviscerated and eventually subjugated.
THE SOFT TOUCH IS OVER.
People like Choudary want heads to roll??? Heads will indeed roll, but not the ones he'd hoped for. The sleeping dragon has begun to awaken.
originally posted by: JiggyPotamus
I mentioned in a couple of other threads that if Islam truly does teach violence towards non-Muslims, and people like those in the video are inspired by this doctrine to commit violence against others, then Islam should not be protected under laws guaranteeing freedom of religion. Any non-religious group who was inciting violence on such a scale, even on a small scale, would not be allowed to flourish, much less be offered the protection of the law. There is a difference in free speech and inciting violence, and this is not a small problem by any means.
I ought to educate myself on the teachings of Islam a bit more, because I have a hunch that it is a terrorist doctrine in that it teaches its adherents to be violent towards non-Muslims. And if that much is true, then the entire religion should be labelled for what it is, and none of its adherents should be allowed to openly practice it. Any doctrine that serves to squash the rights of other should not be tolerated, and the only hate groups that should be tolerated are the ones who do not incite violence. This goes for any group that incites violence by the way. I don't know how many people must engage in violent acts in the name of their doctrine for the entire group to be outlawed, but I say that these Islamic extremists have definitely crossed that line.
originally posted by: fishwhisperer
I actually like Choudary, why you ask ? Because although he is a scumbag and waste of oxygen he is educating a lot of non-Muslims on the Islamic scriptures who really have no idea about Islam and are happy to digest the bull that a lot of Imam's and the Muslim community are saying about how ISIS are not Islamic.
At least Choudary is coming out and telling the world how it really is, and what it means to be a Muslim.
Keep up the good work Choudary.
originally posted by: Flavian
But is he really that dangerous? To me he has always come across as the Katie Hopkins of the Islamic Fundamentalist world - a rent a gob if you like. Yes he has an opinion on everything but lets face it, if you were in a "sleeper cell" of some description, there is no way you would tell Choudary anything.
He has been monitored for that long that surely he would already be in an orange jumpsuit if he was actually dangerous?