It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BobAthome
a reply to: 00nunya00
sure,,, if u have money to burn , i guess.
there are such things as BUDGETS,, and Accounting,,u know.
in the real world.
originally posted by: kruphix
originally posted by: DirtyD
a reply to: kruphix
While you make some good points, what the study shows is that there is no consensus, and there is still much to be learned about this disease.
As to whether or not the virus can be transmitted through droplets in the air (say an infected person coughs or sneezes), I'd say the jury's out. I certainly wouldn't be comfortable in an enclosed environment with an infected person. Would you?
Also, you keep falling back on the argument that the only thing that differentiates this outbreak from any other is the size and scope. I think what many are arguing here is that the size and scope is precisely the major concern. Nobody has studied the effects of Ebola on large populations. We are on uncharted ground here, so I wouldnt be so quick to poo-poo peoples' concerns and say past research is definitive.
The study shows only one thing, and that is what it set out to show...that Ebola can be airborn transmission between pigs and primates. That is all it shows, you can not logically extrapolate anything else from those results.
Again, size and scope doesn't change the virus. I know a lot of people are talking about mutations...but to this point it is all pure speculation with nothing to back it up with.
In the laboratory, infection through small-particle aerosols has been demonstrated in primates, and airborne spread among humans is strongly suspected, although it has not yet been conclusively demonstrated
originally posted by: BobAthome
a reply to: 00nunya00
im sorry but that would be up to your respective governments,,,
maybe homeland security might donate,,,
i doubt it though.
after all the ones who care for usa are on vacation.
originally posted by: 00nunya00
originally posted by: BobAthome
a reply to: 00nunya00
sure,,, if u have money to burn , i guess.
there are such things as BUDGETS,, and Accounting,,u know.
in the real world.
I would think all major airlines would be willing to donate tickets for this. They give donated miles to sick kids; there's usually at least one empty seat on any given flight. FEMA seems to have plenty of money to burn; why aren't they paying for the flights? I think most people would allow a $700 stretch in the budget to keep us all safe. Start a Kickstarter campaign, SOMETHING, if a guy can get $40k to make potato salad on fundraising sites, surely people will give a buck to keep possible ebola out of the same plane or truck their package from grandma is being carried in.
originally posted by: BobAthome
a reply to: DantesPeak
strictly speaking u are correct,,
how about "CONFIRMED AIRBORNE TRANSMISSION."?
originally posted by: violet
a reply to: 00nunya00
I've posted that as well, pages back someplace.
I'm of the opinion we, they really don't know enough about this virus yet. Anything is possible and shouldn't be ruled out
originally posted by: 00nunya00
originally posted by: BobAthome
a reply to: 00nunya00
im sorry but that would be up to your respective governments,,,
maybe homeland security might donate,,,
i doubt it though.
after all the ones who care for usa are on vacation.
Totally. But we're talking about literally a $700 plane ticket. To make 100% sure we "take all necessary precautions" like they keep insisting they're doing. Sorry, but trusting a frigging FedEx worker----no matter how experienced and high-up they are-----with possibly the fate of the future of the country is ludicrous. All to save $700. In New York, that means taking a cop off his stop-and-frisk beat for a few days. That's it. It's not some outlandish expense.
Now, Dr. Nyenswah said, officials have been beset with requests from dying patients and their relatives for the same treatment.
"This is something that has made our job most difficult," Dr. Nyenswah said. "The population here is asking: 'You said there was no cure for Ebola, but the Americans are curing it?'"
Liberian officials were set to meet Wednesday with the World Health Organization to see about getting the experimental drug rushed into use for other patients, said Dr. Nyenswah.
...
An Obama administration official said Tuesday that the treatment was arranged by Samaritan's Purse, a humanitarian organization that sponsored Dr. Brantly in Liberia. The National Institutes of Health provided Samaritan's Purse with contacts at the company developing this treatment, the official said.
"The NIH did not procure, transport, approve or administer the experimental treatments in Liberia," the official said.
A spokeswoman for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said the FDA can provide access to experimental treatments by a mechanism known as an emergency investigational new drug application, and that the agency's approval is required before an experimental drug can be given in the U.S.
There is also a doctor in Tennessee who recently returned from treating Ebola patients in West Africa. He has voluntarily quarantined himself, saying in a statement sent to the Tennessean that he feels fine but is acting “out of caution.” The Peace Corps isolated two volunteers who were exposed to someone who later died from the virus. Neither of the volunteers — both Americans — showed any symptoms, reported CBS News. The Peace Corps said last week that it would remove its volunteers from Liberia, Sierra Leone and Geinea due to the outbreak.
...
Also Tuesday, British Airways said it was suspending flights to Liberia and Sierra Leone this month due to the Ebola scare.
“There is no strategic plan of how we’re going to bring this under control,” Garrett said. “What will be the global strategy if this disease shows up elsewhere?”
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are sending 50 medical professionals to Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone in the next few days to relieve and assist people working on the crisis, Garrett said.
...
The World Bank on Monday pledged $200 million in emergency funding to help the West African nations contain the spread of infections and help their communities fight the deadly disease, which has historically reached fatality rates of 90%.
originally posted by: Destinyone
originally posted by: 00nunya00
originally posted by: BobAthome
a reply to: 00nunya00
im sorry but that would be up to your respective governments,,,
maybe homeland security might donate,,,
i doubt it though.
after all the ones who care for usa are on vacation.
Totally. But we're talking about literally a $700 plane ticket. To make 100% sure we "take all necessary precautions" like they keep insisting they're doing. Sorry, but trusting a frigging FedEx worker----no matter how experienced and high-up they are-----with possibly the fate of the future of the country is ludicrous. All to save $700. In New York, that means taking a cop off his stop-and-frisk beat for a few days. That's it. It's not some outlandish expense.
I'm tempted to go the the UPS and Fedex FB pages and post the story of how NY sent the ebola sample to CDC for testing.
Ask them if their drivers are aware they are transporting possibly LIVE EBOLA....see if that lights a fire under some butts to find a safer means for sending samples of ebola to CDC.
grrrrrrrrr......
Des