It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TechUnique
One could say that the maturation of the internet has really helped to open people's eyes to the truth. It still doesn't happen overnight, but change never does and it is ALWAYS resisted.
originally posted by: boncho
The first amendment should be changed.
You are free to speak, as soon as you disclose who you are speaking for. The media should have to follow this rule to the letter of the law under the penalty of imprisonment.
When someone is on any payroll, associated with any group, this kind of thing needs to be disclosed. It should go for politicians as well. Well, it should go for everyone, seriously, a rewrite on the first amendment that is in grave danger of being usurped. If you don't think it hasn't been already.
For the news agencies, it should be an unwritten rule that anyone speaking on air giving opinion pieces, should be countered by either an opposing group and at least 1 person at all times speaking on behalf of people. You know, those annoying creatures corporations enslave, always mucking about and causing problems for the bottom line whenever they open their mouth.
Hello, I am _____ speaking for myself. Those words should be like a war cry, to everyone in the room, "My words mean 100x more than yours so you better sit down, shut up and listen to what I have to say."
All the rest, under this law, you can imagine how people would perceive them if they stated, "Hellooooo, I'm _______ speaking on behalf of _______."
*eyebrows raise*
"Oh right.... what's that, it causes death, insanity, SIDS, gout, Aids? Cool, sorry... wasn't paying attention, are you done now?"
On topic: It's kinda hilarious that these guys are pushing to ban a plant, because they want to prescribe heroin and crystal meth analogues to you and your kids. Think about that, sane, rational people... think about that.
LEADING ANTI-MARIJUANA ACADEMICS ARE PAID BY PAINKILLER DRUG COMPANIES
As Americans continue to embrace pot—as medicine and for recreational use—opponents are turning to a set of academic researchers to claim that policymakers should avoid relaxing restrictions around marijuana. It's too dangerous, risky, and untested, they say
Overdose deaths from prescription painkillers have skyrocketed in the past decade. Every year, nearly 15,000 people die from overdoses involving these drugs—more than those who die from heroin and coc aine combined.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: jajaja
That's easier said than done. Many of the times the poor pill addicts got that way because of their doctor prescribing the pills to them during the recovery phase of some injury. Then they became addicted as their bodies built up a tolerance and the same dosage wasn't working anymore.
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: jajaja
Be your own doctor then, we have the internet, start googling
Yes because the internet can teach us how to fix something like a shattered femur with bones poking out of the skin.
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: jajaja
Be your own doctor then, we have the internet, start googling
Yes because the internet can teach us how to fix something like a shattered femur with bones poking out of the skin.
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: jajaja
Be your own doctor then, we have the internet, start googling
Yes because the internet can teach us how to fix something like a shattered femur with bones poking out of the skin.
originally posted by: jajaja
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: jajaja
That's easier said than done. Many of the times the poor pill addicts got that way because of their doctor prescribing the pills to them during the recovery phase of some injury. Then they became addicted as their bodies built up a tolerance and the same dosage wasn't working anymore.
Be your own doctor then, we have the internet, start googling.
Ignorance is no defence, perhaps it is just lazyness.
originally posted by: jajaja
Whatever shall you do when you have to fend for yourself when SHTF scenario? Isn't it wise to be at least more knowledgable?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: jajaja
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: jajaja
That's easier said than done. Many of the times the poor pill addicts got that way because of their doctor prescribing the pills to them during the recovery phase of some injury. Then they became addicted as their bodies built up a tolerance and the same dosage wasn't working anymore.
Be your own doctor then, we have the internet, start googling.
Ignorance is no defence, perhaps it is just lazyness.
You should never self-diagnose. There is a reason why doctors go through 8 years of schooling and tons of interning before they are full fledged doctors. Using things like WebMD to diagnose the weird growth on your leg is a bad idea. For one, if you are a hypochondriac then it will just make the inevitable REAL trip to the doctor's that much worse. However you CAN refuse to fill the prescription or demand the doctor fill out a different script if he prescribes with something you don't like, but I would never advocate self diagnoses. That is a recipe for disaster and can cause more harm than good.
originally posted by: jajaja
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: jajaja
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: jajaja
That's easier said than done. Many of the times the poor pill addicts got that way because of their doctor prescribing the pills to them during the recovery phase of some injury. Then they became addicted as their bodies built up a tolerance and the same dosage wasn't working anymore.
Be your own doctor then, we have the internet, start googling.
Ignorance is no defence, perhaps it is just lazyness.
You should never self-diagnose. There is a reason why doctors go through 8 years of schooling and tons of interning before they are full fledged doctors. Using things like WebMD to diagnose the weird growth on your leg is a bad idea. For one, if you are a hypochondriac then it will just make the inevitable REAL trip to the doctor's that much worse. However you CAN refuse to fill the prescription or demand the doctor fill out a different script if he prescribes with something you don't like, but I would never advocate self diagnoses. That is a recipe for disaster and can cause more harm than good.
Correct, you should sit in the doctors office and let him talk and talk and tel you what you need, sign every consent form without even knowing what he is talking about, ofcourse I use doctors, but they work for me, I don't work for them.
Where did I suggest to do this in any way? If a doctor gives you a form to look over, you should damn well read it. Signing things without reading them is idiocy and I NEVER suggested to do that.
Every time they suggest something; i say, ok I will read into it, but I never never ever ever make a decision that day. Only a complete idiot would do that and take their word as gospel. They make as many guesses many times as I can. They're not always right. When was the last time you took doctors medication? Me, long long time ago, I am still alive, and healthy and fit.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: jajaja
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: jajaja
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: jajaja
That's easier said than done. Many of the times the poor pill addicts got that way because of their doctor prescribing the pills to them during the recovery phase of some injury. Then they became addicted as their bodies built up a tolerance and the same dosage wasn't working anymore.
Be your own doctor then, we have the internet, start googling.
Ignorance is no defence, perhaps it is just lazyness.
You should never self-diagnose. There is a reason why doctors go through 8 years of schooling and tons of interning before they are full fledged doctors. Using things like WebMD to diagnose the weird growth on your leg is a bad idea. For one, if you are a hypochondriac then it will just make the inevitable REAL trip to the doctor's that much worse. However you CAN refuse to fill the prescription or demand the doctor fill out a different script if he prescribes with something you don't like, but I would never advocate self diagnoses. That is a recipe for disaster and can cause more harm than good.
Correct, you should sit in the doctors office and let him talk and talk and tel you what you need, sign every consent form without even knowing what he is talking about, ofcourse I use doctors, but they work for me, I don't work for them.
Where did I suggest to do this in any way? If a doctor gives you a form to look over, you should damn well read it. Signing things without reading them is idiocy and I NEVER suggested to do that.
Every time they suggest something; i say, ok I will read into it, but I never never ever ever make a decision that day. Only a complete idiot would do that and take their word as gospel. They make as many guesses many times as I can. They're not always right. When was the last time you took doctors medication? Me, long long time ago, I am still alive, and healthy and fit.
Last time I took a doctor's medication? When I developed an infection in my eye and the doc proscribed some eyedrop anti-biotics to clear it up. Glad he did, because they are fast acting and I was able to use my eye again fully within a day or two.
As far as doctors making guesses, you ARE correct there, but I'd wager that their guesses are better than any guess you could make. They have access to test results, your medical history, and their medical training. You have the internet and whatever you felt like looking up and informing yourself about (and you may or may not have source checked that information). I'd certainly trust a doctor's guess over your guess any day.
But why are we talking about doctors anyways? They are just doing their job. Sure they make mistakes and sometimes what they do is guesswork and others the best option they have available is to prescribe some pill being pushed by Big Pharma. But that is irrelevant. This thread is about leading academics being in the pocketbook of big pharma while touting an anti-legalization message.