It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: amazing
Again pot should be legal and readily available to those who are sick and need it. It's that simple. The side effect is dealing with more stoners. I don't know one pot head who's not the stereotype. They all claim not to be but they don't see themselves as others' do. Just remember..."Just because something is Legal, doesn't mean it's a good idea to do."
No it should be legal. Period. End of discussion. You have no business telling me or anyone else that we can't use marijuana (or any other drug for that matter) no matter what the reason.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: rickymouse
I would vote that it does have addictive properties for some people. Some people can get addicted to alcohol also, but most get addicted to the way of life that alcohol steers you to. That isn't really a true addiction though, you get used to going to bars and talking to people who are more sociable when they drink. It is a social adjuvant.
Marijuana is definitely addictive. It just isn't as addictive as alcohol.
originally posted by: Mianeye
When seeing these threads about cannabis i also see from the comments that those are the people who use cannabis, not all of them but i would say the majority.
Even though is not allowed to speak of personal use, there is many times a slight hint that the commenter is also a user.
These people have the knowledge and answers if cannabis is addicting or not, and how that addiction works both good and bad for them.
Unfortunately there are two problems in here, we can not speak about it, and most will probably not admit the addiction if they had the chance to speak about it.
My opinion is that it's addicting as much as the person want it to be, and the same goes for alcohol, if you can lay of or just enjoy once in a while, obviously you are not addicted, and the other way around is of course you are addicted, but it's a personal preference to do or not to do.
My advice is not to do as you can be addicted from various causes and being addicted is actually not fun at all.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
No it should be legal. Period. End of discussion. You have no business telling me or anyone else that we can't use marijuana (or any other drug for that matter) no matter what the reason.
The reason for the resurgence of heroin is in large part due to it being less expensive than its prescription counterparts, and US officials now warn that narcotic painkillers are a driving force in the rise of substance abuse and lethal overdoses. According to the US Justice Department, prescription opiates and heroin are two of the most lethal substances available.
articles.mercola.com...
originally posted by: OptimusCrime
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: amazing
Again pot should be legal and readily available to those who are sick and need it. It's that simple. The side effect is dealing with more stoners. I don't know one pot head who's not the stereotype. They all claim not to be but they don't see themselves as others' do. Just remember..."Just because something is Legal, doesn't mean it's a good idea to do."
No it should be legal. Period. End of discussion. You have no business telling me or anyone else that we can't use marijuana (or any other drug for that matter) no matter what the reason.
I gotta draw the line at that one. There are substances out there, yes natural ones too, that shouldn't be on a legal market. Weed isn't one of them.
Which ones? Hemlock? I am against any drug being illegal. Legalize and regulate, even the hardcore ones like heroin or coc aine. Prohibition is always a mistake.
Can I ask your plans for regulating every known drug? I'm really curious, no bs. I would like to know how this can be done.
Not to oversimplify things, but the Eighteenth Amendment (which established national prohibition) made a sizeable portion of the population criminals overnight. Even though the sale and manufacturing of alcohol was criminalized, the majority of the people who drank responsibly wanted to continue to do so. I'm not an economist but I learned that where there is a demand for something, a supply will be filled, whether it is legal or not. So Prohibition didn’t make alcohol disappear, it just allowed famous mobsters like Al Capone to step in and provide an elaborate, yet dangerous, underground market. See Boardwalk Empire more details.
Like I said, not to oversimplify it, but the mob thrived, crime soared, and gangsters killed anyone and everyone who got in their way. Tens of thousands of people died because of prohibition-related violence and drinking unregulated booze. The big experiment came to an end in 1933 when the Twenty-first Amendment was ratified by 36 of the 48 states. The Twenty-first Amendment was deemed so necessary (and the Eighteenth so ineffective), it is the only Constitutional amendment ever passed to overturn a previous amendment. Hence, Prohibition was a terrible mistake.
Fast forward to today – our society is swimming in drugs. We all have family members who use drugs, whether it’s Prozac or Ritalin or Viagra or painkillers or marijuana or coc aine, etc., and every other commercial on TV is trying to sell us a drug. Yet we still have a failed prohibitionist policy that is responsible for 1.5 million people getting arrested every year for drugs and tens of thousands of people dying because of a drug overdose – more than the number of people who die in car accidents. It's estimated that more than 100,000 people in Mexico have been killed or have gone missing since they militarized their war on drugs in 2006. And despite it all, millions of people around the world continue to use drugs every day.
It’s costing us way too much money trying to enforce prohibition. One of the main reasons Prohibition was repealed was because it was an unenforceable policy. Today, half of what we spend on law enforcement and the criminal justice system is for drug law enforcement. The U.S. has the highest incarceration rate in the world. And despite all these efforts, drugs are cheaper and purer than ever before. Instead of wasting money on incarceration and a bloated prison industrial complex, we should invest in treatment and rehabilitation, which costs far less than imprisonment and actually attempts to help people. We need to find the best policy that reduces the harms of drug use.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Time for a new update in the war against marijuana disinformation.
Is Marijuana More Addictive Than Alcohol?
So today we got this article that asks the question, "Is marijuana more addictive than alcohol?" Now anyone who is even remotely familiar with this plant should already know the answer to this question. It's almost insulting what some people will go to try to drag this plant back down into the depths of evilness. With that being said, let's begin the disinformation deconstruction.
But how much is too much? For this, you must know: Is marijuana less addictive than alcohol, the drug you plan to swap it for? Or will you end up like that guy in college who wore a Bob Marley beanie and whose desk was littered with “idea napkins”?
The answer to this and other questions surrounding the safety of marijuana is “we don’t know yet.” Pot has been illegal for decades, we have very little research on it, and the self-reported data of heavy smokers can be, shall we say, unreliable.
First, why is the author of the article even writing the article if she doesn't know the answer to the question in the title? Second, the statement above is incorrect. We actually have quite a bit of research on marijuana.
The lie that won’t die: “We don’t know enough about marijuana!”
Despite the US government’s nearly century-long prohibition of the plant, cannabis is nonetheless one of the most investigated therapeutically active substances in history. To date, there are over 20,000 published studies or reviews in the scientific literature referencing the cannabis plant and its cannabinoids, nearly half of which were published within the last five years according to a keyword search on PubMed Central, the US government repository for peer-reviewed scientific research. Over 1,450 peer-reviewed papers were published in 2013 alone. (By contrast, a keyword search of “hydrocodone,” a commonly prescribed painkiller, yields just over 600 total references in the entire body of available scientific literature.)
What information do these thousands of studies about cannabis provide us? For starters, they reveal that marijuana and its active constituents, known as cannabinoids, are relatively safe and effective therapeutic and/or recreational compounds. Unlike alcohol and most prescription or over-the-counter medications, cannabinoids are virtually nontoxic to health cells or organs, and they are incapable of causing the user to experience a fatal overdose. Unlike opiates or ethanol, cannabinoids are not classified as central nervous depressants and cannot cause respiratory failure. In fact, a 2008 meta-analysis published in the Journal of the Canadian Medical Association reported that cannabis-based drugs were associated with virtually no elevated incidences of serious adverse side-effects in over 30 years of investigative use.
So either the article author didn't do her due diligence or she is purposely hiding this information to create this imaginary conflict between alcohol and marijuana. What's even funnier is that she goes on to say this (and includes a graph):
Here’s what we do know: According to many studies, the lifetime risk of dependence—defined as a desire to use increasing amounts of a substance and suffering withdrawal symptoms if you don’t—is lower for marijuana than it is for most other drugs, including alcohol. Here's one data series that several prominent researchers point to:
Of all the people who smoke pot, in other words, about 9 percent will become dependent. But of all the people who drink, about 16 percent will become alcoholics.
So without even answering her own question, she posts information that literally says, "No, marijuana isn't more addictive than alcohol." Of course then we get this qualifying statement:
But this is all based on the studies that were conducted during the age of prohibition. Historically, people haven’t been able to get marijuana easily, which skews the addiction statistics.
She must be smoking the plant as well, because anyone with any sense knows that marijuana use has risen exponentially throughout its prohibition. It's not like since it is illegal, people aren't using it or anything. Though I can kind of see what she is getting at. She is referring to availability. With it being legal, it is easier to obtain than it being illegal. But I'm not sure how a percentage can increase because of the availability. If the population size increases the number of people addicted will go up, but the percentage should stay the same. This seems like a loose argument to try to incite doubt of the plant.
Before I go, I'll leave you guys with this nice website showing history of marijuana and hemp use throughout the ages:
10,000-year History of Marijuana use in the World
Don't believe the lie. Marijuana has PLENTY of research throughout history backing up its usefulness.
originally posted by: CardiffGiant
a reply to: CardiffGiant
im just googling and messing around
www.gfcto.com...
there are many paragraphs but they all boil down to this
When the use of marijuana is legalized (permitted) by the state, a Christian must evaluate using a different grid. Is the use of marijuana similar to the use of alcohol - a matter of conscience before the Lord and consideration before the church?
Therefore, since any use of marijuana robs the individual of their ability to control themselves at that moment and since long-term marijuana use physically harms the user, we believe that a Christian must never use marijuana.
3. The Possession or Marketing of Legalized Marijuana.
Therefore, we conclude that it would be sinful for a Christian to sell or otherwise distribute marijuana to others.
lifeteen.com...
There's a lot of research found today to show the physical, emotional and psychological damage marijuana can cause to your long term health, especially when used during your teenage years while you are growing and developing. Everything about it is bad news.
Using drugs is a sin because it is an act of self-destruction and thus an offense against the life that God has given us out of love. Every form of a person’s dependence on legal substances (alcohol, medication, tobacco) and even more so on illegal drugs is an exchange of freedom for slavery;
[B]Every time a person loses or forgets himself by becoming intoxicated, which can also include excessive eating and drinking, indulgence in sexual activity, or speeding with an automobile, he loses some of his human dignity and freedom and therefore sins against God.[/B]
-------------------------------------------
i know these are from well respected/sourced websites but that dont matter.
just trying to make a point and its this....
as long as millions and millions of people think(brainwashed) like this, things like legalization and decriminalization will have serious obstacles.
personally i dont care who worships what. i dont care how often they do it. if it makes them happy then i am all for it. i support their right to bow down.
we all know that a great many religious folk dont look at it like that. they are notorious for pushing their agenda on other people. they are notorious for wanting to police the public at large. they do it with many issues.
how often do 'they'(religious people at some level) get involved? we have all seen/read the arguments by them AGAINST homosexuality. we have all seen the arguments against a womans right to choose.
dont want to turn this into a religious debate. i simply wanted to put forth my opinion on another hurdle for the pro side of this debate. i make these points because religion has a loud voice in this country and there are a lot of voters who are religious. when legal/medical mj hits the ballet, a lot of 'them' vote.
i think the road to legalization is just now getting paved but we have a long while to go.
originally posted by: musicismagic
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: rickymouse
I would vote that it does have addictive properties for some people. Some people can get addicted to alcohol also, but most get addicted to the way of life that alcohol steers you to. That isn't really a true addiction though, you get used to going to bars and talking to people who are more sociable when they drink. It is a social adjuvant.
Marijuana is definitely addictive. It just isn't as addictive as alcohol.
This is so true and I'm glad you pointed it out. Alcohol can kill, and marijuana can kill you faster than alcohol. But now, what do we mean by kill. Most people are aware of the "social" kill that alcohol does and it is frighting destructive. Marijuana too has a "social" kill, but it too is a different animal. Let's face it, alcohol makes you drunk and sometimes very sick, and death can occur, marijuana makes you feel good, (that is except if you are stricken with sever mental problems, which most people users would agree, the buzz you get, is of being paranoid, and that is something everyone in the medical field agrees upon) but mentally unbalanced people have a lower "crime kill" thinking when under the influence of marijuana, but drunks, hey, "I'm go'na kill ya". That is the addictive behavioral pattern that separates the two.
originally posted by: Wiz4769
People need to be open and honest about pot before sweeping changes will even be considered. STOP the whole pot never hurt a fly and has zero negative attributes routine. This is coming from a pro legalization person, if you say it will not do this or that, and just one study or one "right" person finds out it just might, you have lost the whole argument. Start off with the whole truth and that will get results.
Alcohol is worse, most will agree any way you look at it or compare the 2. With anything there are minor things to consider, it does alter your mood, thinking and reflexes. Pot is NOT a big scary drug at all, but to say any person can just fire one up and still be able to carry on like nothing happened with the rest of their day is selling a lie. Thats the point Im trying to make.
Next, STOP trying to push an ALL drugs or nothing platform. This WILL, I repeat, WILL NEVER work in our lifetimes and will stall the headway that marijuana has gained. Work with weed for now, dont even put another drug in the same sentence, paragraph, etc. Separate them. Pot is a sometimes helpful , natural plant with some medical properties that can be useful. Stick with that and it will happen sooner than later.
Also , you guys are really going with the war on drugs is not working, so give up and just make it all legal, if you cant beat em join em. Why fight it...If domestic abuse becomes impossible to stop will you just join them and start smacking around your old lady? Why fight it?? Hard core drugs can NOT be made available to anyone, as bad as drug use is, the point that you have to know somebody, or travel to a seedy part of town to get what you need does keep the average joe from messing with that stuff. Not many school teachers know a crack or heroine dealer.
originally posted by: Taggart
originally posted by: musicismagic
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: rickymouse
I would vote that it does have addictive properties for some people. Some people can get addicted to alcohol also, but most get addicted to the way of life that alcohol steers you to. That isn't really a true addiction though, you get used to going to bars and talking to people who are more sociable when they drink. It is a social adjuvant.
Marijuana is definitely addictive. It just isn't as addictive as alcohol.
This is so true and I'm glad you pointed it out. Alcohol can kill, and marijuana can kill you faster than alcohol. But now, what do we mean by kill. Most people are aware of the "social" kill that alcohol does and it is frighting destructive. Marijuana too has a "social" kill, but it too is a different animal. Let's face it, alcohol makes you drunk and sometimes very sick, and death can occur, marijuana makes you feel good, (that is except if you are stricken with sever mental problems, which most people users would agree, the buzz you get, is of being paranoid, and that is something everyone in the medical field agrees upon) but mentally unbalanced people have a lower "crime kill" thinking when under the influence of marijuana, but drunks, hey, "I'm go'na kill ya". That is the addictive behavioral pattern that separates the two.
Completely false.
I'm not going to say anymore as it may break T&C's but as some one who knows about the subject I would NEVER say
the buzz you get is "just being paranoid".
There are different strains, different chemicals, different effects.
Paranoia is not the buzz.
When listening to music on it, you are not paranoid, you're happy.
Same for movies, I don't suddenly lose all inhibition and get paranoid that the walls are talking, that is signs of mental illness, if you suffer from that, STAY OFF IT and stop blaming the plant.
first time offender, casual user goes in. hiv infected addict comes out. yeah, good program what a joke