It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: adnanmuf
If the infected doctor was oriented he would definitely refuse transfer but then he was in custody as I heard so he could not reject.
“We thank God that they are alive and now have access to the best care in the world,” said Franklin Graham, president of Samaritan’s Purse. “We are extremely thankful for the help we have received from the State Department, the CDC, the National Institute of Health, WHO and, of course, Emory Hospital.”
A senior official within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration told Reuters the agency would consider proposals for providing treatments under special emergency new drug applications, if the benefits of the treatment outweighed the potential safety risks.
Batman made the decision and obi kanobi!
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
originally posted by: adnanmuf
If the infected doctor was oriented he would definitely refuse transfer but then he was in custody as I heard so he could not reject.
Which returns us to the question of who really made the decision to move him here.
The answer to this has not been clear.
We have them saying the Samartans Purse organization made the decision to fly them back, reportedly at the request of the two patients, and that they hired and paid for the transport, and with the "agreement" of Emory to receive them as patients. But we also appear to have military involvement or at least cooperation, as they landed on a military base. We have the Department of State saying, see the CDC, and the CDC saying not much.
If anyone can correct this summary or further fill in the blanks, please help.
Nature or God have nothing to do with it. How can nature bring the infected person across the Atlantic? Did Nature forced humans to live crowded and with airplanes
originally posted by: john452
If it's true we are on the verge of the 6th mass extinction event and high density human populations are a major cause would it really be so bad if this did spread? Do billions of humans deserve to exist more than a species existing at all? Like any organism I don't want to die and would do almost anything to stay alive but if nature has said enough is enough I couldn't disagree from objective point of view.
It's probably going to be our own stupidity and belief we are in control of forces that are beyond our comprehension that gets us in the end. It might happen now or in a hundred years when we blow our world up trying to harness the power of black holes or other forces beyond our control. Maybe a hard smack from nature is exactly what we need at this point in time before we do something completely irreversible.
airborne is less virulent (fast) than flu for example which is mainly non airborne method. When flu comes to town nobody can escape it. It hits what she wants with impunity. Cold and flu are the fastest epidemics on earth. Some theories out side the box theorize virus fly with heat radiation or come flatly from the space by means of falling.
originally posted by: paxnatus
a reply to: ~Lucidity
here is the difference Lucidity in air transmission transferred through the air and airborne....transferred through the air means with the presence of fluid forming a droplet... sneezing and spitting those drops in the air for example...airborne means the pathogen can be expelled by simply breathing into the air. making it transferable when you breathe the same air in a room as and infected person regardless if you have direct contact with the person or not..The virus particles then are too microscopic to see......
And that is the million dollar question or delima I don't think they know yet!
Pax