white ufo filmed in HD

reply to post by Akezzon

Even if I wasn't, like the image perspective shows I'm somewhat in the same level, it wouldn't have matched.
See for your self:

i46.tinypic.com...

reply to post by Boston1023

It still doesn't match m8.
Look obove.

reply to post by Bluemcgee

I haven't resized my picture wrongly at all.
You might want me to have done that though, so you could reject it more easily. Big difference.
My screens are from original and in .png format - lossless.
Stop lying.

You really are a twit aren't you?

The shape is totally dependent on the angle...If you take any umbrella and give it the right angle you get the right shape.

You can't take images you find on the net.

You try so hard to see this in a professional way but you fail so hard on the most simple basics when it comes to imaging. Perspective....

You are so stuck at the thought of you found "a real ufo" that you simple won't let this go.

And judging from you way of reason with others...my best guess is that you are around 14- 17 years old. Probably a brat with too rich parents, you are used to have everyone around you agreeing with you and thus you get the illusion of you knows best and always have the right answers.

Through out this thread it has been like trying to discuss quantum mechanics with my 5 year old son...

This is not brain surgery...

Even my son understand it is an umbrella...

So, either swallow this and take it like a man. You precious ufo ARE debunked. End of story. Move on.

Go out and keep chasing.


[edit on 26-11-2009 by Akezzon]

Originally posted by maxxsee
You can be ignorant all you want, it doesn't change the fact the object is infront and that it doesn't look like an umbrella due to the inwards angles and no pole.

Please answer me this question:

How do you explain the fact that in some frames the object looks to be behind the flag pole?

I have a conspiracy theory.
Have you seen this thread?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Basically the owners of this website are worried that if this new bill is passed then they will have to ask your permission to put a cookie on your computer to display the third party ads.

I think the mods are leaving the ridiculous hoax threads like this one in the Aliens and UFOs forum, instead of moving it to the appropriate HOAX forum, because they get the most views and they're trying to milk as many ad views while they still can.

This thread has been proven many times over that the video is of a patio umbrella.
This thread has mods posting in it that know it's a hoax.
This thread has been reported to the mods and asked to be moved to the HOAX forum.

Why is it still here?

Why the hell is thread still going?

Why Is anybody still trying to convince this deluded individual that it's an Umbrella? We KNOW it is... all of us.

Why Has this thread not been moved to the hoax forum?

Originally posted by freelance_zenarchist

This thread has been reported to the mods and asked to be moved to the HOAX forum.

Why is it still here?

Exactly.... I've reported it twice and heard nothing back at all.

It's BS.

This is a joke and an embarrassment.

Originally posted by Akezzon

You can't take images you find on the net.

[edit on 26-11-2009 by Akezzon]

exactly what i was going to say.

You posted here and you found out the truth about you're ufo. Move along to your other vids and they'll analyze them. Save what face you have left head to the next topic.

[edit on 26-11-2009 by Boston1023]

reply to post by maxxsee


You are wrong.

Here I made a video that proves you wrong....

I made a 3D model of a 6 sided umbrella, and moved it around so that it matches.



The video is a video response to the original YouTube video by Maxxsee.



It's kind of fun feeding trolls poison.



[edit on 26-11-2009 by ALLis0NE]

Originally posted by ALLis0NE



[edit on 26-11-2009 by ALLis0NE]

that doesn't prove anything.... wait... oh it does prove it is an umbrella... who would have thought?

Originally posted by Akezzon
reply to post by draknoir2

 

Must be an alien behind that tree as well. You can the arm...it points towards the alien craft.

I totally missed that! Thanks... great find!

I think I've cracked it guys.

Maxsee is right.

I have a couple of stills of an alien hovering round, possibly descending.

Let me know what you think.




This one was snapped by a colleague in London.

Very similar craft and alien Being.






[edit on 26/11/09 by blupblup]

reply to post by ALLis0NE


Right on. That is one good looking Alien tie-fighter...
The shade of the umbrella has fallen....begun....the end of this thread has...

I was thinking of doin something like that...
But it is quite a while since I used Maya... besides I don't have it anylonger anyway so that doesn't help.

But awsome. Maybe NOW he might understand the angle issue...
And for some unknown reason...it looks pretty much like the outlined I made.
I must have been lucky...or?

[edit on 26-11-2009 by Akezzon]

Originally posted by maxxsee
I haven't resized my picture wrongly at all.

You can't lie to us Maxxsee. I am a professional graphic artist. I get paid to play with pixels. We can visually see that you are resizing your picture wrong. You have more pixels than your camera originally captured. We can see the supersampling in your image.

Only a noob would try to lie about something that we visually see with our eyes. It's like a kid saying he didn't eat the chocolate cake when he has chocolate all over his face.


Answer this: What resize algorithm are you using? Bilinear, Bicubic, Nearest Neighbor, lanczos, or Hqx?

Originally posted by maxxsee
You might want me to have done that though, so you could reject it more easily. Big difference.

We can visually see that you have resized your images wrong. You can't lie to us.

Originally posted by maxxsee
My screens are from original and in .png format - lossless.

You can save as .PNG all you want, it doesn't change the fact that you lost all the original data when you resized / enlarged the image.

Your resize method is lossy. When you saved as .PNG you just saved a lossy image in a lossless format. So you still have a lossy image..

Originally posted by maxxsee
Stop lying.

Only one lying is you.

I will prove you wrong for the rest of your life. I am not backing down.


[edit on 26-11-2009 by ALLis0NE]

reply to post by Akezzon


He can always say that the umbrella pole is visible, so it proves that he is right and it cannot be an umbrella.

reply to post by ArMaP


Yeah, I was kinda waiting for that comment to come from him.

Now you said it first. Maybe not as fun to take words from someones mouth.
Anyway. We have done all we can now, AllIsOne even made a clip of a 3D model to make him understand...

If he can't consider it to be an umbrella by now then I don't think he ever can.


[edit on 26-11-2009 by Akezzon]

OMG;
are you guys still talking about the umbrella?
I think everyone here knows its an umrella/gazebo;

and who cares what the OP wants to believe or lie about;
its like trying to argue with him about Christianity;

he is hopeless;
a billion people have told him the truth;
and if he doesnt want to listen then let him go his own way....
he will learn sooner or later (like when he wants to see a real ufo)

focus your energy and effort into something that advances humanity;
instead of this trash....



[edit on 26-11-2009 by DjSharperimage]

Utter garbage my friend...please don't take us for idiots...

What do you guys think, should we go for 100 pages??!!