It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: IAMTAT
Kerry's stepson was a partner with Hunter Biden and Whitey Bulger's nephew in the CHINA deal.
Ooh. stand corrected.
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Did you hear Rudy Guiliani this morning? He straight-up accused the Bidens of laundering money for the Ukrainians. $3 Million routed thru a few different shills (including Biden's son's company) to get the money into the United States without it being tied to Ukraine.
He also implied that Joe Biden was lying when he said he only mentioned the matter once, and that they can prove it.
Trump should dump Giuliani. Having a raving lunatic speak on his behalf does not help his cause.
originally posted by: thedigirati
can someone give me a link to the start of the impeachment hearings?
the person making that claim (Gorgonite) will suffice (but his last link was broken)
U.S. v. Nixon is also widely understood to mean that executive privilege cannot be used to cover up wrongdoing. That view was endorsed by current U.S. Attorney General William Barr during his Senate confirmation hearing.
One lesson of U.S. v. Nixon is that an executive privilege claim is particularly weak when Congress has invoked its power to remove a president from office through impeachment, said Frank Bowman, a law professor at the University of Missouri.
thanks in advance.
the other question I have is how does the whitehouse know of a whistleblower?
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Did you hear Rudy Guiliani this morning? He straight-up accused the Bidens of laundering money for the Ukrainians. $3 Million routed thru a few different shills (including Biden's son's company) to get the money into the United States without it being tied to Ukraine.
He also implied that Joe Biden was lying when he said he only mentioned the matter once, and that they can prove it.
Trump should dump Giuliani. Having a raving lunatic speak on his behalf does not help his cause.
LOL. This isn't even the first time the Bidens have done this. Joe himself received a nice bundle of money from the Chinese.
Maybe that's why Obama didn't want Biden to run for president.
originally posted by: Gorgonite
a reply to: thedigirati
www.aljazeera.com...
The first impeachment hearing was the one featuring Corey Lewandowski
www.apnews.com...
Specifically the material must contain Diplomatic or Military secrets according to SCOTUS
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Did you hear Rudy Guiliani this morning? He straight-up accused the Bidens of laundering money for the Ukrainians. $3 Million routed thru a few different shills (including Biden's son's company) to get the money into the United States without it being tied to Ukraine.
He also implied that Joe Biden was lying when he said he only mentioned the matter once, and that they can prove it.
Trump should dump Giuliani. Having a raving lunatic speak on his behalf does not help his cause.
LOL. This isn't even the first time the Bidens have done this. Joe himself received a nice bundle of money from the Chinese.
Maybe that's why Obama didn't want Biden to run for president.
...like his bragging at the CFR meeting about getting the Ukrainian prosecutor, investigating his son for corruption, fired by witholding billions of US taxpayer money to Ukraine.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Extorris
Specifically the material must contain Diplomatic or Military secrets according to SCOTUS
and what else would the conversation between trump and the head of state be?
thanks for admitting that
you still have yet to address the official statement from the Ukrainians, wonder why that is?
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Extorris
Specifically the material must contain Diplomatic or Military secrets according to SCOTUS
and what else would the conversation between trump and the head of state be?
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gorgonite
The contents of a potus's conversation with another head of state are privileged, imo.
He could have been talking about robbing a bank and imo there is nothing congess can do about it.
It is a constitutional power.
What do you make of the official statement from the Ukrainians?
originally posted by: Gorgonite
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gorgonite
The contents of a potus's conversation with another head of state are privileged, imo.
He could have been talking about robbing a bank and imo there is nothing congess can do about it.
It is a constitutional power.
What do you make of the official statement from the Ukrainians?
If the accusations are true, then the president acted in a criminal manner. At this point, the president has all but confirmed that he did indeed ask about investigating Biden. The only question now is what form did that request come in?
Supreme Court ruled that executive privilege DOES NOT cover evidence requested in an impeachment hearing or criminal behavior.
Hunter Biden’s BHR [Bohai Harvest] also invests in China General Nuclear Power Group (CGN).
In Nov 2015, CGN acquired Malaysia’s 1MBD energy assets.
In 2016, DOJ charged CGN with stealing nuclear secrets from the US stretching back almost 2 decades.
In Aug 2019, the US @CommerceGov added CGN (Hunter Biden’s Investment) To it’s “entity list”, barring US companies from selling products to CGN.
How do you think that will work out?