It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Slowjoe
I got a solution as natanyahohoho the rectum ruler is so deep in mr o's poop shoot that when he brush teeth natanjahohoho get his hair combed why do the world not RELOCATE israel to say agg duno new mexico or one of those other border spots with Mexico. Think of it then ob can let all the south americans in and those useless murdering motherf jew scum can target practice on them. Then both those 2 sic murdering sobs can have an orgy.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Vasa Croe
So you think the UN didn't actually know there were 20 rockets being housed at this school or that a second school had rockets as well? Kinda hard to overlook something like that I would think.
Did you overlook where your link says it handed over the missiles to local authorities? When means the rockets were no longer there so Israel had no reason to attack them. Like usual Israel had concentration of civilians they could kill and they went for it like they have done many times in the past.
No I didn't overlook it. My links go on to say that the local authorities are Hamas controlled. The UN should have had a bomb disposal team come out to dismantle and destroy, unless the local police are in the habit of keeping missiles for personal protection I guess......
Let me explain this in a way that you can understand it. When they say they handed over the rockets that means the rockets were removed from that area and moved to another area. Israel had no excuse to attack that area anymore because the rockets were no longer there. Understand now?
Let me explain in a way YOU can understand. They handed them over to HAMAS CONTROLLED LOCAL AUTHORITIES. Nobody said they were removed or even moved at all, and if they were then it is likely they were moved to another school close by as the reports say many of these schools are in very close proximity of each other. Understand now?
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: DarknStormy
That would probably kick off ww3.
Yeah, I bet you can't wait.
soulwaxer
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Vasa Croe
So you think the UN didn't actually know there were 20 rockets being housed at this school or that a second school had rockets as well? Kinda hard to overlook something like that I would think.
Did you overlook where your link says it handed over the missiles to local authorities? When means the rockets were no longer there so Israel had no reason to attack them. Like usual Israel had concentration of civilians they could kill and they went for it like they have done many times in the past.
No I didn't overlook it. My links go on to say that the local authorities are Hamas controlled. The UN should have had a bomb disposal team come out to dismantle and destroy, unless the local police are in the habit of keeping missiles for personal protection I guess......
Let me explain this in a way that you can understand it. When they say they handed over the rockets that means the rockets were removed from that area and moved to another area. Israel had no excuse to attack that area anymore because the rockets were no longer there. Understand now?
Let me explain in a way YOU can understand. They handed them over to HAMAS CONTROLLED LOCAL AUTHORITIES. Nobody said they were removed or even moved at all, and if they were then it is likely they were moved to another school close by as the reports say many of these schools are in very close proximity of each other. Understand now?
No. You make no sense at all.
soulwaxer
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Vasa Croe
So you think the UN didn't actually know there were 20 rockets being housed at this school or that a second school had rockets as well? Kinda hard to overlook something like that I would think.
Did you overlook where your link says it handed over the missiles to local authorities? When means the rockets were no longer there so Israel had no reason to attack them. Like usual Israel had concentration of civilians they could kill and they went for it like they have done many times in the past.
No I didn't overlook it. My links go on to say that the local authorities are Hamas controlled. The UN should have had a bomb disposal team come out to dismantle and destroy, unless the local police are in the habit of keeping missiles for personal protection I guess......
Let me explain this in a way that you can understand it. When they say they handed over the rockets that means the rockets were removed from that area and moved to another area. Israel had no excuse to attack that area anymore because the rockets were no longer there. Understand now?
I'm sure he understands it crystal clear. The only problem is there is no conscience in the way to make it stick.
soulwaxer
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: daaskapital
What's worse?
Storing missiles in hospitals/mosques, schools?
Or
Bombing mosques, schools, hospitals because there are missiles stored there?
Obviously the 2nd is worse. Why? Because people die!
Storing missiles -wherever- does not kill anyone.
You need to brush up on your moral skills.
soulwaxer
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Vasa Croe
So you think the UN didn't actually know there were 20 rockets being housed at this school or that a second school had rockets as well? Kinda hard to overlook something like that I would think.
Did you overlook where your link says it handed over the missiles to local authorities? When means the rockets were no longer there so Israel had no reason to attack them. Like usual Israel had concentration of civilians they could kill and they went for it like they have done many times in the past.
No I didn't overlook it. My links go on to say that the local authorities are Hamas controlled. The UN should have had a bomb disposal team come out to dismantle and destroy, unless the local police are in the habit of keeping missiles for personal protection I guess......
Let me explain this in a way that you can understand it. When they say they handed over the rockets that means the rockets were removed from that area and moved to another area. Israel had no excuse to attack that area anymore because the rockets were no longer there. Understand now?
Let me explain in a way YOU can understand. They handed them over to HAMAS CONTROLLED LOCAL AUTHORITIES. Nobody said they were removed or even moved at all, and if they were then it is likely they were moved to another school close by as the reports say many of these schools are in very close proximity of each other. Understand now?
No. You make no sense at all.
soulwaxer
Really? How so? Please explain as all you seem to be giving here are one liners with no content.
I have given plenty of evidence to the point I am making.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: daaskapital
What's worse?
Storing missiles in hospitals/mosques, schools?
Or
Bombing mosques, schools, hospitals because there are missiles stored there?
Obviously the 2nd is worse. Why? Because people die!
Storing missiles -wherever- does not kill anyone.
You need to brush up on your moral skills.
soulwaxer
Using children as a shield in war is morally repugnant.
Unless you're rooting for them, I suppose.
originally posted by: switchqm8
I am really sick of hearing about schools hospitals ect getting destroyed because they say they are hiding weapons there..Was any proof given to support their claims i did not read all 7 pages. Again i ask if the Israel military is so great why not send in teams ie seal like to deal with the real rebels. it is like sending a warship to take out a pontoon boat.talk about overkill and dont they get it they are just creating more hate against them with every woman and child slaughtered..but all governments need to bogymen/terrorists to justify the wars and keep that foreign aid a rolling in sick and disgusted. For the record i do not support hamas either. Is hamas cilivans or do they have a military also?
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Vasa Croe
So you think the UN didn't actually know there were 20 rockets being housed at this school or that a second school had rockets as well? Kinda hard to overlook something like that I would think.
Did you overlook where your link says it handed over the missiles to local authorities? When means the rockets were no longer there so Israel had no reason to attack them. Like usual Israel had concentration of civilians they could kill and they went for it like they have done many times in the past.
No I didn't overlook it. My links go on to say that the local authorities are Hamas controlled. The UN should have had a bomb disposal team come out to dismantle and destroy, unless the local police are in the habit of keeping missiles for personal protection I guess......
Let me explain this in a way that you can understand it. When they say they handed over the rockets that means the rockets were removed from that area and moved to another area. Israel had no excuse to attack that area anymore because the rockets were no longer there. Understand now?
Let me explain in a way YOU can understand. They handed them over to HAMAS CONTROLLED LOCAL AUTHORITIES. Nobody said they were removed or even moved at all, and if they were then it is likely they were moved to another school close by as the reports say many of these schools are in very close proximity of each other. Understand now?
No. You make no sense at all.
soulwaxer
Really? How so? Please explain as all you seem to be giving here are one liners with no content.
I have given plenty of evidence to the point I am making.
It only takes one line to out your kind. No need to waste my time.
soulwaxer
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: daaskapital
What's worse?
Storing missiles in hospitals/mosques, schools?
Or
Bombing mosques, schools, hospitals because there are missiles stored there?
Obviously the 2nd is worse. Why? Because people die!
Storing missiles -wherever- does not kill anyone.
You need to brush up on your moral skills.
soulwaxer
Using children as a shield in war is morally repugnant.
Unless you're rooting for them, I suppose.
You are missing something. Wherever Israel bombs, that's where the shield is.
soulwaxer
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: buster2010
But Hamas is forcing Israel's hand, keep kicking an animal eventually you are going to be attacked.
Who's getting kicked?
The Palestinians are in an open air prison, with limited access to resources, and once every few years their homes are bulldozed or blown to pieces. Meanwhile, the Israelis cry like babies because once in a while they get some scratches on their pavement.
soulwaxer
The reason that the Palestinians have limited resources is because Hamas.
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: soulwaxer
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: daaskapital
What's worse?
Storing missiles in hospitals/mosques, schools?
Or
Bombing mosques, schools, hospitals because there are missiles stored there?
Obviously the 2nd is worse. Why? Because people die!
Storing missiles -wherever- does not kill anyone.
You need to brush up on your moral skills.
soulwaxer
Using children as a shield in war is morally repugnant.
Unless you're rooting for them, I suppose.
You are missing something. Wherever Israel bombs, that's where the shield is.
soulwaxer
originally posted by: Snarl
I wonder if the casualties were caused by the Israelis ... or secondary explosions of Hamas' rockets.