It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Logarock
I have know many fair and loving christians that really love their kids and don't go in for screwing their kids up mentality. Even in the church most don't go for this approach negative but love their kids.
So have I.
I'm talking about the ones who DO "go in for screwing their kids up" mentally, even though that is decidedly NOT their intention.
How many times do I have to state that I am trying only to educate people on outcomes? If you raise a kid with violence, poor nutrition, self-loathing, and psychologically induced fear - you will be providing the world with yet another violent, unhealthy, hater.
Is that what you want?
I didn't think so.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: peter vlar
Let me ask, do you think religions that don't allow modern medicines to treat their children is child abuse?
originally posted by: beezzer
What are the solutions. . . . . . .
Indoctrinating the young ensures a new crop of believers to continue the work of controlling the masses. That's what religion was designed to do. As long as religion dictates government policy we will continue to have wars and division.
We can't make people raise their children any differently, but we can work to educate them. I wouldn't be opposed to the government offering (not requiring) to educate parents on what effects religious indoctrination has, but then it's up to the parents to choose what to do. Once they have an education, they can make a free and educated choice.
originally posted by: randyvs
I will never understand what drives people to ridicule,
what others share as an accepted way of explaining existence
and consciousness.
I'm sure you've ridiculed other people's beliefs, whether they be religious, political or personal. It's something we all do. You just called MM's beliefs "laughable, at best". That's ridiculing. Don't fall off that horse - it's a long drop.
. It's something we all do.
originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: MystikMushroom
I will never understand what drives people to ridicule,
what others share as an accepted way of explaining existence
and consciousness.
Because people are convinced that mankind
has a purpose, thru a superior being, realising the thought of us being
the ultimate big to do, in existence? Is really quite laughable at best.
And furthermore not bringing a better explanation to the table, or
even putting ones own belief on the table, to be ridiculed. As the
use of such labels as sky genie, do indicate you wish to engage in.
And all to tell us how you indoctrinate your own child, by filling her head with prejudice
against certain ideas. Because you've decided they're ignorant?
Way to go!
I found that to be...highly ironic. I can remember a time only a couple of years back where you frequently mocked and ridiculed myself and my beliefs Because they differed from your own.
Are we reading the same thread? I just went back and looked through the entire thing and there wasn't one mention by the poster in question related to them even having a child let alone how and what they teach said children. Even if that were the case, as long as those beliefs don't affect you personally, what difference does it actually make what someone else teaches their child? It's no more your business what morals and values I instill into my kids than it is my business how you impart your own upon your offspring.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
Yes, why would they do that??? Why would anyone harm, neglect, terrorize, or abuse a child? (Answer: FOR CONTROL, or because they don't know any better and it's how they were raised...or how else they might do things.).
"I begin with the young." ~ Adolf Hitler
"He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future." ~ Adolf Hitler
Was Hitler an Illuminati Agent?
originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: peter vlar
Oh really I fail to see the irony Peter. And as I said I don't
deny it. You can look back to those conversations yourself tho
and damn well see who drew first blood.
See I make a point not to
and really see no difficulty in not doing so initially. But I can rock
with worst of 'em. Which is reasonably why you remember so well.
And I was hoping most people know damn well that I refuse to hold a grudge
from one thread to the next. Come on Peter, I believe I also mentioned that
to you.
Then my reply must of caused an edit. Or I'm just a delusional schizoid, suffering
from an over dose of pharmaceutical hallucinogens required on fridays by the law
of the invisible supreme spaghetti monster.
And the rest of that ststement is just pure roll reversal pot n kettle crap. It's not
like you haven't seen remarks the same as that one incomplete reverse. But when
the shoe is on the other foot the crys for mercy go out before the shoe is tied.
You can do better Peter and should admit there isn't anything wrong in what I
wrote in that retort.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Logarock
I changed my post from "mythology" to religious Biblical interpretation.
Okay?
Can we still talk?
originally posted by: pirhanna
a reply to: BuzzyWigs
I was psychologically traumatized in more ways than I'd like to say here, in a fundamentalist apocolyptic cult / church growing up. I'm 38 today and have a very difficult time forming emotional bonds. I feel physically ill when walking into any kind of protestant church setting, as in barely controllable nausea. I don't plan anything long term, because deep subconsciously tomorrow will never get here, because the world is ending, every day in the deep recesses of my mind.
**** religion.