It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GrantedBail
reply to post by muzzleflash
Quit lying. The court never said anything. Your loverboy's attorneys concocted a scenario. It was never proven. You are ignorant to suggest any of that was proven. Your boyfriend's alibi was what raised "reasonable doubt". Wait and see what the jury has to say. They will not be praising the man you adore with all of your heart. They will tell you that there was "reasonable doubt", period.
Originally posted by GrantedBail
reply to post by muzzleflash
Quit lying. The court never said anything. Your loverboy's attorneys concocted a scenario. It was never proven. You are ignorant to suggest any of that was proven. Your boyfriend's alibi was what raised "reasonable doubt". Wait and see what the jury has to say. They will not be praising the man you adore with all of your heart. They will tell you that there was "reasonable doubt", period.
Originally posted by GrantedBail
reply to post by LeaderOfProgress
What physical evidence??? I am going to keep this focused. What is this physical evidence you speak of?????????
Originally posted by LeaderOfProgress
Originally posted by GrantedBail
reply to post by LeaderOfProgress
What physical evidence??? I am going to keep this focused. What is this physical evidence you speak of?????????
I know for a fact that have have given that in this thread within the last few pages. READ THE TRANSCRIPTS, WATCH THE VIDEOS. Fact is fact and though one can ignore it, doing as such will not make fact no longer fact.
Originally posted by GrantedBail
reply to post by muzzleflash
Well, I appreciate your thinking.
However, there is nothing in the Constitution regarding self defense.
We do however have the right to bear arms. That is enshrined in the second amendment.
I am not saying there should not be laws that allow a self-defense, defense. I am ok with that.
I do not, I repeat do not, think it is OK to instigate a confrontation and then claim self-defense. That law needs to be revisited and revised.
The right of self-defense (according to U.S. law) (also called, when it applies to the defense of another, alter ego defense, defense of others, defense of a third person) is the right for civilians acting on their own behalf to engage in a level of violence, called reasonable force or defensive force, for the sake of defending one's own life or the lives of others, including, in certain circumstances, the use of deadly force.
In most jurisdictions, defense of self or of others is an affirmative defense to criminal charges for an act of violence. It acts to provide complete justification.
"Justification does not make a criminal use of force lawful; if the use of force is justified, it cannot be criminal at all." [2]
Originally posted by GrantedBail
reply to post by LeaderOfProgress
Are you speaking of witness testimony to who was on top?? How, tell me how that tells you who was the one that confronted the other.
There is NO evidence to that. Only the words of Zimmerman. Who has been proven to be less than honest.
So don't go lying about all this proven evidence that Trayvon was the one who attacked Zimmerman.
There is no evidence.
There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was on top. I will submit to that. That doesn't mean he started the fight, it only means Zimmerman is a huge pussy and couldn't even handle a teenager without his firearm.
Yeah, fly the Zimmerman flag. He is embarrassing. What a punk.edit on 15-7-2013 by GrantedBail because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GrantedBail
There is no evidence.
Originally posted by GrantedBail
reply to post by muzzleflash
You attempted to attribute self defense laws to our Constitution. I schooled you on that.
Everyone is aware of self-defense as an alibi for messing someone up or actually killing them. That is legislation that has been taken up by the states, each one having different parameters.
You said it was a right in the Constitution. Again, you get caught posting inaccuracies.