Health Secretary Matt Hancock Resigns , Sajid Javid is his Replacement

a reply to: surfer_soul

Austerity was one of the biggest crimes ever committed on the British people.

It was sold as economic necessity but in reality the advancement of a political ideology that deliberately targeted and victimised the most needy and vulnerable in our society.
This coincided with further enrichment of the already obscenely wealthy elites as the gap between rich and poor increased at a never seen before rate.

I always knew there was a possibility that this pandemic would be manipulated to further another agenda.
I think they've played it masterfully so far.
It seems people have become so indoctrinated into believing everything the government machine preaches that they have become incapable of questioning anything and are increasingly subservient.

I'm no rabid anti-vaxxer or Covid denier, not by any stretch.
But enough is enough.

Is this all part of the same game plan?
Quite possibly.

a reply to: McGinty

As far as I know, nothing in the footage would give anything away about the type of device it was recorded on. Unless it was an Apple perhaps. The info should be in the meta data and usually it will have a time stamp and file type and that’s it.

As far as I know... the slight camera movement which you pointed out suggests a mobile recording or an r.c hidden camera. But the movement isn’t really necessary, also security cameras tend to have a more fish eye type lense or wide angle to capture more area.

For definite he was setup one way or another for this fall.

a reply to: Freeborn
Well said Freeborn.
You are damn right theres a plan being rolled out under the guise of covid.
Seems to me the plan is to institutionalize the entire population in our own homes-essentially pushing and pushing to see how much people will accept.
Turns out we accept quite a bit-which is not good news for us as the gov/borg will not stop methodically stripping away our liberty until we are under a system not dissimilar to China.

Agenda 21-which has too much conspiracy baggage had its name changed into our beloved great reset.

Both represent the same thing-the twilight of freedom and a technological authoritarian regime the likes of which Mao or Pol Pot would have given anything to acheive.

Its working like a charm-I know this because if I raise the issue with people,they look at me like I am mad.
Maybe I am mad-but I am not wrong on this point.

originally posted by: Doxanoxa
a reply to: gortex

Theres no "dodgy ****" going on it Westminster.

Whats dodgy is your thinking it would be anything else.

All rule makers are pimps and whores and usually both.

What interests me isn't where the photograph came from, but why it was released now.

What bigger story has been buried?

what was buried was Public Health Englands report.
In it it said that 62% of hospital deaths from Covid 19 had been vaccinated.

a reply to: McGinty

The footage is from a camera inside a smoke detector.
I think these are quite common now.After the Greenfell disaster all the smoke detectors in the lobbies of my flat where upgraded.A nice camera inside the new ones.
other flats in my city have also got these now so I presume the governments used it as another excuse to spy even more on the people.
Quite fitting that it caught one of their own.

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

I understood the reason for the first lockdown.
If anything the government were incompetent by not locking down earlier and harder.
That meant the lockdown went on far longer than necessary.

I get why they wanted us to wear masks in order to try to minimise the spread.

They repeated the mistakes of the first lockdown in November by not locking down hard enough and early enough.

They were far too late and soft in dealing with the Indian variant and allowed hundreds of infected people back into the country without adequate quarantine.

Its almost as if they actually want it to spread - I don't believe they do but there is a nagging doubt.

They've used the pandemic to brush up on their indoctrination techniques and turned us into a nation of paranoid automatons both unable and unwilling to question anything that comes from 'official sources'.

They've destroyed the hospitality industry, which is the primary place where we meet, socialise and amongst other things discuss how our government has been performing and their dodgy dealings.
Yes, we can still discuss things on relatively obscure sites on the internet....but for how long and if we are being honest just how effective is that?

They have seized the opportunity to further an agenda they have wanted to push for some time now.

Of course they don't want to 'kill us off' or destroy national and international trade.
There is no depopulation programme here.
But I get the impression they sure as hell want to make us more compliant and less questioning.

It seems as if Hancock was always at some point going to be offered up as some sort of sacrificial lamb.
It was just a question of how and when.

There'll be more to follow.

But nothing really will change, except the rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer.....and all with our feeble acquiescence and consent.

The march towards a Victorianesque society continues along with all the injustices and inequalities that went with it.

All a stretch?
Possibly....but I've come to think not.

a reply to: glen200376

No one in Westminster seemed to be aware that they were being filmed...

I could never understand why there was a camera in the secretary of state's office

If it's a genuine CCTV capture, then they'll be a scandal that minister have been filmed having what they thought were private conversations. Who's had access to this 'secret material'? How might it have been used to influence and coerce and for how long?

However, i'm far from convinced that it's indeed CCTV footage. Smoke detector camera's, or any other kind of automated or remote control camera doesn't move in that way. It's clearly and without any doubt whatsoever handheld. Question is, is that hand holding a phone filming a staged snog? Or is it holding a phone filming a screen playing the security feed of a non-staged snog?

As i said earlier, if its the latter then i'd expect to see at least a little reflection and possibly a screen edge come into shot with all the movement, but this doesn't happen. To me that suggests this is the actual footage, meaning the snog was staged, since the person filming wold've been stood on a chair directly behind the couple.

originally posted by: Freeborn
The whole system is corrupt to its very core.

I've repeatedly stated my belief that we need urgent and radical reform of our parliamentary and electoral processes and procedures.

Parliament also needs a thorough deep clean and rinsing out.

What we have at present is just a free for all for people connected to the old boy network.
They are blatantly milking this country for everything they can possibly get their hands on.

I'd personally bar anyone currently serving there, or who has in the last 30 or 40 years, from holding public office.
I'd include every single Civil Servant, secretary, private secretary, personal private secretary, chief of staff, office manager, aide, adviser, typist, arse wiper, policy consultant and any other person even remotely connected to and/or tainted with the set of nefarious, self-promoting, self-aggrandising, pompous, arrogant, smug bastards that infect the place at present.

Lobbyists need to be barred from anywhere near or connected to parliamentary business with open and transparent communication channels set up for anyone trying to influence policy.

Anyone with even the slightest connection to government business or policy should not be allowed to even tender for government related contracts.

A whole industry has grown up around advising government, politicians and the traditional political parties and this has to be quashed.
The people involved in this industry seem to be friends of friends, ex politicians and their advisers, wannabe politicians and their advisers, family of those connected to Westminster, school and student buddies of those in both Westminster and Whitehall.
It really is a merry-go-round with the same old people feeding their faces at the trough....all at our expense and beyond our control.

These people genuinely believe they are above the rules that govern the rest of us.
Their arrogance is unbounded.

The party political system is rancid and no longer fit-for-purpose.

The system that produces a non-stop stream of amoral, supercilious hypocrites, a hugely disproportionate number of whom seem to come from the same elitist background, needs smashing to bits.

A wise man used to tell me that there's nothing like a public hanging to focus attention.
Personally I'd suggest nothing like a few heads on spikes on Westminster Bridge to get the message across......

Hyperbole?
Possibly.
But that's the level of disgust I have for those who seek to govern me and the system that seeks to control me.

The other method is forget the rules for everyone.

As a society cease assisting any of the parliamentary pigs with anything, ever. No fuel, no services. No food. No medicine. Shun the lot of them and run them off into the wilderness.

Address issues as they occur. Bare minimum to run the very basics. Water, power, food.

You have commons. Use them. Grow communally, eat together.

originally posted by: Freeborn
The whole system is corrupt to its very core.

I've repeatedly stated my belief that we need urgent and radical reform of our parliamentary and electoral processes and procedures.

Parliament also needs a thorough deep clean and rinsing out.

What we have at present is just a free for all for people connected to the old boy network.
They are blatantly milking this country for everything they can possibly get their hands on.

I'd personally bar anyone currently serving there, or who has in the last 30 or 40 years, from holding public office.
I'd include every single Civil Servant, secretary, private secretary, personal private secretary, chief of staff, office manager, aide, adviser, typist, arse wiper, policy consultant and any other person even remotely connected to and/or tainted with the set of nefarious, self-promoting, self-aggrandising, pompous, arrogant, smug bastards that infect the place at present.

Lobbyists need to be barred from anywhere near or connected to parliamentary business with open and transparent communication channels set up for anyone trying to influence policy.

Anyone with even the slightest connection to government business or policy should not be allowed to even tender for government related contracts.

A whole industry has grown up around advising government, politicians and the traditional political parties and this has to be quashed.
The people involved in this industry seem to be friends of friends, ex politicians and their advisers, wannabe politicians and their advisers, family of those connected to Westminster, school and student buddies of those in both Westminster and Whitehall.
It really is a merry-go-round with the same old people feeding their faces at the trough....all at our expense and beyond our control.

These people genuinely believe they are above the rules that govern the rest of us.
Their arrogance is unbounded.

The party political system is rancid and no longer fit-for-purpose.

The system that produces a non-stop stream of amoral, supercilious hypocrites, a hugely disproportionate number of whom seem to come from the same elitist background, needs smashing to bits.

A wise man used to tell me that there's nothing like a public hanging to focus attention.
Personally I'd suggest nothing like a few heads on spikes on Westminster Bridge to get the message across......

Hyperbole?
Possibly.
But that's the level of disgust I have for those who seek to govern me and the system that seeks to control me.

The other method is forget the rules for everyone.

As a society cease assisting any of the parliamentary pigs with anything, ever. No fuel, no services. No food. No medicine. Shun the lot of them and run them off into the wilderness.

Address issues as they occur. Bare minimum to run the very basics. Water, power, food.

You have commons. Use them. Grow communally, eat together.

It goes from bad to worse for Matt Hancock as a Tory councillor in Matt Hancock's constituency has written a letter to the local Tory party asking that Hancock be deselected as MP if he doesn't resign his seat and stand down.

In his email to the chair of the West Suffolk Conservative Association, Mr Houlder said the controversy had shown Mr Hancock to be a "selfish, egotistical man".

"He has let every member of the public down, pontificating that they should all make huge sacrifices on the altar of the pandemic, whilst doing the complete opposite himself," Mr Houlder added.

He has also written directly to Mr Hancock, telling him: "If you have a shred of integrity or honour you would resign without delay.

"Do the residents of West Suffolk a favour and stand down."
news.sky.com...

a reply to: McGinty

The whole thing looks staged to me. Right at the start, it looks like Hancock is positioning himself right in front of the camera.

At first, I thought he was just blocking the door with his body, to ensure privacy, or at least to get enough warning before anyone saw them. But, after watching it repeatedly, I'm convinced that's not the case. It looks too awkward. The way he stands perfectly upright, pulling his feet together and then a pausing before she moves in to join him in shot. It's like he's posing for a photo (which I'm sure he's had plenty of practice at and is simply falling into practiced moves).

I could be wrong, but those few seconds seemed very suspicious to me. I also picked up on the camera movement, which I thought was strange.

a reply to: Freeborn

If you had the original video file, the information would probably be in the metadata of the file. You could probably also glean clues about the lens type and other hardware and software from the way the picture is encoded and any artefacts or anomalies in the footage, which might point to the type of device used and maybe even brand or model.

Anything that has been released to the public however, is most likely a copy of a copy of a copy, which would not contain the original metadata and would probably also have been converted into various other file types and compressed for sharing and posting to websites, thus changing the way the image is rendered and introducing artefacts that might not have been there originally.

In short, without the original file, there's no way to know.

a reply to: nik1halo

The camera movement simply is’t that of any cctv. It’s handheld, absolutely no question about it. But that alone doesn’t prove it’s staged - it could’ve been someone filming a screen showing the footage (but as I asked above, wouldn’t some level of reflection or glare would be likely in that scenario?).

Put that together with the convenient timing, the dodgy acting (although Hancock always looks a bit ‘schoolboy’ dodgy - like someone expecting to be caught) and that no one can conclusively explain how or why this was being filmed and the balance of probability falls quite heavily on this being staged.