It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The United Nations heavily criticized the Vatican on Wednesday for what it said was a systematic adoption of policies allowing priests to rape and sexually abuse tens of thousands of children.
The devastating report published by the U.N. Committee on the Rights of a Child said the Vatican must "immediately remove" all known or suspected child abusers within the clergy.
In response, the Vatican said in a statement published on its website that some points made in the report were an "attempt to interfere with Catholic Church teaching."
The Vatican said it would examine the report thoroughly and reiterated its commitment to defending and protecting child rights in accordance with the U.N. guidelines and "the moral and religious values offered by Catholic doctrine."
"Well-known child sexual abusers have been transferred from parish to parish or to other countries in an attempt to cover-up such crimes," the report said.
It later added: "Due to a code of silence imposed on all members of the clergy under penalty of excommunication, cases of child sexual abuse have hardly ever been reported to the law enforcement authorities in the countries where such crimes occurred."
Krazysh0t
reply to post by Chrisfishenstein
So annoying... I did a search for "vatican" in the ATS search and that thread didn't pop up...
Krazysh0t
Ok so I did a search and didn't see this posted. If it was, go ahead and delete.
Well it looks like the RCC is finally being called out on their shady practices of shuffling pedo-priests around. It looks like the UN is calling out the RCC for creating an atmosphere so that pedophile priests can be secure and keep on doing their evil.
U.N. Report: Vatican Policies Allowed Priests To Rape Children
The United Nations heavily criticized the Vatican on Wednesday for what it said was a systematic adoption of policies allowing priests to rape and sexually abuse tens of thousands of children.
The devastating report published by the U.N. Committee on the Rights of a Child said the Vatican must "immediately remove" all known or suspected child abusers within the clergy.
Of course, the RCC pushed back.
In response, the Vatican said in a statement published on its website that some points made in the report were an "attempt to interfere with Catholic Church teaching."
Wait. What? Attempt to interfere with Catholic Church teaching? Letting priests molest children is church teaching? I'm really not sure what the RCC means with this statement (and the MSN article doesn't elaborate), but any response to the UN's criticisms besides, "You are right, we are sorry and will work immediately to fix this," is the wrong answer. Instead we get this statement which looks like they are saying, "Stay out of our business! If we went to molest children that is what we will do!"
The Vatican said it would examine the report thoroughly and reiterated its commitment to defending and protecting child rights in accordance with the U.N. guidelines and "the moral and religious values offered by Catholic doctrine."
Anyone else get the idea that this is lip service? I find it hard to believe that the RCC will change their ways because of the UN report as well as due to the previous statement.
"Well-known child sexual abusers have been transferred from parish to parish or to other countries in an attempt to cover-up such crimes," the report said.
It later added: "Due to a code of silence imposed on all members of the clergy under penalty of excommunication, cases of child sexual abuse have hardly ever been reported to the law enforcement authorities in the countries where such crimes occurred."
Already knew this, but it's nice that the UN is reiterating this.
Time and again, I read about Christians saying that there is an attack against Christianity. Well with practices like those outlined in the OP, is it any surprise? I was raised RCC and it was because of the actions mentioned above that I left the church. Thank uh... God(?) that none of that happened to me. Though I didn't want to hang around any longer in case it did.
Specimen
If I ever had a priest touch my kid(which I don't have), I would gut like them a fish due to immense blood lust an rage.
I wouldn't care bout going to jail, cause I solved a problem.
Although violence is beneath me, I hope the church goes broke.
But seriously, I"D SNAP.
Specimen
reply to post by Aleister
No one teaches their kids stranger danger anymore.
Krazysh0t
Wait. What? Attempt to interfere with Catholic Church teaching? Letting priests molest children is church teaching?
rupertg
The age of consent in the vatican is 12 years old.
No prizes for guessing who proposed that...
NuclearPaul
rupertg
The age of consent in the vatican is 12 years old.
No prizes for guessing who proposed that...
Exactly.
You don't have to be Einstein to work out why they did that, do you?
While the Vatican State has not made its own complete separate criminal code, and generally uses the Italian criminal code that was in effect at the time of the Lateran Treaty, there are exceptions to this rule. The "Law of the Source of Law" of the Vatican State requires that any Italian laws must first defer to divine law, to Papal decrees, and to canon law. As the Vatican understands divine law, all sex outside of marriage is illicit, and therefore the only lawful consent that may be made for sexual relations is the consent between a husband and a wife. Canon 1083 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law states that "A man before he has completed his sixteenth year of age and a woman before she has completed her fourteenth year of age cannot enter into a valid marriage."