It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And 90 percent of those chemicals can be run through an engine without causing permanent damage to said such engines, as they are a part of maintaining engines.
I think the people doing it would be ignorant to the fact.
To prove to us that there is nothing added to the fuel that is harmful to humans, is show us pumping or fuel trucks that have no hazard warning decals on them.
Originally posted by lonegurkha
reply to post by flyswatter
You seem to be trying to pick a fight here. You fail to acknowledge that I said in my first post that I don't necessarily believe in Chemtrails. All I have said is that it is possible.
The fuel comes from a refinery. A refinery processes crude oil into other things. Including many types of chemicals. Why would they need any other source for chemicals. They are already processed at the refinery. That's the purpose of a refinery. The fuel comes directly from storage tanks at the refinery. Anything could be added to the fuel right in the tank. The lines come from all over the plant to the tanks. It would be quite simple to put something into the fuel and no one would ever know.
Ok lesson over. Next time learn about what you're talking about before you spout off. A small amount of learning can go a long way. As I said in my first post I worked with chemicals for years,20 to be exact. In a plant which manufactured chemicals. I was an operator,that means I made the chemicals. Many of the chemicals I used every day came to us directly from a refinery.edit on 9/28/2012 by lonegurkha because: to add
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Rudy2shoes
To prove to us that there is nothing added to the fuel that is harmful to humans, is show us pumping or fuel trucks that have no hazard warning decals on them.
Well let us go one step farther and ask how come cars don't have these decals as gasoline is also harmful and is much closer to the population compared to airplane jet exaust.
In fact how about you show us gasoline tankers without those same hazard warning decals?
Not one person has ever said that jet fuel is not hazardous, what has been said is that the chemicals chemtrail believers claim is in jet fuel is not, and has yet to be shown it is.
Originally posted by lonegurkha
reply to post by waynos
You guys aren't getting it. It can be produced with whatever they may add and would be tested and pass. if the fuel were knowingly produced with whatever chemical that may be added, It would pass the test because it was supposed to have that chemical in the first place. Does nobody here have any reading comprehension?
I never said that chemtrails are real, I just explained how it can be done.
I will no longer reply to stupid theories that have no bearing on what I posted.
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Rudy2shoes
To prove to us that there is nothing added to the fuel that is harmful to humans, is show us pumping or fuel trucks that have no hazard warning decals on them.
Well let us go one step farther and ask how come cars don't have these decals as gasoline is also harmful and is much closer to the population compared to airplane jet exaust.
In fact how about you show us gasoline tankers without those same hazard warning decals?
Not one person has ever said that jet fuel is not hazardous, what has been said is that the chemicals chemtrail believers claim is in jet fuel is not, and has yet to be shown it is.
Originally posted by lonegurkha
reply to post by flyswatter
You are still not getting it. If it's supposed to be there, then nothing would be out of place. Man I wish you understood chemistry. Especially testing of chemicals. No more replys till you learn chemistry.
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Rudy2shoes
And 90 percent of those chemicals can be run through an engine without causing permanent damage to said such engines, as they are a part of maintaining engines.
So you have put these chemicals thru an engine and run it, because that is what your implying right?
And what are these chemicals you think you can run thru an engine that won't cause damage?
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Rudy2shoes
And 90 percent of those chemicals can be run through an engine without causing permanent damage to said such engines, as they are a part of maintaining engines.
So you have put these chemicals thru an engine and run it, because that is what your implying right?
And what are these chemicals you think you can run thru an engine that won't cause damage?