It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sliadon
reply to post by Donnie Darko
I'm not sure intelligence is that genetic, I think it's more individualistic though genes of course have some bearing on the chance someone will be smart.
If my stance came across that way let me immediately apologize because that is not what I meant at all. In no way do I believe, nor suggest that intelligence is a genetic issue. What I meant was that people who happen to be uneducated tend to be more willing to follow leaders without question. There are numerous examples which contradict my statement in both the respect of highly educated who do the same as well as uneducated people that question TPTB and try to bring change. That being said, my concern was simply meant that it seems fishy to target the Educated class who already buys into the Green Revolution more.
Does that help? I hope I didn't miss your point get us both lost
-Sliadon
The researchers note that they are not advocating government controls or intervention on population issues, but say they simply want to make people aware of the environmental consequences of their reproductive choices.
The researchers note that they are not advocating government controls or intervention on population issues, but say they simply want to make people aware of the environmental consequences of their reproductive choices.
Originally posted by jkrog08
In my opinion that statement is a nothing more than the proper scientific and official way to clarify a statement. It is clarifying the statement that they made, making it known that they are only suggesting that we as individuals keep in mind the consequences of having many children. In my own personal opinion it is just saying we all should consider the larger issue here, not just our own personal desires (ie; to have a large family, or whatever other reasons people have many kids).
IT ALL boils down to people only needing 1-2 kids... a lot of people have 5 and a lot of them have psychological issues.
Originally posted by Sliadon
reply to post by Pauligirl
I'm really sorry that you feel that way.
However, if you recommend people on welfare (I.E. people who don't have money) to go on Birth Control, how do you expect them to pay for it? Your plan would raise your taxes in the process.
-Sliadon
Despite its discontinuation in the USA and the West, Norplant is still used in the developing world. According to one study 6.2 out of 100 rural women interviewed in one region in Bangladesh use the device, according to the United Nations Population Fund.[citation needed]
Norplant and other implantable contraceptives are especially effective in the developing world, as they do not require daily administration or access to a hospital to be effective. In addition, no continual contraceptive supplies (pills, condoms, etc.) are necessary, and it is a highly effective, low cost contraceptive over the long term.
I love people, and if a family can manage 3 kids or 4 kids im all for it, but When i see a person go to waste (the kid as a seed in a garden)... It really angers me.
Population in the world is currently growing at a rate of around 1.15 % per year. The average annual population change is currently estimated at over 77 million.
Annual growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at 2% and above. The rate of increase has therefore almost halved since its peak of 2.19 percent, which was reached in 1963, to the current 1.15%.
The annual growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue to decline in the coming years, but the pace of the future change is uncertain (1). Currently, it is estimated that it will become less than 1% by 2020 and less than 0.5% by 2050.
This means that world population will continue to grow into the 21st century, but at a slower rate compared to the recent past. World population has doubled (100% increase) in 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion). It is now estimated that it will take a further 42 years to increase by another 50%, to become 9 billion by 2042.
United Nations projections (Pdf document) indicate that world population will nearly stabilize at just above 10 billion persons after 2200.