It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
majesticgent
This will not go nuclear, but it could lead to the rebirth of the Cold War and another arms race. The proof is in the pudding.
Ukraine's leadership already stated they regret giving up the nukes because of the situation that they are in now. Hint hint: they will start developing them. Russia will not let that happen, plus they don't recognize Ukraine's new leaders or government as being official which is why we are seeing events unfold as they are now.
Four Baltic countries have formed a military pact. The US is sending assets to those countries. NATO probably will send more.
Russia is going to form ties with Latin American countries and I wouldn't be at all surprised to see Russian bases spring up in South America.
100 billion dollars of US treasuries was sold today. Who did it? People speculate Russia did in order to limit the effectiveness of threatened sanctions after the referendum on Sunday.
China warns the West about sanctioning Russia, saying it could spiral out of control.
It will be a stalemate; Who knows maybe even eventually resulting in two new countries; East and West Ukraine. History will be repeating itself all over again. Cold War II is possible.
The first one didn't go nuclear, and I doubt the second one will if it happens.
jhn7537
Just because there are giant arsenals of nuclear weapon stockpiles in the US and Russia doesn't mean they're going to use them all on one another if a conflict (actual fighting, our troops vs theirs) breaks out.. Yes, a lot of the military & govt. heads are a little loony at times, but they aren't going to stubbornly drop nukes on one another for the sake of just winning a war, while turning the planet inhabitable... Even if a nuke was ever dropped by either side on the other, I'm sure there wouldn't be that many more to follow. I've read posts on here suggesting it would only take 100 or 1000 nukes to destroy the planet (can't remember the exact figure, it was one of the two, but you get the point), I'm sure we would never see anything even remotely close to that, even in the worst of times of war. Ultimately, the people who drive war for profits still need a planet to live on and they won't want to kill the one resource we can't replace...
dragonridr
as much as you like to believe not everythings about money.
Foxtrot7x
Exactly . they won't just start with nukes lol . The situation gets dangerous when one side is about to lose ( russia here if its an all out war ) . Then will putin really care abt the planet ? Ideals , its the kgb thing. But again its all theoretical , might happen might not. Lots of variables will come into play
maddy21
dragonridr
maddy21
DJW001
This is it. If the people of Crimea return blank ballots, it means that Crimea still considers itself part of Ukraine. If that happens, NATO will be justified in sinking the Russian Black Sea Fleet at harbor. Good luck cleaning that mess up.
Justified ? when was the last time NATO needed Justification to massacre,Rape ,pillage and loot . They do it anyway just because they can . Don't think NATO needs justification for anything . There hasn't been a single Death in Crimea while same cannot be said about US allies themselves , killing Pakistani soldiers,bombing Afgan soldiers , bombing Marriage convoys and not to mention getting away with pretty much anything...edit on 14-3-2014 by maddy21 because: (no reason given)
If that were true Russia's military would be destroyed by now and Russia would have already launched their ICBMs as their final goodbye.Luckily they arent like you claim but keep trying as they say maybe theres other stuff we can blame on them before this is over.
Wet dreams, nothing more ....you have not been able to fight against ragtag 3rd world militia what makes you think you can take out Russia ? They aren't whom i claim ? Libya ? Iraq ? Kosovo or how about the fact that U.S has been at war with someone or the other for more than 90% of its existing life ? Might want to look at how many people have been killed in this war on terror ?Supporting religious extremists in Syria ? NATO bravado goes when it comes to defeating 3rd world nations, the whole thing crumbles when facing a military power like Russia .
majesticgent
dragonridr
as much as you like to believe not everythings about money.
You're right it's not all about money, but the love of money, resources and power that they can bring.
Why they may sound idealistic, the stopping of Neo-Fascism, is almost up there as the US going into Iraq to stop weapons of mass destruction from reaching terrorists.
If you notice, the West is threatening sanctions, trying to hit Russia where it hurts. In return 100 billion dollars of US treasury is sold.
Russia has a ton of natural resources and that's why they are strengthening ties with Latin America. To sell to them.
Weapons sales may have dried up for them, sure, but if they feel NATO is a threat to them and is in their backyard (Ukraine) I bet they will shift focus to increasing the quality of their arms, military, and defense.
Russian army moving towards the Ukrainian border
Informs the director of the Center for Political Studies Military D. TIMCHUK referring to the group "Media Resistance." "The airfield" Dolotinka "(On the other side of the border from Lugansk) transferred 40 Mi-8 and Mi-24" - he wrote on his page on Facebook . According to him, the village Derkul (village in Tarasivska near Rostov region in Russia) also observed the movement of Russian troops towards the state border. "Also, there is a cluster of troops in the area of Taganrog, Matveev Kurgan (settlement in the Rostov region) and Novoshakhtinsk (Rostov region). Near Novoshakhtinsk marked activity stations to intercept communications," - said Timchuk.
asen_y2k
Just woke up to the news of 2 dead and 5 wounded after a shootout between pro and anti Russians in eastern city of Kharkiv, along with more Russian troops ammasing on the eastern border and inside Crimea.
asen_y2k
Just woke up to the news of 2 dead and 5 wounded after a shootout between pro and anti Russians in eastern city of Kharkiv, along with more Russian troops ammasing on the eastern border and inside Crimea.
Two dead in clashes in eastern Ukraine: police Two people were killed in clashes that broke out between pro-Moscow and pro-Kiev supporters in Ukraine's Russian-speaking city of Kharkiv, police said on Saturday, the second such deadly incident in as many days in the country's tinderbox east.
One pro-Russia protester and a passerby were killed when Ukrainian nationalists opened fire on a group of men trying to storm their headquarters in the city late on Friday, police sources told AFP. The deaths were likely to further fuel tensions in the region, coming less than a day after Russia warned that it reserved the right to protect compatriots in the whole of Ukraine. [AFP]
Wookiep
asen_y2k
Just woke up to the news of 2 dead and 5 wounded after a shootout between pro and anti Russians in eastern city of Kharkiv, along with more Russian troops ammasing on the eastern border and inside Crimea.
Just saw this on Aljazeera live blog. I hope this doesn't give Putin his excuse to roll into eastern Ukraine.
Two dead in clashes in eastern Ukraine: police Two people were killed in clashes that broke out between pro-Moscow and pro-Kiev supporters in Ukraine's Russian-speaking city of Kharkiv, police said on Saturday, the second such deadly incident in as many days in the country's tinderbox east.
One pro-Russia protester and a passerby were killed when Ukrainian nationalists opened fire on a group of men trying to storm their headquarters in the city late on Friday, police sources told AFP. The deaths were likely to further fuel tensions in the region, coming less than a day after Russia warned that it reserved the right to protect compatriots in the whole of Ukraine. [AFP]
Aljazeeraedit on 15-3-2014 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)edit on 15-3-2014 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)
asen_y2k
Wookiep
asen_y2k
Just woke up to the news of 2 dead and 5 wounded after a shootout between pro and anti Russians in eastern city of Kharkiv, along with more Russian troops ammasing on the eastern border and inside Crimea.
Just saw this on Aljazeera live blog. I hope this doesn't give Putin his excuse to roll into eastern Ukraine.
Two dead in clashes in eastern Ukraine: police Two people were killed in clashes that broke out between pro-Moscow and pro-Kiev supporters in Ukraine's Russian-speaking city of Kharkiv, police said on Saturday, the second such deadly incident in as many days in the country's tinderbox east.
One pro-Russia protester and a passerby were killed when Ukrainian nationalists opened fire on a group of men trying to storm their headquarters in the city late on Friday, police sources told AFP. The deaths were likely to further fuel tensions in the region, coming less than a day after Russia warned that it reserved the right to protect compatriots in the whole of Ukraine. [AFP]
Aljazeeraedit on 15-3-2014 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)edit on 15-3-2014 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)
Especially the ones killed over night were pro Russians, who were killed by the radical Right sector.edit on 15/3/14 by asen_y2k because: (no reason given)
Wookiep
reply to post by asen_y2k
Agreed. I think Putin might be looking for any excuse to invade eastern Ukraine, these reasons would include "provocations" against pro-Russian supporters. There have been many reports of more Russian military forces massing on the borders, have you heard anything new on that or anything to validate those claims where you're at? I have heard Russia is saying it's not true, while sources like CNN were saying it all day.edit on 15-3-2014 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)