It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: punkinworks10
a reply to: Wolfenz
Why would the Vinca Script call into question the history of writing?, it just adds to the history of writing.
And if one really looks into the history of writing as we know it today, with Sumerian Cuneiforn being the next oldest after Vinca, it makes perfect sense that Vinca is a precurser to Cuneiform. Metallurgy was brought to Mesopotamia from the very region that Vinca originates in.
And what that has to do with book burnings i cant possibly imagine, as those early writing systems were usually on a druable media such as pottery, or in the case of the mentioned item wood, which if fell into the hands of a competing socio-political group, would not have been understood anyway.
originally posted by: punkinworks10
a reply to: Wolfenz
Why would the Vinca Script call into question the history of writing?, it just adds to the history of writing.
And if one really looks into the history of writing as we know it today, with Sumerian Cuneiforn being the next oldest after Vinca, it makes perfect sense that Vinca is a precurser to Cuneiform. Metallurgy was brought to Mesopotamia from the very region that Vinca originates in.
And what that has to do with book burnings i cant possibly imagine, as those early writing systems were usually on a druable media such as pottery, or in the case of the mentioned item wood, which if fell into the hands of a competing socio-political group, would not have been understood anyway.
originally posted by: username74
woo meets science
some will love this, some not so much
www.youtube.com...
originally posted by: username74
a reply to: Harte
why doesnt someone qualified like medical personel check these things out?
originally posted by: username74
a reply to: Harte
cause forester seems to be , shall we say, pragmatic, thats why, anyway its taken 5 years so farand i havent found anything on the relevant heads,not that i hablo espangol or know much of biology of divers head deformation.
surely it would cut the snake oil out
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: username74
a reply to: Harte
cause forester seems to be , shall we say, pragmatic, thats why, anyway its taken 5 years so farand i havent found anything on the relevant heads,not that i hablo espangol or know much of biology of divers head deformation.
surely it would cut the snake oil out
His descriptions of the heads are lies (larger volume of brain than human, lack of sagittal sutures, tiny holes in the back never seen on humans, etc.)
Also, ever wonder why he doesn't ever show the skeletons?
It's because they are obviously human.
Foerster runs a touring agency in Peru - tours of "mysterious places."
It simply wouldn't do if more people knew those places were somewhat less mysterious than he categorizes them.
In addition, he tries to write fringe books, but it seems all he can do is get himself listed as a co-author.
Also, he makes money from appearing at conferences and conventions of the poor, unfortunate (and blithering) idiots that are willing to pay to hear him, Klaus Dona, Hancock and others discuss their utterly unsupported ideas in a safe, fact-free space.
Harte
Also, ever wonder why he doesn't ever show the skeletons? It's because they are obviously human.
Atavisms seem to violate one of the central evolutionary principles, known as Dollo's law, that "an organism is unable to return, even partially, to a previous stage already realized in the ranks of its ancestors." Although it is still not clear what triggers and controls the reactivation of dormant traits, atavisms are a challenge to evolutionary biologists and geneticists.
The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of the city. When he saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground. 2 “My lords,” he said, “please turn aside to your servant’s house. You can wash your feet and spend the night and then go on your way early in the morning.” “No,” they answered, “we will spend the night in the square.”
3 But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. 4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house. 5 They called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them.”
6 Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him 7 and said, “No, my friends. Don’t do this wicked thing. 8 Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don’t do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.”
9 “Get out of our way,” they replied. “This fellow came here as a foreigner, and now he wants to play the judge! We’ll treat you worse than them.” They kept bringing pressure on Lot and moved forward to break down the door.
10 But the men inside reached out and pulled Lot back into the house and shut the door. 11 Then they struck the men who were at the door of the house, young and old, with blindness so that they could not find the door.
12 The two men said to Lot, “Do you have anyone else here—sons-in-law, sons or daughters, or anyone else in the city who belongs to you? Get them out of here, 13 because we are going to destroy this place. The outcry to the Lord against its people is so great that he has sent us to destroy it.
”23 By the time Lot reached Zoar, the sun had risen over the land. 24 Then the Lord rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah—from the Lord out of the heavens. 25 Thus he overthrew those cities and the entire plain, destroying all those living in the cities—and also the vegetation in the land. 26 But Lot’s wife looked back, and she became a pillar of salt.
originally posted by: fotsyfots
" conferences and conventions of the poor, unfortunate (and blithering) idiots that are willing to pay to hear him, Klaus Dona, Hancock and others discuss their utterly unsupported ideas in a safe, fact-free space. "
Harte
Dude, as everytime your elitist type poo-pooing of other "theories" makes me throw up in my throat a little .
originally posted by: username74
a reply to: Wolfenz
well not to get involved in your discussion over the integrity of this chap, i would point out that you must consider the possibilty that it could also be an as yet unclassified ailment or deformity. the heuristic of occam should point you here first.
originally posted by: Wolfenz
The Dispilio Tablet
its one of the Oldest form of actual Writing .. little over 7 thousand years old..
and predates a lot of other claimed 1st written recorded history..
It Calls into Question because, it predate's what scholars to science Archaeologist ETC: once thought
when Written Language came to be and this is ((( 2,000 ))) years older the the oldest Sumerian Text..
ok ... Who Knows what type of Clay to Stone Cuneiform Tablets
that were Out there and what they contained for Knowledge
in those Ancient Middle eastern Libraries that were Destroyed and Burned!!
through the Centuries and Millenniums... from Religion Fundels , and Conquering Raids
Durible media ?? not when they are Smashed to bits! or Parchments Scrolls Books that were
intentionally Burned
yet we have been on this Planet ( Modern Man ) for 250,000 + years or 400,000 years
Depending what Scientist your Asking .. LOL
if you want to talk about a Big Brain Fart of Amnesia
check or see the Sites of Puma Punku of Lost Ancient Advanced Technology ( 1,000 to 2,000 years + )
that Modern Technology would have a hard time duplicating ..
and still have difficulty trying to explain how they were built from a so called Primitive People INCAS
The One of Most Controversial Site on the Planet.. ..