It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
schuyler
First off I'm amazed at some of the ignorant answers given here, including those that have been removed. For a site that purports to deny ignorance and foster serious debate, well, it isn't happening and I'm ashamed of these people. You came here for an explanation and explained the circumstances. You deserve that rather than ridicule or just an argument.
Secondly, I'm going with the premis that you did NOT really see the real Jesus primarily because it is highly unlikely he ever existed. Not that there was not a human being back there 2,000 years ago that engendered some of the stories we have today, but he couldn't possibly have looked like the art that depicts him today, most of which is from the Middle Ages. In other words, "Jesus" wasn't tall, wasn't Caucasian, did not have long-flowing brown hair nor wear heavenly robes. And he wasn't good-looking guy, but more a salt-of-the-earth kind of guy, which even the Bible states is true. If he existed at all, he was probably short and brown-skinned.
So THAT means what you saw was your own idea of what Jesus looked like based on your current perceptions. And at five years old you had them. Your mother was devout and you had been exposed to Christianity all your life--a mere five years, but still--that was enough. Five years old is not a baby. You knew most of your native language by then. You walked and talked and interacted with your family. You were compelled to participate and pray when told. You had seen "pictures of Jesus" and you knew about being "bad or good," the difference between them, and I'll just bet your mother had told you that Jesus likes good kids and doesn't like bad ones, one way or another.
So you were being a five-year old jerk, as we all likely were at one time or another, and you knew it, so you had a vision. It was solely YOUR vision because your Mother did not see it and asked you what you were talking about. Where did it come from? Probably your sub-conscious. You were, in effect, disciplining yourself. No doubt it was COMPLETELY REAL to you and the message was delivered. Bear in mind that at five years old you had not been completely subjugated by our idea of what is or is not real. You did not know such an event was "impossible," so you had it.
So was this vision real to you? Of course it was. No one can take that away from you, including people here who think they know better. But what was it really? I suppose we can go off on a tangent and suggest it was some OTHER entity masquerading from the Other Side and providing a service to your family, but we have no real evidence of this and it goes beyond the facts that you presented.
So the bottom line is to accept it as "real" within your own experience, but "not real" in terms of an objective presence and just move on. I remember some "weird" things that happened to me at five years old, too, but they don't run my life and I'm not obsessed with thinking about them. I would submit that this approach is reasonable under the circumstances.
schuyler
Well, I'll tell ya, buddy. I have been about as kind and thoughtful as anyone could be about your experience. If you reject what I have to say, then I doubt you will find ANY comfort on these forums as most people think you are simply delusional. In any case, you had the experience. No one else did, not even your mother who was right there with you. There's not really anywhere you can go with this in terms of someone else giving you an explanation that fits all your needs.
GeminiSky
This was real, the entity appeared to be physically in the room, and like I said there was definite time dilation occurring...
GeminiSky
schuyler Secondly, I'm going with the premis that you did NOT really see the real Jesus primarily because it is highly unlikely he ever existed. Not that there was not a human being back there 2,000 years ago that engendered some of the stories we have today, but he couldn't possibly have looked like the art that depicts him today, most of which is from the Middle Ages. In other words, "Jesus" wasn't tall, wasn't Caucasian, did not have long-flowing brown hair nor wear heavenly robes. And he wasn't good-looking guy, but more a salt-of-the-earth kind of guy, which even the Bible states is true. If he existed at all, he was probably short and brown-skinned.
MERCURIOUS55
schuyler Secondly, I'm going with the premis that you did NOT really see the real Jesus primarily because it is highly unlikely he ever existed. Not that there was not a human being back there 2,000 years ago that engendered some of the stories we have today, but he couldn't possibly have looked like the art that depicts him today, most of which is from the Middle Ages. In other words, "Jesus" wasn't tall, wasn't Caucasian, did not have long-flowing brown hair nor wear heavenly robes. And he wasn't good-looking guy, but more a salt-of-the-earth kind of guy, which even the Bible states is true. If he existed at all, he was probably short and brown-skinned.
www.mariavaltortawebring.com...
According to the historical record i.e. (Pontius Pilate's letter to Tiberius Caesar etc.) Jesus was tall, had long hair that was golden brown in color, blue eyed, somewhat stoop shouldered and serene in countenance.
Search, and search hard and the answers can be had.edit on 21-2-2014 by MERCURIOUS55 because: (no reason given)
AfterInfinity
MERCURIOUS55
schuyler Secondly, I'm going with the premis that you did NOT really see the real Jesus primarily because it is highly unlikely he ever existed. Not that there was not a human being back there 2,000 years ago that engendered some of the stories we have today, but he couldn't possibly have looked like the art that depicts him today, most of which is from the Middle Ages. In other words, "Jesus" wasn't tall, wasn't Caucasian, did not have long-flowing brown hair nor wear heavenly robes. And he wasn't good-looking guy, but more a salt-of-the-earth kind of guy, which even the Bible states is true. If he existed at all, he was probably short and brown-skinned.
www.mariavaltortawebring.com...
According to the historical record i.e. (Pontius Pilate's letter to Tiberius Caesar etc.) Jesus was tall, had long hair that was golden brown in color, blue eyed, somewhat stoop shouldered and serene in countenance.
Search, and search hard and the answers can be had.edit on 21-2-2014 by MERCURIOUS55 because: (no reason given)
Would that not have subjected him to ridicule and distrust among the Jews of his time?
GeminiSky
If you read carefully you would understand that at the time of the experience I had NEVER seen any pictures, depictions, or sculptures of jesus, whatsoever...my baptism consisted of a priest rubbing some oil on me and putting on a gold cross. Other than that there was no religious exposure.
We never went to church, never prayed, never went anywhere that had religious altars or paintings. So I had NO conception of what jesus was or looked liked, so clearly this was not something out of my subconscious. I really wish people would understand that I only knew this was a being that looked like jesus, ONLY years later when I saw a painting.