Originally posted by lifeform11
where have you been living all this time, yes people vote for who they think best reflects their interest, however once in office they backtrack, it
was all lies to get in, people then get angry and revolt, that is what you are seeing in london.
And if they backtrack, then it's their constituent's duty to correct them on this.
The government of any democratic country is entirely decided by the people; if the people fail to influence any subsequent policies, then they only
have themselves to blame.
Please stop with this '' people getting angry and revolt'' nonsense. Do you actually realise what an absolutely
tiny percentage of the
UK's voting population, these demonstrators, let alone rioters, represent ?
We're talking about struggling to make 0.1% of the population.
These fascists causing trouble in London
do not represent the feelings of the British voting public, which is why these arrogant clowns have
been sent packing, with their tails between firmly their legs, and the democratically approved Bill to raise tuition fees has been passed in
Parliament.
Originally posted by lifeform11
do people not have a right to fight for what they believe in and were promised?
Er... That's normally done at a General Election, which was held 6 months ago.
It's not the majority of voters' faults that there are some arrogant protesting twunts who want to force their
outre views on to the majority
of the population, who don't support their minority views.
Originally posted by lifeform11
by your logic, those who fought for womens rights were fascists, those who fought against poll tax were fascists, what you think is people should just
accept anything the politicians say because somebody voted for them.
Those who fought for women's rights were campaigning at a time when half the population were deemed ineligible to vote because of an accident of
birth. We have universal suffrage now, so your analogy is like apples and oranges. Not comparable.
Of course the poll tax demonstrators were fascists, and it was a shameful day in British society when a group of thugs was allowed to alter, or
influence, any policy that was democratically elected by the people.
Thankfully, they just reintroduced a similar tax in later years, under the more cosy title of ''community charge''.
Originally posted by lifeform11
they get in on 30% of the vote for a start most of the time, that means lots of people did not vote for them.
No they don't get in on ''30% of the vote''.
Of course lots of people don't vote for them - how exactly so you intend to please a constituency were people are voting for a dozen candidates ?
Originally posted by lifeform11
regardless if politicians said that they were going to start abolishing peoples rights at work, what you are saying is people should accept it because
that government was voted in, and anybody who is against it is a fascist.
As I've said countless times before ( or maybe it's just once or twice
):
At the General Election, you vote for the candidate who you think would best represent your views; if there's no candidate that represents your
views, then you can stand for election yourself ( I think it's a £500 deposit ).
The person who gains the most votes in your constituency gets elected as your representative in Parliament.
This is simple, and perfectly fair ( although, I'd prefer a different voting system than the 'first past the post' system that we currently have,
and I'll personally be voting for 'AV' in the referendum next year ).
Therefore, we can agree that the MPs in the Houses of Parliament are elected as the result of the people's vote.
Any Bills that an MP will subsequently vote on, should be voted upon with the consideration of the input that his constituents make surrounding the
particular issue or policy... If MPs hear little feedback from their constituents, then they are well within their rights to vote according to what
they think is best for their constituents
The majority of people in the UK don't even know who their MP is, let alone have they been down to the MP's surgery and discussed political or
social issues with them.
Any 'undesirable' state that a democratic country may find themselves in, is entirely down to the ineffectuality, inertia, and ineptitude of the
general populace.
Originally posted by lifeform11
sorry you have flawed logic. your logic is how facists get in, because nobody challenges them and let them do what they want.
No mate, there's no ''flawed logic'' in my arguments; in fact, my logic on this subject is demonstrably sound. If anyone can pick a hole in it,
then they're welcome to try.
The fascists are those that don't abide by the democratic process, and want to force their minority leftfield ideologies on to the majority of
citizens.
This fascist arrogance failed abysmally in London last week, and it will continue to fail in our great country; a country renowned for playing with a
straight bat.