Blacklight Power Sues Wiki Trolls

a reply to: hellobruce

Any machine can be made to appear to """"work"""" because an average person can't tell the difference between a prop and engineering.

originally posted by: Hanslune

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

Mills has working CIHT Cells

So how many units has he sold?

Can we know offically call him full of CIHT?

a reply to: mbkennel

Yeah I wonder if any of those machines were sold I'm they work don't they?

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

How do you explain the time lapse since 2008 and you may have missed my question.

How many of the items you say BLP has completed have been sold?

I don't know how many units have been sold, but I do know they've signed seven commercial licensing agreements with various power companies.

What I think they are doing is moving all of their product development into SunCells because this is a far more efficient method of energy extraction from the reactions generated.

If they have installed CIHT cells, they may replace that technology with SunCells in the near future.

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

As far as I can tell they have not sold a single one - perhaps to prevent anyone from seeing how they are fudging it.

So I think we can correct you - they have not completed a workable unit. They have said they completed a demonstration unit.

23 years and zilch. Remarkable.

Did you find that information on investing in BLP?

How do you explain the 2008 message?

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
I don't know how many units have been sold,

zero

but I do know they've signed seven commercial licensing agreements with various power companies.

so, nobody is putting any money where Mills' mouth is ?

NJ Civil Case Information Statement

A screenshot:



I have always felt that people have unjustly and with impunity tossed out that word "fraud" or "hoax" on this forum, which can be compared to Wikipedia - both provide a place for volunteers to post.

Assumptions that we all have about what is possible are driven by what we are exposed to so it behooves us to diligently pay attention to conflicting information, even if it makes us uncomfortable and confused.

a reply to: Mary Rose

Yeah, no one has sued BLP for fraud. BLP has never been accused of fraud by any of their investors. Any allegations of fraud are purely concocted by people who some kind of weird axe to grind.

Unsubstantiated allegations of fraud posted to a companies wiki profile is obviously damaging to their business. There is absolutely no reason to believe anyone has ever been defrauded by Blacklight.

Until some investor actually sues BLP for fraud, BLP should not have its reputation smeared on its Wiki page.

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
Yeah, no one has sued BLP for fraud.

You would never know that by the way members on forums throw out that word as if they know.

These are people representing themselves as savvy in science and technology.

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

Why are they only suing lowly wiki editors?

Why aren't they suing the myriad of scientists that have called it a fraud?

a reply to: AlphaHawk
Probably as he is not really going to sue anyone. It is a publicity stunt and everyone has heard of Wikipedia.

a reply to: AlphaHawk

Because it's nothing more than a bullying tactic to silence critics as part of a PR move.

BLP is an investment scam. Sue me.

originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: AlphaHawk

Because it's nothing more than a bullying tactic to silence critics as part of a PR move.

BLP is an investment scam. Sue me.

Like I said, go to Google's wiki page and accuse them of fraud without proof, then get into an edit war and have the page locked down so that your allegations of fraud are permanently stuck on their page.

Do you think Google's legal team would let that fly?

Give me a break.

ANY corporation would do exactly what Blacklight is doing.

What if you had a personal page and I edited it to accuse you of being a fraudster without proof and then had the page locked so you couldn't edit your own page?

Would you sue me?

a reply to: AlphaHawk

The crazy thing is, they actually have threatened to sue scientists before:

originally posted by: suicideeddie
just like blacklight tried to do in 2000. www.readcube.com...

... sent letters earlier this month to Nobel laureate Philip Anderson of Princeton University, Michio Kaku of the City University of New York, Paul Grant of the non-profit energy agency EPRI and Robert Park of the American Physical Society, requesting that they stop making defamatory comments in the press about the company and its president, Randell Mills.

I guess they now think, they will be more successfull by threatening some random guys on the internet.

ROFL

originally posted by: AlphaHawk
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

Why are they only suing lowly wiki editors?

Why aren't they suing the myriad of scientists that have called it a fraud?

You mean like this one?? The reason why they wont sue him is they have to prove him wrong and well i dont think the black light power team is up to that considering mills is a medical doctor.

Dr. Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist based at City University of New York, adds that "the only law that this business with Mills is proving is that a fool and his money are easily parted."

Kaku insists that such seemingly far-out visions direct us toward truths we can't yet see, whereas Mills, Kaku contends, is promoting something already shown to be impossible.

originally posted by: Hanslune
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

As far as I can tell they have not sold a single one - perhaps to prevent anyone from seeing how they are fudging it.

So I think we can correct you - they have not completed a workable unit. They have said they completed a demonstration unit.

23 years and zilch. Remarkable.

Did you find that information on investing in BLP?

How do you explain the 2008 message?

No answer AC?

Then shall we take that as your concession on the following points:

These are

In 23 years Blacklight has never produced a energy related product for sale, despite your previous claims.

In 2008 they said they were soon to deliver a product they didn't you are unable to explain this.

You have no idea what the requirements for investing in Blacklight are.

Dr. Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist based at City University of New York, adds that "the only law that this business with Mills is proving is that a fool and his money are easily parted.

YEP!

a reply to: moebius

We should do a Spartacus-esque campaign of calling BLP as frauds in solidarity with the a Wiki crew. If enough people call them out they can't sue us all

BLP is a FRAUDULENT operation. Sue me

Has anybody been sued yet? It's been well over a year.

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

I'm still waiting for you to admit wrong on claiming collapse by last summer. We had a deal. Maybe you will learn to temper your false intuitions with a hedge of wisdom.