It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MysterX
reply to post by Gemwolf
Your final conclusion may well be correct, but let's remember, assuming this is actually true (i know...) there will most certainly be many vairiables we are certainly not being made aware of, not least of which is the purpose of these craft.
Many military, LEO's and 'agency people' will immediately recognise and appreciate the merit in slowly and carefully approaching a potentially unstable person in a non-threatening manner...to an unstable person, the sudden appearence of authorities can be rather unsettling to say the least can't it.. so appreciating that, slow and steady is going to be preferable to fast and alarming..you'd agree yes?
Again, for the sake of argument and discussion, and still assuming these craft are actually in our vacinity, it may be taken that those who operate them, may not wish to unduly alarm nor appear threatening to us which would indeed be more the case if the craft arrived with fast and alarming speed and movements.
Not that i'm saying ANY of this report about enormous craft is either accurate or indeed otherwise, because i'm not...i AM saying if i were at the helm of enormous space craft, arriving into a system that was home to a technological and intelligent but altogether skittish, paranoid and by my standards as a controller of a couple of enormous interstellar craft, fairly backwards looking species...i'd approach slowly and in a non-threatening manner too...if my intentions were honourable of course.
If i were in this system to do ill on the other hand...i'd have come in hell for leather, obscured my craft behind a handy planet or moon and unleashed all manner of hell on the inhabited world or worlds from far away...wouldn't you?
Slow is good when sighting enormous space craft entering our little system would be my thinking.
reply to post by dragonridr
Or you do like they did in world war 2 bring a huge battleship close to shore and pummel them into submission. Theres only two reason to bring a ship the size of a city. Either your populating a new system or you armed to the teeth like an aircraft carrier. Either way not good for us. So if two of them had actually shown up and not a made up story id say panic and be prepared.
MysterX
reply to post by dragonridr
Or you do like they did in world war 2 bring a huge battleship close to shore and pummel them into submission. Theres only two reason to bring a ship the size of a city. Either your populating a new system or you armed to the teeth like an aircraft carrier. Either way not good for us. So if two of them had actually shown up and not a made up story id say panic and be prepared.
The WW2 analogy you make is exactly what i said would be expected by our planners if our assumed enormous craft were actually here for nefarious purposes...we're still here, and no pummelling has happened, yet (assuming these craft are actually here of course).
There are many more than two reasons to arrive in two enormous space craft, just about anyone could think of at least a dozen valid reasons, especially considering how well we know ourselves, and how well they really ought to know us if they have indeed entered our system.
I'll leave it up to you and others to realise what they would be.
Suffice to say, the slow speed issue now has a very plausible and logical explanation, albeit based upon our own limited experience of one another here on Earth, and admittedly not based upon a 'cosmopolitan cognitive experience' of non-terrestrial species.
'Armed to the teeth' craft, in the current context, is pure, paranoid speculation...i touched on that paranoia with the speed of arrival question i believe...again, such an enormous craft, by virtue of it's obvious technicality and sophistication would have little to fear from our offerrings in retaliation.. or do you think our best space agency, in our hypothetical scenario under discussion, would seriously imagine a few Terrier-Orion class rockets, carrying nuclear payloads of any size so far manufactured used in defense, would pose any significant danger to such craft?
I do not.
So i would say, in such a scenario... if the intention was to settle or take control of ourselves and our planet, it's laughable to assume it would not be accomplished easily, very swiftly and from a VERY remote position, edge of system remote would be my assumption.
This isn't WW2 anymore, and if it were actually happening...it wouldn't be orchestrated by Human thinking or our historical parallels of warfare.
IMO.edit on 21-1-2014 by MysterX because: typo
Welcome to the Turner Radio Network. As of December, 10, 2010, this web site is under new ownership. The former owner, radio host Hal Turner, was Ordered by United States District Court Judge Donald Walter, to divest himself of control or ownership of all websites after his conviction at a THIRD federal trial of "Threatening" federal officials. He is not allowed to own, control or contribute content to web sites until the end of his probation in October, 2015. Hal Turner no longer has any connection whatsoever to this web site and does not contribute to its content.
3u40r15m
"Visually Confirmed" By who exactly? Not NASA!
Leonidas
What a mess. This is not worthy of ATS.
Words in titles of threads lately that serve as a warning that what follows is complete B.S.:
"Proof", "Confirmed", "Fact"