HAARP Attacks Jupiter

a reply to: MykeNukem

Please show where I cited what you called MY source.

Here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I did not cite ADN, you did.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: butcherguy

The acronym means something different now?

Can you provide the new one?

The name wasn’t changed, although it was suggested that it be changed. The change suggested was to substitute ‘molecular’ for microwave.

But the name doesn’t mean that masers are limited to the microwave band of EM frequencies. It all depends what molecules are being stimulated as to what frequency is emitted.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MykeNukem

Please show where I cited what you called MY source.

Here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I did not cite ADN, you did.

I never said you cited ADN, I said your source did.

That's where the "tinfoil hatters" link is found, on your source, highlighted in a paragraph.

Clear?

a reply to: Phage

""Frequency" is not a noun."

I beg to differ.

www.merriam-webster.com...

a reply to: Phage

"Frequency" is not a noun. It is a description of something which repeats. A pogo stick has a frequency. A woman has a frequency.

whhhat?

from websters,

frequency noun fre·​quen·​cy ˈfrē-kwən(t)-sē plural frequencies

1 : the fact or condition of occurring frequently the frequency of automobile accidents

2 a : the number of times that a periodic function repeats the same sequence of values during a unit variation of the independent variable b : the number, proportion, or percentage of items in a particular category in a set of data

3 : the number of repetitions of a periodic process in a unit of time: such as a : the number of complete alternations (see alternation sense 1) per second of an alternating current b : the number of complete oscillations (see oscillation sense 3) per second of energy (such as sound or electromagnetic radiation) in the form of waves

perhaps a little school house rock will also help, pay special attention to anything you can show.



but frequency is absolutely a noun.

a reply to: butcherguy

The change suggested was to substitute ‘molecular’ for microwave.

So they are amplifying molecules now?

That makes about as much sense as the rest of your post.

So, through our ionosphere to theirs? And what are they going to learn?

a reply to: BernnieJGato

I'll stick with it being a description, an adjective, thank you. A radio transmission is "modified" by the frequency at which it is transmitted. Radio is the noun, frequency is the modifier.


But other than that, did I define it correctly? Can you fill a bucket with "frequencies?" A frequency is not a person, place, or thing.

H bond to HE

What other goal would you have ...

a reply to: Phage

I'll stick with it being a description, an adjective, thank you. A radio transmission is "modified" by the frequency at which it is transmitted. Radio is the noun, frequency is the modifier.

wrong again,

Adjectives for frequency include frequent, frequentaneous, frequentative, frequenter, frequentest, frequential, frequentistic, frequented and frequenting.

What is the adjective for frequency?

another school house rock,



now perhaps if you would have used signal like

the frequency of the signal returned every 2 micro seconds.

i could live with that, but then frequency would still be a noun.

Must be gonna bounce radio waves off of BlueWalker3 with it aimed at Jupiter. ? Maybe? before its being used for cell phone and microwave communications.
BlueWalker 3, pdf

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: butcherguy

The change suggested was to substitute ‘molecular’ for microwave.

So they are amplifying molecules now?

That makes about as much sense as the rest of your post.

Don’t get like that.
I never said that molecules are amplified.
One would think that you would know that the molecules are stimulated. The particular molecules that are stimulated are what determines the frequency of the emitted radiation.

Look up the man that invented the maser and the laser.
Charles Townes
Townes PDF

a reply to: Phage

HAARP also exists, the project's website notes, to learn more about shortwave radio communications and its application in global positioning systems, among other things. Maybe HAARP was used to search for Saddam's WMD.
www.adn.com...

Apparently it's also been used to swing elections and find made up thingys.

a reply to: butcherguy

I memorized the acronym LASER when I was ten. It was still a new thing back then.
Acronyms mean something. If you use them, mean them.

a reply to: Phage

Frequency certainly is a noun. Which is why when you write about it, you use the indefinite article "a," definite article "the," or add an s to the end to pluralize the noun.
We don't use articles with other parts of speech.
frequent would be the adjective form; frequently the adverb
Interesting topic in any case!

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: butcherguy

I memorized the acronym LASER when I was ten. It was still a new thing back then.
Acronyms mean something. If you use them, mean them.

You didn’t read anything that I linked you to, obviously.
It was the man that invented the maser that suggested the name be changed from microwave to molecular. But what would the inventor know about it, eh?

a reply to: zosimov

What is the frequency of the radio transmissions being used?

Radio transmission is a noun, in this case plural.

So frequency is a noun describing a noun?

i think the first volley missed and hit Mars instead. Tore a hole near the equator and exposed chunks of ice.

a reply to: Phage

Given the fact that branches of the United States government have openly discussed technologies used to interfere with the weather and cause Earth changes, it is difficult to dismiss critics so quickly. In 2005, the Air Force stated, “Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally… It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog, and storms on earth or to modify space weather…and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of technologies which can provide substantial increase in US, or degraded capability in an adversary, to achieve global awareness, reach, and power.”
GAIA

Not completely out of the range of possibility then?

Could they be so nefarious?

a reply to: butcherguy

So, is it microwaves (or light, or whatever) which is being amplified by stimulated emission of radiation?